A Close Look At Boustead Singapore Limited’s (SGX:F9D) 8.7% ROCE

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!

Today we’ll evaluate Boustead Singapore Limited (SGX:F9D) to determine whether it could have potential as an investment idea. Specifically, we’ll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), since that will give us an insight into how efficiently the business can generate profits from the capital it requires.

First up, we’ll look at what ROCE is and how we calculate it. Next, we’ll compare it to others in its industry. Last but not least, we’ll look at what impact its current liabilities have on its ROCE.

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. In general, businesses with a higher ROCE are usually better quality. In brief, it is a useful tool, but it is not without drawbacks. Renowned investment researcher Michael Mauboussin has suggested that a high ROCE can indicate that ‘one dollar invested in the company generates value of more than one dollar’.

So, How Do We Calculate ROCE?

Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

Or for Boustead Singapore:

0.087 = S$50m ÷ (S$891m – S$314m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2019.)

So, Boustead Singapore has an ROCE of 8.7%.

View our latest analysis for Boustead Singapore

Does Boustead Singapore Have A Good ROCE?

ROCE can be useful when making comparisons, such as between similar companies. Using our data, we find that Boustead Singapore’s ROCE is meaningfully better than the 4.3% average in the Construction industry. I think that’s good to see, since it implies the company is better than other companies at making the most of its capital. Separate from how Boustead Singapore stacks up against its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms is mediocre; relative to the returns on government bonds. It is possible that there are more rewarding investments out there.

SGX:F9D Past Revenue and Net Income, July 10th 2019
SGX:F9D Past Revenue and Net Income, July 10th 2019

It is important to remember that ROCE shows past performance, and is not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be deceptive for cyclical businesses, as returns can look incredible in boom times, and terribly low in downturns. ROCE is only a point-in-time measure. You can check if Boustead Singapore has cyclical profits by looking at this free graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

Boustead Singapore’s Current Liabilities And Their Impact On Its ROCE

Current liabilities are short term bills and invoices that need to be paid in 12 months or less. Due to the way the ROCE equation works, having large bills due in the near term can make it look as though a company has less capital employed, and thus a higher ROCE than usual. To check the impact of this, we calculate if a company has high current liabilities relative to its total assets.

Boustead Singapore has total assets of S$891m and current liabilities of S$314m. Therefore its current liabilities are equivalent to approximately 35% of its total assets. Boustead Singapore’s middling level of current liabilities have the effect of boosting its ROCE a bit.

What We Can Learn From Boustead Singapore’s ROCE

With this level of liabilities and a mediocre ROCE, there are potentially better investments out there. Of course, you might also be able to find a better stock than Boustead Singapore. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have grown earnings strongly.

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: insiders have been buying them).

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.