KLab Valuation

Is 3656 undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?

Valuation Score

1/6

Valuation Score 1/6

Below Fair Value
Significantly Below Fair Value
Price-To-Sales vs Peers
Price-To-Sales vs Industry
Price-To-Sales vs Fair Ratio
Analyst Forecast

Share Price vs Fair Value

What is the Fair Price of 3656 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

Ultimate guide to DCF valuation for stock investing

Learn how to determine fair value like the best investors in the world.

Below Fair Value: Insufficient data to calculate 3656's fair value for valuation analysis.

Significantly Below Fair Value: Insufficient data to calculate 3656's fair value for valuation analysis.

Key Valuation Metric

Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for 3656?

Key metric: As 3656 is unprofitable we use its Price-To-Sales Ratio for relative valuation analysis.

The above table shows the Price to Sales ratio for 3656. This is calculated by dividing 3656's market cap by their current revenue.
What is 3656's PS Ratio?
PS Ratio	3x
Sales	JP¥7.18b
Market Cap	JP¥21.98b

3656 key valuation metrics and ratios. From Price to Earnings, Price to Sales and Price to Book to Price to Earnings Growth Ratio, Enterprise Value and EBITDA.
Key Statistics
Enterprise Value/Revenue	2.8x
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	-17.3x
PEG Ratio	n/a

Price to Sales Ratio vs Peers

How does 3656's PS Ratio compare to its peers?

The above table shows the PS ratio for 3656 vs its peers. Here we also display the market cap and forecasted growth for additional consideration.
Company	Forward PS	Estimated Growth	Market Cap
Peer Average	3.1x
3903 gumi	2.6x	n/a	JP¥18.4b
3662 Ateam Holdings	1x	n/a	JP¥23.0b
4393 Bank of InnovationInc	2x	n/a	JP¥23.8b
3723 Nihon Falcom	6.8x	n/a	JP¥17.5b
3656 KLab	3x	n/a	JP¥22.0b

Price-To-Sales vs Peers: 3656 is good value based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (3x) compared to the peer average (3.1x).

Historical Price to Sales Ratio

Historical Price to Sales Ratio compares a stock's price to its sales over time. Higher ratios indicate that investors are willing to pay more for the stock.

Fetching historical data

Price to Sales Ratio vs Industry

How does 3656's PS Ratio compare vs other companies in the JP Entertainment Industry?

1 Company	Price / Sales	Estimated Growth	Market Cap
2402 amana	0.1x	n/a	US$11.46m

No more companies available in this PS range

1 Company		Estimated Growth	Market Cap

No more companies

Price-To-Sales vs Industry: 3656 is expensive based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (3x) compared to the JP Entertainment industry average (1.3x).

Price to Sales Ratio vs Fair Ratio

What is 3656's PS Ratio compared to its Fair PS Ratio? This is the expected PS Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.

3656 PS Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PS Ratio	3x
Fair PS Ratio	n/a

Price-To-Sales vs Fair Ratio: Insufficient data to calculate 3656's Price-To-Sales Fair Ratio for valuation analysis.

Analyst Price Targets

What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?

Analyst Forecast: Insufficient data to show price forecast.

Discover undervalued companies

Company Analysis and Financial Data Status

Data	Last Updated (UTC time)
Company Analysis	2026/01/06 10:26
End of Day Share Price	2026/01/06 00:00
Earnings	2025/09/30
Annual Earnings	2024/12/31

Data Sources

The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.

Package	Data	Timeframe	Example US Source ^*
Company Financials	10 years	Income statement Cash flow statement Balance sheet	SEC Form 10-K SEC Form 10-Q
Analyst Consensus Estimates	+3 years	Forecast financials Analyst price targets	Analyst Research Reports Blue Matrix
Market Prices	30 years	Stock prices Dividends, Splits and Actions	ICE Market Data SEC Form S-1
Ownership	10 years	Top shareholders Insider trading	SEC Form 4 SEC Form 13D
Management	10 years	Leadership team Board of directors	SEC Form 10-K SEC Form DEF 14A
Key Developments	10 years	Company announcements	SEC Form 8-K

^* Example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.

Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more.

Analysis Model and Snowflake

Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.

Learn about the world class team who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.

Industry and Sector Metrics

Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on Github.

Analyst Sources

KLab Inc. is covered by 5 analysts. 0 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.

Analyst	Institution
Koki Shiraishi	Daiwa Securities Co. Ltd.
Yasuyoshi Mimura	Ichiyoshi Research Institute Inc.
Tomoya Nakajima	Marusan Securities Co. Ltd.