What To Know Before Buying BasicNet S.p.A. (BIT:BAN) For Its Dividend

Dividend paying stocks like BasicNet S.p.A. (BIT:BAN) tend to be popular with investors, and for good reason - some research suggests a significant amount of all stock market returns come from reinvested dividends. Yet sometimes, investors buy a stock for its dividend and lose money because the share price falls by more than they earned in dividend payments.

A 1.3% yield is nothing to get excited about, but investors probably think the long payment history suggests BasicNet has some staying power. The company also bought back stock during the year, equivalent to approximately 1.3% of the company's market capitalisation at the time. Some simple research can reduce the risk of buying BasicNet for its dividend - read on to learn more.

Click the interactive chart for our full dividend analysis

historic-dividend
BIT:BAN Historic Dividend April 30th 2021
Advertisement

Payout ratios

Dividends are usually paid out of company earnings. If a company is paying more than it earns, then the dividend might become unsustainable - hardly an ideal situation. So we need to form a view on if a company's dividend is sustainable, relative to its net profit after tax. Looking at the data, we can see that 37% of BasicNet's profits were paid out as dividends in the last 12 months. A medium payout ratio strikes a good balance between paying dividends, and keeping enough back to invest in the business. Besides, if reinvestment opportunities dry up, the company has room to increase the dividend.

We also measure dividends paid against a company's levered free cash flow, to see if enough cash was generated to cover the dividend. BasicNet paid out 20% of its free cash flow as dividends last year, which is conservative and suggests the dividend is sustainable. It's encouraging to see that the dividend is covered by both profit and cash flow. This generally suggests the dividend is sustainable, as long as earnings don't drop precipitously.

Consider getting our latest analysis on BasicNet's financial position here.

Dividend Volatility

Before buying a stock for its income, we want to see if the dividends have been stable in the past, and if the company has a track record of maintaining its dividend. For the purpose of this article, we only scrutinise the last decade of BasicNet's dividend payments. This dividend has been unstable, which we define as having been cut one or more times over this time. During the past 10-year period, the first annual payment was €0.05 in 2011, compared to €0.06 last year. This works out to be a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 1.8% a year over that time. BasicNet's dividend payments have fluctuated, so it hasn't grown 1.8% every year, but the CAGR is a useful rule of thumb for approximating the historical growth.

We're glad to see the dividend has risen, but with a limited rate of growth and fluctuations in the payments, we don't think this is an attractive combination.

Dividend Growth Potential

With a relatively unstable dividend, it's even more important to evaluate if earnings per share (EPS) are growing - it's not worth taking the risk on a dividend getting cut, unless you might be rewarded with larger dividends in future. BasicNet's EPS have fallen by approximately 11% per year during the past five years. A sharp decline in earnings per share is not great from from a dividend perspective, as even conservative payout ratios can come under pressure if earnings fall far enough.

Conclusion

Dividend investors should always want to know if a) a company's dividends are affordable, b) if there is a track record of consistent payments, and c) if the dividend is capable of growing. Firstly, we like that BasicNet has low and conservative payout ratios. Earnings per share are down, and BasicNet's dividend has been cut at least once in the past, which is disappointing. In sum, we find it hard to get excited about BasicNet from a dividend perspective. It's not that we think it's a bad business; just that there are other companies that perform better on these criteria.

It's important to note that companies having a consistent dividend policy will generate greater investor confidence than those having an erratic one. Meanwhile, despite the importance of dividend payments, they are not the only factors our readers should know when assessing a company. For instance, we've picked out 4 warning signs for BasicNet that investors should take into consideration.

We have also put together a list of global stocks with a market capitalisation above $1bn and yielding more 3%.

When trading BasicNet or any other investment, use the platform considered by many to be the Professional's Gateway to the Worlds Market, Interactive Brokers. You get the lowest-cost* trading on stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds worldwide from a single integrated account. Promoted


Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if BasicNet might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
*Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020


Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

Gold miners still look inexpensive because the market thinks we're near the top of the cycle. Given what's happening to the dollar, I'm not so sure.

Gold miners still look inexpensive because the market thinks we're near the top of the cycle. Given what's happening to the dollar, I'm not so sure. cover
2018
ST
steve_investor

Is it a safer bet on gold to have just exposure to ETFs?

MA
marcus_l38oa

Between 2003 and 2011, gold nearly went 5x. Dollar went weak too. The gold companies did bad. It is worth noting that between 2003 and 2011, there was 2008! I will leave it your inference and research.

About BIT:BAN

BasicNet

Operates in the sports and casual clothing, footwear, and accessories sectors in Europe, the Americas, Asia, Oceania, the Middle East, and Africa.

Low risk with imperfect balance sheet.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$522.0% undervalued
62 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
MELI logo
John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

Fair Value:US$7.31k73.7% undervalued
111 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative
RC
PYPL logo
rcb9 on PayPal Holdings ·

Ten Percent More Volume, One Percent More Transaction Margin

Fair Value:US$70.8913.2% undervalued
17 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
HE
HedgeY
MU logo
HedgeY on Micron Technology ·

Micron - The Memory Bottleneck Behind the AI Supercycle

Fair Value:US$1.25k22.7% undervalued
46 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

AL
BUSER logo
AlfredB on Bambuser ·

The Market is Asleep on Bambuser ...A Forensic Look at a Textbook SaaS Turnaround and AI Pivot

Fair Value:SEK 14684.7% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AN
andre_santos
MCD logo
andre_santos on McDonald's ·

McDonald's - A Fundamental Valuation

Fair Value:US$233.6716.0% overvalued
39 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
OL
ETN logo
OLetourneau on Eaton ·

Electrical Infrastructure Rail

Fair Value:US$37711.2% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28023.3% undervalued
342 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9115.1% overvalued
192 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0945.6% undervalued
219 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

HA
HarishPK
EVER logo
HarishPK on EverQuote ·

Feedback welcome!

3
|
0
MA
MRNA logo
Madave on Moderna ·

Aged like wine

2
|
0