What underlying fundamental trends can indicate that a company might be in decline? Typically, we'll see the trend of both return on capital employed (ROCE) declining and this usually coincides with a decreasing amount of capital employed. This reveals that the company isn't compounding shareholder wealth because returns are falling and its net asset base is shrinking. So after glancing at the trends within ASIA SEEDLtd (KOSDAQ:154030), we weren't too hopeful.
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for ASIA SEEDLtd:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
0.016 = ₩401m ÷ (₩43b - ₩18b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2025).
So, ASIA SEEDLtd has an ROCE of 1.6%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Food industry average of 6.8%.
View our latest analysis for ASIA SEEDLtd
Historical performance is a great place to start when researching a stock so above you can see the gauge for ASIA SEEDLtd's ROCE against it's prior returns. If you're interested in investigating ASIA SEEDLtd's past further, check out this free graph covering ASIA SEEDLtd's past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us
We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at ASIA SEEDLtd. To be more specific, the ROCE was 3.0% five years ago, but since then it has dropped noticeably. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. Since returns are falling and the business has the same amount of assets employed, this can suggest it's a mature business that hasn't had much growth in the last five years. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on ASIA SEEDLtd becoming one if things continue as they have.
Another thing to note, ASIA SEEDLtd has a high ratio of current liabilities to total assets of 42%. This effectively means that suppliers (or short-term creditors) are funding a large portion of the business, so just be aware that this can introduce some elements of risk. While it's not necessarily a bad thing, it can be beneficial if this ratio is lower.
What We Can Learn From ASIA SEEDLtd's ROCE
All in all, the lower returns from the same amount of capital employed aren't exactly signs of a compounding machine. Unsurprisingly then, the stock has dived 75% over the last five years, so investors are recognizing these changes and don't like the company's prospects. With underlying trends that aren't great in these areas, we'd consider looking elsewhere.
On a separate note, we've found 3 warning signs for ASIA SEEDLtd you'll probably want to know about.
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.
Discover if ASIA SEEDLtd might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.
Access Free AnalysisHave feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.