Stock Analysis

Here's Why TECHNOLOGIES (TSE:5248) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

TSE:5248
Source: Shutterstock

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that TECHNOLOGIES, Inc. (TSE:5248) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

Check out our latest analysis for TECHNOLOGIES

What Is TECHNOLOGIES's Net Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at October 2023 TECHNOLOGIES had debt of JP¥9.16b, up from JP¥197.0m in one year. However, it also had JP¥3.08b in cash, and so its net debt is JP¥6.09b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
TSE:5248 Debt to Equity History March 5th 2024

How Strong Is TECHNOLOGIES' Balance Sheet?

According to the last reported balance sheet, TECHNOLOGIES had liabilities of JP¥6.93b due within 12 months, and liabilities of JP¥6.66b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of JP¥3.08b and JP¥583.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total JP¥9.93b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of JP¥13.7b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

TECHNOLOGIES's net debt to EBITDA ratio is 34.4 which suggests rather high debt levels, but its interest cover of 8.9 times suggests the debt is easily serviced. Overall we'd say it seems likely the company is carrying a fairly heavy swag of debt. Pleasingly, TECHNOLOGIES is growing its EBIT faster than former Australian PM Bob Hawke downs a yard glass, boasting a 206% gain in the last twelve months. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since TECHNOLOGIES will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, TECHNOLOGIES recorded negative free cash flow, in total. Debt is far more risky for companies with unreliable free cash flow, so shareholders should be hoping that the past expenditure will produce free cash flow in the future.

Our View

Neither TECHNOLOGIES's ability handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, nor its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But its EBIT growth rate tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that TECHNOLOGIES is taking some risks with its use of debt. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 5 warning signs for TECHNOLOGIES you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit unpleasant.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

Valuation is complex, but we're helping make it simple.

Find out whether TECHNOLOGIES is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.

View the Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.