Here's Why It's Unlikely That EnWave Corporation's (CVE:ENW) CEO Will See A Pay Rise This Year
Key Insights
- EnWave will host its Annual General Meeting on 27th of March
- Total pay for CEO Brent Charleton includes CA$300.0k salary
- Total compensation is 40% above industry average
- EnWave's three-year loss to shareholders was 73% while its EPS was down 2.8% over the past three years
The results at EnWave Corporation (CVE:ENW) have been quite disappointing recently and CEO Brent Charleton bears some responsibility for this. Shareholders can take the chance to hold the board and management accountable for the unsatisfactory performance at the next AGM on 27th of March. This will be also be a chance where they can challenge the board on company direction and vote on resolutions such as executive remuneration. We present the case why we think CEO compensation is out of sync with company performance.
Check out our latest analysis for EnWave
Comparing EnWave Corporation's CEO Compensation With The Industry
Our data indicates that EnWave Corporation has a market capitalization of CA$28m, and total annual CEO compensation was reported as CA$375k for the year to September 2024. That's a notable decrease of 34% on last year. In particular, the salary of CA$300.0k, makes up a huge portion of the total compensation being paid to the CEO.
In comparison with other companies in the Canadian Machinery industry with market capitalizations under CA$286m, the reported median total CEO compensation was CA$268k. Accordingly, our analysis reveals that EnWave Corporation pays Brent Charleton north of the industry median.
On an industry level, roughly 84% of total compensation represents salary and 16% is other remuneration. Our data reveals that EnWave allocates salary more or less in line with the wider market. If salary is the major component in total compensation, it suggests that the CEO receives a higher fixed proportion of the total compensation, regardless of performance.
EnWave Corporation's Growth
Over the last three years, EnWave Corporation has shrunk its earnings per share by 2.8% per year. Its revenue is down 18% over the previous year.
A lack of EPS improvement is not good to see. And the fact that revenue is down year on year arguably paints an ugly picture. So given this relatively weak performance, shareholders would probably not want to see high compensation for the CEO. Although we don't have analyst forecasts, you might want to assess this data-rich visualization of earnings, revenue and cash flow.
Has EnWave Corporation Been A Good Investment?
Few EnWave Corporation shareholders would feel satisfied with the return of -73% over three years. This suggests it would be unwise for the company to pay the CEO too generously.
In Summary...
Not only have shareholders not seen a favorable return on their investment, but the business hasn't performed well either. Few shareholders would be willing to award the CEO with a pay raise. At the upcoming AGM, management will get a chance to explain how they plan to get the business back on track and address the concerns from investors.
CEO compensation can have a massive impact on performance, but it's just one element. That's why we did some digging and identified 2 warning signs for EnWave that you should be aware of before investing.
Switching gears from EnWave, if you're hunting for a pristine balance sheet and premium returns, this free list of high return, low debt companies is a great place to look.
Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.
Discover if EnWave might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.
Access Free AnalysisHave feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
About TSXV:ENW
EnWave
Designs, constructs, markets, and sells vacuum-microwave dehydration machinery for the food, cannabis, and biomaterial industries in Canada, the United States, and internationally.
Excellent balance sheet with limited growth.
Similar Companies
Market Insights
Weekly Picks

The "Physical AI" Monopoly – A New Industrial Revolution
Czechoslovak Group - is it really so hot?

The Compound Effect: From Acquisition to Integration
Recently Updated Narratives

Very Bullish

A Tale of Two Engines: Coca-Cola HBC (EEE.AT)

This strategic transformation of TTE? Significant re-rating potential
Popular Narratives
Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth

Is Ubisoft the Market’s Biggest Pricing Error? Why Forensic Value Points to €33 Per Share

Analyst Commentary Highlights Microsoft AI Momentum and Upward Valuation Amid Growth and Competitive Risks
Trending Discussion
When was the last time that Tesla delivered on its promises? Lets go through the list! The last successful would be the Tesla Model 3 which was 2019 with first deliveries 2017. Roadster not shipped. Tesla Cybertruck global roll out failed. They might have a bunch of prototypes (that are being controlled remotely) And you think they'll be able to ship something as complicated as a robot? It's a pure speculation buy.
This article completely disregards (ignores, forgets) how far China is in this field. If Tesla continues on this path, they will be fighting for their lives trying to sell $40000 dollar robots that can do less than a $10000 dollar one from China will do. Fair value of Tesla? It has always been a hype stock with a valuation completely unbased in reality. Your guess is as good as mine, but especially after the carbon credit scheme got canned, it is downwards of $150.
