Stock Analysis

Medicalgorithmics (WSE:MDG) Is Posting Solid Earnings, But It Is Not All Good News

WSE:MDG
Source: Shutterstock

Solid profit numbers didn't seem to be enough to please Medicalgorithmics S.A.'s (WSE:MDG) shareholders. Our analysis has found some concerning factors which weaken the profit's foundation.

View our latest analysis for Medicalgorithmics

earnings-and-revenue-history
WSE:MDG Earnings and Revenue History May 4th 2023

A Closer Look At Medicalgorithmics' Earnings

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

Over the twelve months to December 2022, Medicalgorithmics recorded an accrual ratio of 0.41. As a general rule, that bodes poorly for future profitability. To wit, the company did not generate one whit of free cashflow in that time. Over the last year it actually had negative free cash flow of zł6.0m, in contrast to the aforementioned profit of zł18.1m. We also note that Medicalgorithmics' free cash flow was actually negative last year as well, so we could understand if shareholders were bothered by its outflow of zł6.0m. Notably, the company has issued new shares, thus diluting existing shareholders and reducing their share of future earnings. One positive for Medicalgorithmics shareholders is that it's accrual ratio was significantly better last year, providing reason to believe that it may return to stronger cash conversion in the future. As a result, some shareholders may be looking for stronger cash conversion in the current year.

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Medicalgorithmics.

One essential aspect of assessing earnings quality is to look at how much a company is diluting shareholders. In fact, Medicalgorithmics increased the number of shares on issue by 100% over the last twelve months by issuing new shares. That means its earnings are split among a greater number of shares. To talk about net income, without noticing earnings per share, is to be distracted by the big numbers while ignoring the smaller numbers that talk to per share value. Check out Medicalgorithmics' historical EPS growth by clicking on this link.

A Look At The Impact Of Medicalgorithmics' Dilution On Its Earnings Per Share (EPS)

We don't have any data on the company's profits from three years ago. Zooming in to the last year, we still can't talk about growth rates coherently, since it made a loss last year. But mathematics aside, it is always good to see when a formerly unprofitable business come good (though we accept profit would have been higher if dilution had not been required). So you can see that the dilution has had a fairly significant impact on shareholders.

In the long term, if Medicalgorithmics' earnings per share can increase, then the share price should too. However, if its profit increases while its earnings per share stay flat (or even fall) then shareholders might not see much benefit. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.

Our Take On Medicalgorithmics' Profit Performance

In conclusion, Medicalgorithmics has weak cashflow relative to earnings, which indicates lower quality earnings, and the dilution means that shareholders now own a smaller proportion of the company (assuming they maintained the same number of shares). For all the reasons mentioned above, we think that, at a glance, Medicalgorithmics' statutory profits could be considered to be low quality, because they are likely to give investors an overly positive impression of the company. If you'd like to know more about Medicalgorithmics as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. For example, we've found that Medicalgorithmics has 4 warning signs (2 shouldn't be ignored!) that deserve your attention before going any further with your analysis.

Our examination of Medicalgorithmics has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.

Valuation is complex, but we're helping make it simple.

Find out whether Medicalgorithmics is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.

View the Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.