TVS Electronics (NSE:TVSELECT) Has Announced That Its Dividend Will Be Reduced To ₹1.00

TVS Electronics Limited's (NSE:TVSELECT) dividend is being reduced from last year's payment covering the same period to ₹1.00 on the 9th of September. This means that the dividend yield is 0.3%, which is a bit low when comparing to other companies in the industry.

View our latest analysis for TVS Electronics

Advertisement

TVS Electronics Doesn't Earn Enough To Cover Its Payments

If it is predictable over a long period, even low dividend yields can be attractive. Prior to this announcement, the dividend made up 667% of earnings, and the company was generating negative free cash flows. This high of a dividend payment could start to put pressure on the balance sheet in the future.

Looking forward, EPS could fall by 51.3% if the company can't turn things around from the last few years. If the dividend continues along recent trends, we estimate the payout ratio could reach 1,439%, which could put the dividend in jeopardy if the company's earnings don't improve.

historic-dividend
NSEI:TVSELECT Historic Dividend July 4th 2024

TVS Electronics' Dividend Has Lacked Consistency

Looking back, TVS Electronics' dividend hasn't been particularly consistent. This makes us cautious about the consistency of the dividend over a full economic cycle. The annual payment during the last 7 years was ₹0.50 in 2017, and the most recent fiscal year payment was ₹1.00. This means that it has been growing its distributions at 10% per annum over that time. Dividends have grown rapidly over this time, but with cuts in the past we are not certain that this stock will be a reliable source of income in the future.

The Dividend Has Limited Growth Potential

Growing earnings per share could be a mitigating factor when considering the past fluctuations in the dividend. TVS Electronics' EPS has fallen by approximately 51% per year during the past five years. Such rapid declines definitely have the potential to constrain dividend payments if the trend continues into the future.

We're Not Big Fans Of TVS Electronics' Dividend

Overall, the dividend looks like it may have been a bit high, which explains why it has now been cut. The company seems to be stretching itself a bit to make such big payments, but it doesn't appear they can be consistent over time. The dividend doesn't inspire confidence that it will provide solid income in the future.

Companies possessing a stable dividend policy will likely enjoy greater investor interest than those suffering from a more inconsistent approach. At the same time, there are other factors our readers should be conscious of before pouring capital into a stock. Just as an example, we've come across 3 warning signs for TVS Electronics you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant. Looking for more high-yielding dividend ideas? Try our collection of strong dividend payers.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if TVS Electronics might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
88
ZO
zoe_vi5fn

Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

CO
connor_iwn1g

Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

Andrew Legget

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
10

About NSEI:TVSELECT

TVS Electronics

Through its subsidiaries, operates as an integrated technology solutions company in India.

Low risk with imperfect balance sheet.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
ONCY logo
Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

Fair Value:US$3.575.7% undervalued
22 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
Recommended Voice
META logo
tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

Fair Value:US$5862.5% undervalued
59 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
34 users have liked this narrative
TA
Talos
Emerging Author
VOYG logo
Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

Fair Value:US$385.291.0% undervalued
58 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
IV
Emerging Author
UBER logo
Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

Fair Value:US$11633.7% undervalued
11 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

LU
LunaRodas
FRO logo
LunaRodas on Frontline ·

FRO | Frontline: What They Said vs. What They Did

Fair Value:US$34.0728.4% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
JU
BBWI logo
julio on Bath & Body Works ·

BBWI VALUATION

Fair Value:US$39.7853.1% undervalued
23 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
JU
INTC logo
julio on Intel ·

INTC VALUATION

Fair Value:US$42.88114.8% overvalued
36 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28018.6% undervalued
365 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9120.3% overvalued
213 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0946.1% undervalued
237 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative