These 4 Measures Indicate That Interactive Digital Technologies (GTSM:6486) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Interactive Digital Technologies Inc. (GTSM:6486) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

Advertisement

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

View our latest analysis for Interactive Digital Technologies

What Is Interactive Digital Technologies's Net Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2020 Interactive Digital Technologies had NT$578.4m of debt, an increase on none, over one year. But on the other hand it also has NT$1.18b in cash, leading to a NT$597.1m net cash position.

debt-equity-history-analysis
GTSM:6486 Debt to Equity History February 3rd 2021

How Healthy Is Interactive Digital Technologies' Balance Sheet?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Interactive Digital Technologies had liabilities of NT$1.21b due within 12 months and liabilities of NT$617.6m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of NT$1.18b and NT$439.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling NT$210.4m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

Given Interactive Digital Technologies has a market capitalization of NT$2.89b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time. While it does have liabilities worth noting, Interactive Digital Technologies also has more cash than debt, so we're pretty confident it can manage its debt safely.

The modesty of its debt load may become crucial for Interactive Digital Technologies if management cannot prevent a repeat of the 40% cut to EBIT over the last year. When it comes to paying off debt, falling earnings are no more useful than sugary sodas are for your health. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is Interactive Digital Technologies's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. Interactive Digital Technologies may have net cash on the balance sheet, but it is still interesting to look at how well the business converts its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, because that will influence both its need for, and its capacity to manage debt. Over the most recent three years, Interactive Digital Technologies recorded free cash flow worth 73% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

Summing up

While it is always sensible to look at a company's total liabilities, it is very reassuring that Interactive Digital Technologies has NT$597.1m in net cash. The cherry on top was that in converted 73% of that EBIT to free cash flow, bringing in NT$68m. So we are not troubled with Interactive Digital Technologies's debt use. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 2 warning signs with Interactive Digital Technologies (at least 1 which can't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

If you decide to trade Interactive Digital Technologies, use the lowest-cost* platform that is rated #1 Overall by Barron’s, Interactive Brokers. Trade stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds on 135 markets, all from a single integrated account. Promoted


New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
*Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020


Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

About TPEX:6486

Interactive Digital Technologies

Provides telecom, media, information technology (IT) and cloud, and geographical information system related professional consulting and implementation services in Taiwan.

Flawless balance sheet second-rate dividend payer.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

JO
Jolt_Communications
MYSE logo
Jolt_Communications on Myseum ·

The Future of Social Sharing Is Private and People Are Ready

Fair Value:US$7.9577.4% undervalued
35 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
TO
Tokyo
ASML logo
Tokyo on ASML Holding ·

EU#3 - From Philips Management Buyout to Europe’s Biggest Company

Fair Value:€1.31k9.0% undervalued
30 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative
YI
BKNG logo
yiannisz on Booking Holdings ·

Booking Holdings: Why Ground-Level Travel Trends Still Favor the Platform Giants

Fair Value:US$5.47k6.3% undervalued
7 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
CO
composite32
SHEL logo
composite32 on Shell ·

A fully integrated LNG business seems to be ignored by the market.

Fair Value:UK£36.122.7% undervalued
38 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

CO
composite32
SGRO logo
composite32 on SEGRO ·

SEGRO's Revenue to Rise 14.7% Amidst Optimistic Growth Plans

Fair Value:UK£9.3918.8% undervalued
6 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AL
alex30free
BEIJ B logo
alex30free on Beijer Ref ·

The Green Consolidator

Fair Value:SEK 128.821.0% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
BE
EDP logo
BenjaminMartins on EDP ·

EDP as a safe capital allocation with a potential upside of 28% with steady dividends

Fair Value:€513.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

WE
WealthAP
PYPL logo
WealthAP on PayPal Holdings ·

The "Sleeping Giant" Stumbles, Then Wakes Up

Fair Value:US$8236.2% undervalued
85 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
35 users have liked this narrative
OO
NEO logo
OOO97 on Neo Performance Materials ·

Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth

Fair Value:CA$25.3324.6% undervalued
75 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$253.0226.6% undervalued
1049 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
31 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

HE
Hemingway
AEVA logo
Hemingway on Aeva Technologies ·

NVDA+AEVA Agreement is a game changer for the AEVA stock even though it is just a partnership and does not have a roll out until 2028 (which means receivables as early as 2027, I would imagine) This agreement effectively moves the goal posts of profitability for AEVA much closer since this is in addition to the recent Forterra agreement, as well as the (previously announced) European carmaker agreement (which is believed to be Mercedes-Benz and estimated to be worth at least 1 billion in sales alone) Underneath all of this, AEVA has a pre-existing agreement with Daimler Truck. So business seems to be booming, especially with really big name brands…which tends to bring in even more brand names (and thus more agreements/contracts/announcements, etc). This dynamic often creates more coverage from analysts (often with upside stock initial coverage) that I believe will be occurring over the next 3 to 6 months (as professional traders/analysts often research for 2 to 3 months before initiating coverage of a new issue). I also feel that the above momentum increases the likelihood that companies that do not currently utilize 4G LIDAR technology might consider buying AEVA outright. Realistically, even with a substantial premium to the current stock price, the cost of AEVA would be a rounding error for the likes of a company such as Tesla, and certainly would allow them to maintain their technological edge as the competition for self-driving vehicles continues to heat up. However, I think it is equally possible for NVidea to decide to lock-in the AEVA technology for their upcoming autonomous hardware/software package by buying them outright. Obviously, the above factors and recent activity in the AEVA stock are cause for optimism. Of course, this all just one opinion , so please do your own due diligence. Disclaimer: I/We DO trade in this stock from time to time and I/we may (or may not have) a position currently, so again, please do your own due diligence.

0
|
0
US
AVGO logo
User on Broadcom ·

Net here,remains to be seen!

0
|
0
Advertisement