Is ESTsoft (KOSDAQ:047560) Using Debt Sensibly?

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that ESTsoft Corp. (KOSDAQ:047560) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for ESTsoft

How Much Debt Does ESTsoft Carry?

As you can see below, ESTsoft had ₩29.9b of debt at June 2024, down from ₩42.9b a year prior. However, its balance sheet shows it holds ₩91.2b in cash, so it actually has ₩61.2b net cash.

debt-equity-history-analysis
KOSDAQ:A047560 Debt to Equity History September 26th 2024

A Look At ESTsoft's Liabilities

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that ESTsoft had liabilities of ₩64.6b due within 12 months and liabilities of ₩34.8b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of ₩91.2b as well as receivables valued at ₩15.0b due within 12 months. So it actually has ₩6.88b more liquid assets than total liabilities.

This surplus suggests that ESTsoft has a conservative balance sheet, and could probably eliminate its debt without much difficulty. Simply put, the fact that ESTsoft has more cash than debt is arguably a good indication that it can manage its debt safely. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since ESTsoft will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

In the last year ESTsoft wasn't profitable at an EBIT level, but managed to grow its revenue by 19%, to ₩102b. We usually like to see faster growth from unprofitable companies, but each to their own.

So How Risky Is ESTsoft?

Statistically speaking companies that lose money are riskier than those that make money. And we do note that ESTsoft had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss, over the last year. And over the same period it saw negative free cash outflow of ₩2.6b and booked a ₩13b accounting loss. While this does make the company a bit risky, it's important to remember it has net cash of ₩61.2b. That kitty means the company can keep spending for growth for at least two years, at current rates. Even though its balance sheet seems sufficiently liquid, debt always makes us a little nervous if a company doesn't produce free cash flow regularly. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with ESTsoft (including 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) .

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if ESTsoft might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
179
ZO
zoe_vi5fn

Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

CO
connor_iwn1g

Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

Andrew Legget

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
10

About KOSDAQ:A047560

ESTsoft

Engages in the software business in South Korea.

Excellent balance sheet with very low risk.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
ONCY logo
Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

Fair Value:US$3.575.5% undervalued
31 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
Recommended Voice
META logo
tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

Fair Value:US$5861.4% undervalued
63 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
34 users have liked this narrative
TA
Talos
Emerging Author
VOYG logo
Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

Fair Value:US$385.291.1% undervalued
65 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
IV
Emerging Author
UBER logo
Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

Fair Value:US$11632.1% undervalued
13 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

RO
RockeTeller
KUYA logo
RockeTeller on Kuya Silver ·

Kuya Silver, The High-Octane Rocket With 15,372 g/t Silver + $12 AISC

Fair Value:CA$10.8493.3% undervalued
10 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
1 users have liked this narrative
RO
Robbo
ULVR logo
Robbo on Unilever ·

Unilever (LSE:ULVR), changes in the wind.

Fair Value:UK£42.2813.0% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
DSK logo
tripledub on Dusk Group ·

Buying a Dollar for Fifty Cents: The Case for Dusk Group

Fair Value:AU$0.790.6% undervalued
24 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
363 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9122.3% overvalued
212 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
Emerging Author
MELI logo
John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

Fair Value:US$7.31k73.1% undervalued
125 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion