Techno Ryowa Valuation

Is 1965 undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?

Valuation Score

1/6

Valuation Score 1/6

Below Fair Value
Significantly Below Fair Value
Price-To-Earnings vs Peers
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio
Analyst Forecast

Share Price vs Fair Value

What is the Fair Price of 1965 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

Below Fair Value: 1965 (¥2357) is trading above our estimate of fair value (¥1737.22)

Significantly Below Fair Value: 1965 is trading above our estimate of fair value.

Key Valuation Metric

Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for 1965?

Key metric: As 1965 is profitable we use its Price-To-Earnings Ratio for relative valuation analysis.

The above table shows the Price to Earnings ratio for 1965. This is calculated by dividing 1965's market cap by their current earnings.
What is 1965's PE Ratio?
PE Ratio	10x
Earnings	JP¥4.95b
Market Cap	JP¥49.59b

1965 key valuation metrics and ratios. From Price to Earnings, Price to Sales and Price to Book to Price to Earnings Growth Ratio, Enterprise Value and EBITDA.
Key Statistics
Enterprise Value/Revenue	0.5x
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	5.6x
PEG Ratio	n/a

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Peers

How does 1965's PE Ratio compare to its peers?

The above table shows the PE ratio for 1965 vs its peers. Here we also display the market cap and forecasted growth for additional consideration.
Company	Forward PE	Estimated Growth	Market Cap
Peer Average	8.4x
1975 Asahi Kogyosha	10.8x	n/a	JP¥48.2b
3431 Miyaji Engineering GroupInc	10.6x	n/a	JP¥51.4b
3443 Kawada Technologies	4.7x	-8.3%	JP¥46.7b
1871 PS Construction	7.3x	n/a	JP¥48.7b
1965 Techno Ryowa	10x	n/a	JP¥49.6b

Price-To-Earnings vs Peers: 1965 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (10x) compared to the peer average (8.4x).

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry

How does 1965's PE Ratio compare vs other companies in the JP Construction Industry?

0 Companies	Price / Earnings	Estimated Growth	Market Cap

No more companies available in this PE range

0 Companies		Estimated Growth	Market Cap

No more companies

Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: 1965 is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (10x) compared to the JP Construction industry average (11.3x).

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio

What is 1965's PE Ratio compared to its Fair PE Ratio? This is the expected PE Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.

1965 PE Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PE Ratio	10x
Fair PE Ratio	n/a

Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: Insufficient data to calculate 1965's Price-To-Earnings Fair Ratio for valuation analysis.

Analyst Price Targets

What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?

Analyst Forecast: Insufficient data to show price forecast.

Discover undervalued companies

Mitsubishi

JP¥10.3t

Engages in the natural gas, industrial materials and infrastructure, chemicals, mineral resources, automotive and mobility, food and consumer industry, power solution, and urban development businesses worldwide.

8058

JP¥2,646.50

-2.0%

12.3%

Terasaki ElectricLtd

JP¥28.0b

Manufactures and sells marine and industrial systems, circuit breakers, and medical devices in Japan and internationally.

6637

JP¥2,150.00

0.5%

43.4%

AeroEdge

JP¥6.8b

Manufactures and sells aerospace engine parts in Japan.

7409

JP¥1,760.00

-5.4%

-57.7%