Vista Alegre Atlantis SGPS Valuation
Is VAF undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?
Valuation Score 2/6
Price-To-Earnings vs Peers
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio
Below Fair Value
Significantly Below Fair Value
Key Valuation Metric
Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for VAF?
Other financial metrics that can be useful for relative valuation.
|What is VAF's n/a Ratio?|
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Peers
How does VAF's PE Ratio compare to its peers?
|VAF PE Ratio vs Peers|
|Company||PE||Estimated Growth||Market Cap|
CHH Churchill China
LCUT Lifetime Brands
VAF Vista Alegre Atlantis SGPS
Price-To-Earnings vs Peers: VAF is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (69.2x) compared to the peer average (18.3x).
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry
How does VAF's PE Ratio compare vs other companies in the European Consumer Durables Industry?
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: VAF is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (69.2x) compared to the European Consumer Durables industry average (8.4x)
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio
What is VAF's PE Ratio compared to its Fair PE Ratio? This is the expected PE Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.
|Current PE Ratio||69.2x|
|Fair PE Ratio||n/a|
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: Insufficient data to calculate VAF's Price-To-Earnings Fair Ratio for valuation analysis.
Share Price vs Fair Value
What is the Fair Price of VAF when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.
Below Fair Value: VAF (€0.83) is trading below our estimate of fair value (€1.53)
Significantly Below Fair Value: VAF is trading below fair value by more than 20%.
Analyst Price Targets
What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?
Analyst Forecast: Target price is more than 20% higher than the current share price, but analysts are not within a statistically confident range of agreement.