Stock Analysis

Hong Kong Economic Times Holdings (HKG:423) Will Pay A Larger Dividend Than Last Year At HK$0.065

SEHK:423
Source: Shutterstock

Hong Kong Economic Times Holdings Limited (HKG:423) has announced that it will be increasing its dividend from last year's comparable payment on the 9th of September to HK$0.065. This makes the dividend yield 7.8%, which is above the industry average.

Check out our latest analysis for Hong Kong Economic Times Holdings

Hong Kong Economic Times Holdings Doesn't Earn Enough To Cover Its Payments

If the payments aren't sustainable, a high yield for a few years won't matter that much. Prior to this announcement, the company was paying out 124% of what it was earning and 94% of cash flows. This indicates that the company could be more focused on returning cash to shareholders than reinvesting to grow the business.

EPS is set to grow by 2.8% over the next year if recent trends continue. If the dividend continues on its recent course, the payout ratio in 12 months could be 122%, which is a bit high and could start applying pressure to the balance sheet.

historic-dividend
SEHK:423 Historic Dividend August 12th 2022

Dividend Volatility

While the company has been paying a dividend for a long time, it has cut the dividend at least once in the last 10 years. The annual payment during the last 10 years was HK$0.209 in 2012, and the most recent fiscal year payment was HK$0.095. The dividend has shrunk at around 7.6% a year during that period. Declining dividends isn't generally what we look for as they can indicate that the company is running into some challenges.

The Dividend's Growth Prospects Are Limited

Dividends have been going in the wrong direction, so we definitely want to see a different trend in the earnings per share. Earnings has been rising at 2.8% per annum over the last five years, which admittedly is a bit slow. The company is paying out a lot of its profits, even though it is growing those profits pretty slowly. As they say in finance, 'past performance is not indicative of future performance', but we are not confident a company with limited earnings growth and a high payout ratio will be a star dividend-payer over the next decade.

Hong Kong Economic Times Holdings' Dividend Doesn't Look Sustainable

In summary, while it's always good to see the dividend being raised, we don't think Hong Kong Economic Times Holdings' payments are rock solid. The payments are bit high to be considered sustainable, and the track record isn't the best. We would probably look elsewhere for an income investment.

Companies possessing a stable dividend policy will likely enjoy greater investor interest than those suffering from a more inconsistent approach. However, there are other things to consider for investors when analysing stock performance. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Hong Kong Economic Times Holdings (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) you should know about. If you are a dividend investor, you might also want to look at our curated list of high yield dividend stocks.

Valuation is complex, but we're helping make it simple.

Find out whether Hong Kong Economic Times Holdings is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.

View the Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.