Brederode Valuation

Is 0QWB undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?

Valuation Score

4/6

Valuation Score 4/6

  • Below Fair Value

  • Significantly Below Fair Value

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Peers

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Industry

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio

  • Analyst Forecast

Share Price vs Fair Value

What is the Fair Price of 0QWB when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

Below Fair Value: 0QWB (€105.2) is trading below our estimate of fair value (€145.23)

Significantly Below Fair Value: 0QWB is trading below fair value by more than 20%.


Key Valuation Metric

Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for 0QWB?

Key metric: As 0QWB is profitable we use its Price-To-Earnings Ratio for relative valuation analysis.

The above table shows the Price to Earnings ratio for 0QWB. This is calculated by dividing 0QWB's market cap by their current earnings.
What is 0QWB's PE Ratio?
PE Ratio11.4x
Earnings€272.37m
Market Cap€3.10b

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Peers

How does 0QWB's PE Ratio compare to its peers?

The above table shows the PE ratio for 0QWB vs its peers. Here we also display the market cap and forecasted growth for additional consideration.
CompanyForward PEEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
Peer Average13.1x
RCP RIT Capital Partners
11.3xn/aUK£2.7b
HICL HICL Infrastructure
23xn/aUK£2.4b
CLDN Caledonia Investments
8.8xn/aUK£1.8b
EMG Man Group
9.6x15.0%UK£2.4b
0QWB Brederode
11.4xn/a€3.1b

Price-To-Earnings vs Peers: 0QWB is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (11.4x) compared to the peer average (13.1x).


Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry

How does 0QWB's PE Ratio compare vs other companies in the GB Capital Markets Industry?

4 CompaniesPrice / EarningsEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
PNIX Phoenix Digital Assets
1.2xn/aUS$34.29m
IX. i(x) Net Zero
0.1xn/aUS$8.94m
APQ APQ Global
0.4xn/aUS$5.78m
MAFL Mineral & Financial Investments
2xn/aUS$5.00m
No more companies available in this PE range
0QWB 11.4xIndustry Avg. 12.2xNo. of Companies19PE01020304050+
4 CompaniesEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
No more companies

Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: 0QWB is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (11.4x) compared to the UK Capital Markets industry average (12.2x).


Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio

What is 0QWB's PE Ratio compared to its Fair PE Ratio? This is the expected PE Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.

0QWB PE Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PE Ratio11.4x
Fair PE Ration/a

Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: Insufficient data to calculate 0QWB's Price-To-Earnings Fair Ratio for valuation analysis.


Analyst Price Targets

What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?

The above table shows the analyst 0QWB forecast and predictions for the stock price in 12 month’s time.
DateShare PriceAverage 1Y Price TargetDispersionHighLow1Y Actual priceAnalysts
Current€105.20
€127.00
+20.7%
1.6%€129.00€125.00n/a2
Nov ’25€107.00
€127.00
+18.7%
1.6%€129.00€125.00n/a2
Oct ’25€113.00
€127.00
+12.4%
1.6%€129.00€125.00n/a2
Sep ’25€106.60
€127.00
+19.1%
1.6%€129.00€125.00n/a2
Aug ’25€108.60
€127.00
+16.9%
1.6%€129.00€125.00n/a2
Jul ’25€111.60
€127.00
+13.8%
1.6%€129.00€125.00n/a2
Jun ’25n/a
€127.00
0%
1.6%€129.00€125.00n/a2
May ’25€113.20
€127.00
+12.2%
1.6%€129.00€125.00n/a2
Apr ’25€104.28
€127.00
+21.8%
1.6%€129.00€125.00n/a2
Mar ’25€101.79
€123.50
+21.3%
4.5%€129.00€118.00n/a2
Feb ’25€107.20
€123.50
+15.2%
4.5%€129.00€118.00n/a2
Jan ’25€101.60
€123.50
+21.6%
4.5%€129.00€118.00n/a2
Dec ’24€91.49
€120.00
+31.2%
1.7%€122.00€118.00n/a2
Nov ’24€84.90
€120.00
+41.3%
1.7%€122.00€118.00€107.002
Oct ’24€95.32
€120.00
+25.9%
1.7%€122.00€118.00€113.002
Sep ’24€97.19
€120.00
+23.5%
1.7%€122.00€118.00€106.602
Aug ’24€100.40
€120.00
+19.5%
1.7%€122.00€118.00€108.602

Analyst Forecast: Target price is more than 20% higher than the current share price, but there are not enough analysts covering the stock to determine statistical confidence in agreement.


Discover undervalued companies