Is Fast Ejendom Danmark (CPH:FED) Using Too Much Debt?

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Fast Ejendom Danmark A/S (CPH:FED) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

Advertisement

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

See our latest analysis for Fast Ejendom Danmark

How Much Debt Does Fast Ejendom Danmark Carry?

As you can see below, Fast Ejendom Danmark had kr.583.4m of debt at June 2022, down from kr.654.7m a year prior. On the flip side, it has kr.37.0m in cash leading to net debt of about kr.546.4m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
CPSE:FED Debt to Equity History October 18th 2022

How Healthy Is Fast Ejendom Danmark's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Fast Ejendom Danmark had liabilities of kr.49.2m due within a year, and liabilities of kr.665.6m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of kr.37.0m and kr.6.80m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by kr.671.0m.

This deficit casts a shadow over the kr.290.5m company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. After all, Fast Ejendom Danmark would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

Fast Ejendom Danmark has a rather high debt to EBITDA ratio of 15.2 which suggests a meaningful debt load. However, its interest coverage of 4.1 is reasonably strong, which is a good sign. On a lighter note, we note that Fast Ejendom Danmark grew its EBIT by 21% in the last year. If sustained, this growth should make that debt evaporate like a scarce drinking water during an unnaturally hot summer. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Fast Ejendom Danmark will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Fast Ejendom Danmark generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 82% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That puts it in a very strong position to pay down debt.

Our View

Fast Ejendom Danmark's level of total liabilities and net debt to EBITDA definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Fast Ejendom Danmark is taking some risks with its use of debt. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Fast Ejendom Danmark (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About CPSE:FED

Fast Ejendom Danmark

Fast Ejendom Denmark is a real estate investment firm specializing in commercial and residential properties.

Good value with slight risk.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
OPTH logo
Lou_Basenese on Optimi Health ·

The Only Psychedelic Company Already Selling MDMA and Psilocybin to Real Patients, Yet Priced Like It Doesn’t Exist

Fair Value:US$1158.7% undervalued
32 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
WE
WealthAP
NOVO B logo
WealthAP on Novo Nordisk ·

Novo Nordisk (NVO): Is the "Easy Growth" Story Over?

Fair Value:DKK 407.7721.6% undervalued
48 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
VA
ValueInvestingSubstack
ZTS logo
ValueInvestingSubstack on Zoetis ·

Zoetis down -50% over the past year

Fair Value:US$92.9220.2% undervalued
14 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
CE
CentryResearch
LEU logo
CentryResearch on Centrus Energy ·

Centrus Energy: The Next Nuclear Bottleneck Isn't Reactors. It's Fuel.

Fair Value:US$1908.3% undervalued
11 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

AL
NOW logo
Alice3D on ServiceNow ·

NOW is an established SAAS positioned for accelerated growth over the next 5 years.

Fair Value:US$15538.4% undervalued
23 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
EP
SVRS logo
Epstein_Research on Silver Storm Mining ·

Silver Storm Mining, oversold silver junior

Fair Value:CA$278.5% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
ST
StoxEurope
KBC logo
StoxEurope on KBC Group ·

KBC Group (ENXTBR:KBC) Valuation Deep-Dive: Why Dividend and Book Value Models Point in Opposite Directions.

Fair Value:€116.944.9% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

IN
Investingwilly
MA logo
Investingwilly on Mastercard ·

Mastercard: The Best Dividend Stock You're Ignoring

Fair Value:US$75029.1% undervalued
100 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
BE
PYPL logo
benjamin_lvieq on PayPal Holdings ·

PayPal: PayPal Doesn't Need to Grow – It Needs to Stop Falling – A Mispriced Cash Machine With a Cannibal Buyback

Fair Value:US$6514.6% undervalued
69 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
10 users have liked this narrative
BL
BlackGoat
CBRS logo
BlackGoat on Cerebras Systems ·

The Wafer Giant Threatening NVIDIA's GPU Hegemony

Fair Value:US$415.5449.5% undervalued
64 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

ST
StoxEurope
AD logo
StoxEurope on Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize ·

I ran Ahold Delhaize through a three-model triangulation — DCF, dividend discount, and residual income — with every assumption published and tagged as fact or assumption. The interesting result isn't a number, it's a disagreement: the point estimates run from €20,03 (RIM) through €27,64 (DDM) to €64,91 (DCF), and the pairwise overlaps form two disjoint segments — €20,36–€21,54 and €39,60–€44,56. Between €21,54 and €39,60, no two of the three models agree. [img]https://staticm.fastcomments.com/1784197249786-1000x1000-ad-range-strip.png[/img] Most of the spread is lens properties rather than company drama. A dividend model structurally can't see the roughly half of shareholder returns Ahold pays through buybacks. The book is ~96 % goodwill from the 2016 merger, which pins the residual-income reading low. And ~83 % of the DCF's value sits beyond the explicit five years, so it leans hard on the terminal assumptions. Three honest lenses, three honest answers — the disagreement is the information. Disclosures Position disclosure: The author holds no position in Ahold Delhaize as at 9 July 2026. This valuation is a StoxEurope opinion, based on honest research. Mistakes are possible. This is not investment advice. Do your own research. This article demonstrates a valuation methodology. It is not an investment recommendation, is not personalised to any reader's circumstances, and every figure in it depends entirely on the stated assumptions

1
|
0