Stock Analysis

Is ESTsoft (KOSDAQ:047560) Using Debt Sensibly?

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that ESTsoft Corp. (KOSDAQ:047560) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

When Is Debt A Problem?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for ESTsoft

How Much Debt Does ESTsoft Carry?

As you can see below, ESTsoft had ₩29.9b of debt at June 2024, down from ₩42.9b a year prior. However, its balance sheet shows it holds ₩91.2b in cash, so it actually has ₩61.2b net cash.

debt-equity-history-analysis
KOSDAQ:A047560 Debt to Equity History September 26th 2024

A Look At ESTsoft's Liabilities

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that ESTsoft had liabilities of ₩64.6b due within 12 months and liabilities of ₩34.8b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of ₩91.2b as well as receivables valued at ₩15.0b due within 12 months. So it actually has ₩6.88b more liquid assets than total liabilities.

This surplus suggests that ESTsoft has a conservative balance sheet, and could probably eliminate its debt without much difficulty. Simply put, the fact that ESTsoft has more cash than debt is arguably a good indication that it can manage its debt safely. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since ESTsoft will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

In the last year ESTsoft wasn't profitable at an EBIT level, but managed to grow its revenue by 19%, to ₩102b. We usually like to see faster growth from unprofitable companies, but each to their own.

So How Risky Is ESTsoft?

Statistically speaking companies that lose money are riskier than those that make money. And we do note that ESTsoft had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss, over the last year. And over the same period it saw negative free cash outflow of ₩2.6b and booked a ₩13b accounting loss. While this does make the company a bit risky, it's important to remember it has net cash of ₩61.2b. That kitty means the company can keep spending for growth for at least two years, at current rates. Even though its balance sheet seems sufficiently liquid, debt always makes us a little nervous if a company doesn't produce free cash flow regularly. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with ESTsoft (including 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) .

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

Mobile Infrastructure for Defense and Disaster

The next wave in robotics isn't humanoid. Its fully autonomous towers delivering 5G, ISR, and radar in under 30 minutes, anywhere.

Get the investor briefing before the next round of contracts

Sponsored On Behalf of CiTech

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if ESTsoft might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About KOSDAQ:A047560

ESTsoft

Engages in the software business in South Korea.

Flawless balance sheet with reasonable growth potential.

Weekly Picks

AL
RKLB logo
AlexLovell on Rocket Lab ·

Early mover in a fast growing industry. Likely to experience share price volatility as they scale

Fair Value:US$16.25268.7% overvalued
31 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
13 users have liked this narrative
AG
Agricola
EXN logo
Agricola on Excellon Resources ·

A case for CA$31.80 (undiluted), aka 8,616% upside from CA$0.37 (an 86 bagger!).

Fair Value:CA$31.898.5% undervalued
38 users have followed this narrative
7 users have commented on this narrative
14 users have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentallySarcastic
CCP logo
FundamentallySarcastic on Credit Corp Group ·

Moderation and Stabilisation: HOLD: Fair Price based on a 4-year Cycle is $12.08

Fair Value:AU$12.6412.1% overvalued
7 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

JE
JeremyBeeAi
PSEC logo
JeremyBeeAi on Prospect Capital ·

Title: Market Sentiment Is Dead Wrong — Here's Why PSEC Deserves a Second Look

Fair Value:US$3.8934.4% undervalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
DA
davidlsander
QS logo
davidlsander on QuantumScape ·

An amazing opportunity to potentially get a 100 bagger

Fair Value:US$2555.9% undervalued
131 users have followed this narrative
10 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
YI
AMZN logo
yiannisz on Amazon.com ·

Amazon: Why the World’s Biggest Platform Still Runs on Invisible Economics

Fair Value:US$231.382.0% undervalued
6 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

RO
RockeTeller
SCZ logo
RockeTeller on Santacruz Silver Mining ·

Crazy Undervalued 42 Baggers Silver Play (Active & Running Mine)

Fair Value:CA$8686.7% undervalued
82 users have followed this narrative
8 users have commented on this narrative
23 users have liked this narrative
TH
TheWallstreetKing
MVIS logo
TheWallstreetKing on MicroVision ·

MicroVision will explode future revenue by 380.37% with a vision towards success

Fair Value:US$6098.5% undervalued
123 users have followed this narrative
11 users have commented on this narrative
22 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$250.3930.5% undervalued
975 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
26 users have liked this narrative