Why Broad Gate S.A.’s (WSE:BDG) Return On Capital Employed Might Be A Concern

    Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!

    Today we'll look at Broad Gate S.A. (WSE:BDG) and reflect on its potential as an investment. Specifically, we're going to calculate its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), in the hopes of getting some insight into the business.

    First up, we'll look at what ROCE is and how we calculate it. Second, we'll look at its ROCE compared to similar companies. Last but not least, we'll look at what impact its current liabilities have on its ROCE.

    Advertisement

    What is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

    ROCE measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Generally speaking a higher ROCE is better. Ultimately, it is a useful but imperfect metric. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since 'No two businesses are exactly alike.'

    So, How Do We Calculate ROCE?

    Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

    Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

    Or for Broad Gate:

    0.038 = zł1.7m ÷ (zł88m - zł42m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2019.)

    So, Broad Gate has an ROCE of 3.8%.

    View our latest analysis for Broad Gate

    Is Broad Gate's ROCE Good?

    ROCE can be useful when making comparisons, such as between similar companies. In this analysis, Broad Gate's ROCE appears meaningfully below the 12% average reported by the Food industry. This performance could be negative if sustained, as it suggests the business may underperform its industry. Putting aside Broad Gate's performance relative to its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms is poor - considering the risk of owning stocks compared to government bonds. It is likely that there are more attractive prospects out there.

    In our analysis, Broad Gate's ROCE appears to be 3.8%, compared to 3 years ago, when its ROCE was 1.5%. This makes us think the business might be improving.

    WSE:BDG Past Revenue and Net Income, June 14th 2019
    WSE:BDG Past Revenue and Net Income, June 14th 2019

    When considering this metric, keep in mind that it is backwards looking, and not necessarily predictive. Companies in cyclical industries can be difficult to understand using ROCE, as returns typically look high during boom times, and low during busts. This is because ROCE only looks at one year, instead of considering returns across a whole cycle. How cyclical is Broad Gate? You can see for yourself by looking at this free graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

    Do Broad Gate's Current Liabilities Skew Its ROCE?

    Liabilities, such as supplier bills and bank overdrafts, are referred to as current liabilities if they need to be paid within 12 months. Due to the way ROCE is calculated, a high level of current liabilities makes a company look as though it has less capital employed, and thus can (sometimes unfairly) boost the ROCE. To counter this, investors can check if a company has high current liabilities relative to total assets.

    Broad Gate has total liabilities of zł42m and total assets of zł88m. As a result, its current liabilities are equal to approximately 48% of its total assets. With a medium level of current liabilities boosting the ROCE a little, Broad Gate's low ROCE is unappealing.

    What We Can Learn From Broad Gate's ROCE

    This company may not be the most attractive investment prospect. You might be able to find a better investment than Broad Gate. If you want a selection of possible winners, check out this free list of interesting companies that trade on a P/E below 20 (but have proven they can grow earnings).

    For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

    MI
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
    98
    ZO
    zoe_vi5fn

    Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

    CO
    connor_iwn1g

    Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

    Andrew Legget

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
    At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
    10
    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    LO
    Lou_Basenese
    ONCY logo
    Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

    The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

    Fair Value:US$3.575.5% undervalued
    23 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    Recommended Voice
    META logo
    tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

    The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

    Fair Value:US$5861.4% undervalued
    59 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    34 users have liked this narrative
    TA
    Talos
    Emerging Author
    VOYG logo
    Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

    The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

    Fair Value:US$385.291.1% undervalued
    60 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    6 users have liked this narrative
    IV
    Emerging Author
    UBER logo
    Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

    Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

    Fair Value:US$11632.1% undervalued
    12 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    AC
    INTC logo
    achillez_97613 on Intel ·

    Fair Value = $110, Bull = $150, Bear = $65.

    Fair Value:US$56.0559.6% overvalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    RE
    AGFB logo
    RecMag on Agfa-Gevaert ·

    Agfa-Gevaert is a digital and materials turnaround opportunity, with growth potential in ZIRFON, but carrying legacy risks.

    Fair Value:€5.3991.4% undervalued
    28 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    LU
    LunaRodas
    FRO logo
    LunaRodas on Frontline ·

    FRO | Frontline: What They Said vs. What They Did

    Fair Value:US$34.0729.7% overvalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    OS
    oscargarcia
    NVDA logo
    oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

    The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

    Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
    365 users have followed this narrative
    9 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative
    CU
    MSFT logo
    CubanEros on Microsoft ·

    A wonderful business at reasonable price.

    Fair Value:US$419.9122.3% overvalued
    213 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    9 users have liked this narrative
    KI
    AMZN logo
    KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

    Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

    Fair Value:US$475.0943.9% undervalued
    238 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    8 users have liked this narrative