Solid Earnings May Not Tell The Whole Story For Daehan NupharmLtd (KOSDAQ:054670)

Simply Wall St

Daehan Nupharm Co.,Ltd.'s (KOSDAQ:054670) healthy profit numbers didn't contain any surprises for investors. We believe that shareholders have noticed some concerning factors beyond the statutory profit numbers.

KOSDAQ:A054670 Earnings and Revenue History November 20th 2025

Examining Cashflow Against Daehan NupharmLtd's Earnings

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

Over the twelve months to September 2025, Daehan NupharmLtd recorded an accrual ratio of 0.32. Therefore, we know that it's free cashflow was significantly lower than its statutory profit, raising questions about how useful that profit figure really is. Even though it reported a profit of ₩10.9b, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through ₩43b in the last year. We also note that Daehan NupharmLtd's free cash flow was actually negative last year as well, so we could understand if shareholders were bothered by its outflow of ₩43b. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

See our latest analysis for Daehan NupharmLtd

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Daehan NupharmLtd.

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

The fact that the company had unusual items boosting profit by ₩2.4b, in the last year, probably goes some way to explain why its accrual ratio was so weak. While it's always nice to have higher profit, a large contribution from unusual items sometimes dampens our enthusiasm. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. Assuming those unusual items don't show up again in the current year, we'd thus expect profit to be weaker next year (in the absence of business growth, that is).

Our Take On Daehan NupharmLtd's Profit Performance

Daehan NupharmLtd had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. For the reasons mentioned above, we think that a perfunctory glance at Daehan NupharmLtd's statutory profits might make it look better than it really is on an underlying level. If you want to do dive deeper into Daehan NupharmLtd, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Daehan NupharmLtd (2 are a bit unpleasant) you should be familiar with.

In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Daehan NupharmLtd might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.