Stock Analysis

China Railway Tielong Container Logistics (SHSE:600125) Could Be Struggling To Allocate Capital

SHSE:600125
Source: Shutterstock

When it comes to investing, there are some useful financial metrics that can warn us when a business is potentially in trouble. A business that's potentially in decline often shows two trends, a return on capital employed (ROCE) that's declining, and a base of capital employed that's also declining. Basically the company is earning less on its investments and it is also reducing its total assets. So after glancing at the trends within China Railway Tielong Container Logistics (SHSE:600125), we weren't too hopeful.

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for China Railway Tielong Container Logistics:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) Ă· (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.072 = CN„613m ÷ (CN„9.7b - CN„1.2b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

Thus, China Railway Tielong Container Logistics has an ROCE of 7.2%. On its own that's a low return, but compared to the average of 4.3% generated by the Transportation industry, it's much better.

Check out our latest analysis for China Railway Tielong Container Logistics

roce
SHSE:600125 Return on Capital Employed September 27th 2024

In the above chart we have measured China Railway Tielong Container Logistics' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for China Railway Tielong Container Logistics .

So How Is China Railway Tielong Container Logistics' ROCE Trending?

There is reason to be cautious about China Railway Tielong Container Logistics, given the returns are trending downwards. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 9.7% that they were earning five years ago. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect China Railway Tielong Container Logistics to turn into a multi-bagger.

On a related note, China Railway Tielong Container Logistics has decreased its current liabilities to 12% of total assets. That could partly explain why the ROCE has dropped. What's more, this can reduce some aspects of risk to the business because now the company's suppliers or short-term creditors are funding less of its operations. Since the business is basically funding more of its operations with it's own money, you could argue this has made the business less efficient at generating ROCE.

Our Take On China Railway Tielong Container Logistics' ROCE

In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. In spite of that, the stock has delivered a 4.0% return to shareholders who held over the last five years. Either way, we aren't huge fans of the current trends and so with that we think you might find better investments elsewhere.

One more thing to note, we've identified 1 warning sign with China Railway Tielong Container Logistics and understanding it should be part of your investment process.

For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

‱ Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
‱ Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
‱ High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.