Stock Analysis

Earnings Working Against JFE Holdings, Inc.'s (TSE:5411) Share Price

TSE:5411
Source: Shutterstock

With a price-to-earnings (or "P/E") ratio of 8.2x JFE Holdings, Inc. (TSE:5411) may be sending bullish signals at the moment, given that almost half of all companies in Japan have P/E ratios greater than 15x and even P/E's higher than 23x are not unusual. However, the P/E might be low for a reason and it requires further investigation to determine if it's justified.

JFE Holdings could be doing better as its earnings have been going backwards lately while most other companies have been seeing positive earnings growth. It seems that many are expecting the dour earnings performance to persist, which has repressed the P/E. If this is the case, then existing shareholders will probably struggle to get excited about the future direction of the share price.

See our latest analysis for JFE Holdings

pe-multiple-vs-industry
TSE:5411 Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry April 29th 2024
Want the full picture on analyst estimates for the company? Then our free report on JFE Holdings will help you uncover what's on the horizon.

How Is JFE Holdings' Growth Trending?

There's an inherent assumption that a company should underperform the market for P/E ratios like JFE Holdings' to be considered reasonable.

Retrospectively, the last year delivered a frustrating 16% decrease to the company's bottom line. Unfortunately, that's brought it right back to where it started three years ago with EPS growth being virtually non-existent overall during that time. Accordingly, shareholders probably wouldn't have been overly satisfied with the unstable medium-term growth rates.

Shifting to the future, estimates from the nine analysts covering the company suggest earnings should grow by 6.5% each year over the next three years. With the market predicted to deliver 11% growth each year, the company is positioned for a weaker earnings result.

In light of this, it's understandable that JFE Holdings' P/E sits below the majority of other companies. Apparently many shareholders weren't comfortable holding on while the company is potentially eyeing a less prosperous future.

The Key Takeaway

It's argued the price-to-earnings ratio is an inferior measure of value within certain industries, but it can be a powerful business sentiment indicator.

As we suspected, our examination of JFE Holdings' analyst forecasts revealed that its inferior earnings outlook is contributing to its low P/E. At this stage investors feel the potential for an improvement in earnings isn't great enough to justify a higher P/E ratio. Unless these conditions improve, they will continue to form a barrier for the share price around these levels.

You always need to take note of risks, for example - JFE Holdings has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

If you're unsure about the strength of JFE Holdings' business, why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals for some other companies you may have missed.

Valuation is complex, but we're helping make it simple.

Find out whether JFE Holdings is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.

View the Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.