- Hong Kong
- /
- Water Utilities
- /
- SEHK:1395
We Think ELL Environmental Holdings (HKG:1395) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that ELL Environmental Holdings Limited (HKG:1395) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
Check out our latest analysis for ELL Environmental Holdings
What Is ELL Environmental Holdings's Net Debt?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2022 ELL Environmental Holdings had HK$117.2m of debt, an increase on HK$66.4m, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of HK$21.4m, its net debt is less, at about HK$95.8m.
A Look At ELL Environmental Holdings' Liabilities
The latest balance sheet data shows that ELL Environmental Holdings had liabilities of HK$148.8m due within a year, and liabilities of HK$36.4m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had HK$21.4m in cash and HK$26.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by HK$137.9m.
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of HK$210.4m. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
ELL Environmental Holdings has net debt to EBITDA of 2.9 suggesting it uses a fair bit of leverage to boost returns. But the high interest coverage of 7.2 suggests it can easily service that debt. Pleasingly, ELL Environmental Holdings is growing its EBIT faster than former Australian PM Bob Hawke downs a yard glass, boasting a 402% gain in the last twelve months. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since ELL Environmental Holdings will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. In the last three years, ELL Environmental Holdings created free cash flow amounting to 6.4% of its EBIT, an uninspiring performance. For us, cash conversion that low sparks a little paranoia about is ability to extinguish debt.
Our View
On our analysis ELL Environmental Holdings's EBIT growth rate should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. For example, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow makes us a little nervous about its debt. It's also worth noting that ELL Environmental Holdings is in the Water Utilities industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. When we consider all the factors mentioned above, we do feel a bit cautious about ELL Environmental Holdings's use of debt. While debt does have its upside in higher potential returns, we think shareholders should definitely consider how debt levels might make the stock more risky. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 1 warning sign with ELL Environmental Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.
Discover if ELL Environmental Holdings might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.
Access Free AnalysisHave feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
About SEHK:1395
ELL Environmental Holdings
An investment holding company, designs, constructs, operates, and maintains wastewater treatment facilities in the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong, and Indonesia.
Very low and overvalued.