- Israel
- /
- Hospitality
- /
- TASE:FTAL
Fattal Holdings (1998) Ltd (TLV:FTAL) Could Be Riskier Than It Looks
With a median price-to-sales (or "P/S") ratio of close to 1.4x in the Hospitality industry in Israel, you could be forgiven for feeling indifferent about Fattal Holdings (1998) Ltd's (TLV:FTAL) P/S ratio of 1x. While this might not raise any eyebrows, if the P/S ratio is not justified investors could be missing out on a potential opportunity or ignoring looming disappointment.
See our latest analysis for Fattal Holdings (1998)
What Does Fattal Holdings (1998)'s P/S Mean For Shareholders?
The revenue growth achieved at Fattal Holdings (1998) over the last year would be more than acceptable for most companies. One possibility is that the P/S is moderate because investors think this respectable revenue growth might not be enough to outperform the broader industry in the near future. Those who are bullish on Fattal Holdings (1998) will be hoping that this isn't the case, so that they can pick up the stock at a lower valuation.
Although there are no analyst estimates available for Fattal Holdings (1998), take a look at this free data-rich visualisation to see how the company stacks up on earnings, revenue and cash flow.What Are Revenue Growth Metrics Telling Us About The P/S?
Fattal Holdings (1998)'s P/S ratio would be typical for a company that's only expected to deliver moderate growth, and importantly, perform in line with the industry.
Retrospectively, the last year delivered a decent 10% gain to the company's revenues. The latest three year period has also seen an excellent 218% overall rise in revenue, aided somewhat by its short-term performance. So we can start by confirming that the company has done a great job of growing revenues over that time.
When compared to the industry's one-year growth forecast of 18%, the most recent medium-term revenue trajectory is noticeably more alluring
In light of this, it's curious that Fattal Holdings (1998)'s P/S sits in line with the majority of other companies. Apparently some shareholders believe the recent performance is at its limits and have been accepting lower selling prices.
The Key Takeaway
While the price-to-sales ratio shouldn't be the defining factor in whether you buy a stock or not, it's quite a capable barometer of revenue expectations.
We didn't quite envision Fattal Holdings (1998)'s P/S sitting in line with the wider industry, considering the revenue growth over the last three-year is higher than the current industry outlook. When we see strong revenue with faster-than-industry growth, we can only assume potential risks are what might be placing pressure on the P/S ratio. While recent revenue trends over the past medium-term suggest that the risk of a price decline is low, investors appear to see the likelihood of revenue fluctuations in the future.
You always need to take note of risks, for example - Fattal Holdings (1998) has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
If companies with solid past earnings growth is up your alley, you may wish to see this free collection of other companies with strong earnings growth and low P/E ratios.
New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts
Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.
• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies
Or build your own from over 50 metrics.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
About TASE:FTAL
Fattal Holdings (1998)
Owns and operates hotels in Israel and internationally.
Low risk and slightly overvalued.
Market Insights
Weekly Picks

The "Physical AI" Monopoly – A New Industrial Revolution
Czechoslovak Group - is it really so hot?

The Compound Effect: From Acquisition to Integration
Recently Updated Narratives

Inotiv NAMs Test Center
Proximus: The State-Backed Backup Plan with 7% Gross Yield and 15% Currency Upside.

Spotify - A Fundamental and Historical Valuation
Popular Narratives

Is Ubisoft the Market’s Biggest Pricing Error? Why Forensic Value Points to €33 Per Share
Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026
Trending Discussion
When was the last time that Tesla delivered on its promises? Lets go through the list! The last successful would be the Tesla Model 3 which was 2019 with first deliveries 2017. Roadster not shipped. Tesla Cybertruck global roll out failed. They might have a bunch of prototypes (that are being controlled remotely) And you think they'll be able to ship something as complicated as a robot? It's a pure speculation buy.
This article completely disregards (ignores, forgets) how far China is in this field. If Tesla continues on this path, they will be fighting for their lives trying to sell $40000 dollar robots that can do less than a $10000 dollar one from China will do. Fair value of Tesla? It has always been a hype stock with a valuation completely unbased in reality. Your guess is as good as mine, but especially after the carbon credit scheme got canned, it is downwards of $150.
