Spire (NYSE:SR) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital. So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Spire Inc. (NYSE:SR) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Advertisement

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Spire

What Is Spire's Net Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at December 2019 Spire had debt of US$3.05b, up from US$2.79b in one year. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.

NYSE:SR Historical Debt April 30th 2020
NYSE:SR Historical Debt April 30th 2020

A Look At Spire's Liabilities

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Spire had liabilities of US$1.25b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$4.12b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$21.5m and US$457.9m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$4.90b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's US$3.84b market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

Spire has a rather high debt to EBITDA ratio of 6.1 which suggests a meaningful debt load. However, its interest coverage of 2.9 is reasonably strong, which is a good sign. Fortunately, Spire grew its EBIT by 9.9% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Spire's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Spire saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

Our View

To be frank both Spire's net debt to EBITDA and its track record of converting EBIT to free cash flow make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But on the bright side, its EBIT growth rate is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. We should also note that Gas Utilities industry companies like Spire commonly do use debt without problems. Overall, it seems to us that Spire's balance sheet is really quite a risk to the business. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Spire is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those shouldn't be ignored...

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

About NYSE:SR

Spire

Engages in the purchase, retail distribution, and sale of natural gas to residential, commercial, industrial, and other end-users of natural gas in the United States.

Solid track record average dividend payer.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

DA
davidlsander
OPTH logo
davidlsander on Optimi Health ·

OPTH: A licensed manufacturer already selling MDMA while peers still wait on trials

Fair Value:US$1261.0% undervalued
15 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
2 users have liked this narrative
FU
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45037.4% undervalued
9 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2036.8% overvalued
6 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$2.4541.2% undervalued
16 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
18 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

RC
PLTR logo
rcb9 on Palantir Technologies ·

The Fifty-Five Percent Margin Is A Tax Holiday, Not The Business

Fair Value:US$91.8590.5% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
KL
TAL logo
Klim on PetroTal ·

PetroTal: Betting On a Production Recovery

Fair Value:CA$0.8542.4% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
DA
AIIO logo
david_1211213 on Robo.ai ·

Robo.ai (AIIO): A Long-Term Bullish Technical Setup

Fair Value:US$5.6447.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
296 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9120.0% overvalued
158 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0942.7% undervalued
178 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

M0
PONY logo
m00sekateer on Pony AI ·

Checked it. The arithmetic is fine; the inputs aren't, and the conclusion doesn't follow even if they were.1. Fare. $7 is a US robotaxi price. Pony's record peak day in Shenzhen (22 March 2026) was RMB394 net revenue per Gen-7 vehicle on 25 orders — about US$2.20 per order. You're roughly 3x high.2. Utilisation. 25 orders/day is Pony's all-time single-day high, not an average, and you then run it 365 days with zero downtime for charging, cleaning, maintenance, weather or geofence interruption.Corrected, the best day Pony has ever recorded yields ~US$55/day. On $43k of hardware that's ~26 months of gross revenue, before any operating cost. The reported actuals agree: FY2025 robotaxi services revenue US$16.6m on a fleet just past 1,000 units; Q1 2026 US$8.6m with the fleet above 1,700 — call it US$20–25k per vehicle per year against your $63,875.3. The caveat is the whole argument. You flag "not including operational costs (people costs)" and then set it aside. Remote safety operators, platform commissions, charging, insurance, cleaning, depot and maintenance are what determine whether a robotaxi contributes anything at all.4. Payback isn't profitability. Q1 2026: 16.2% gross margin on US$34.3m revenue, US$63.9m of opex, US$53.5m net loss. Marginal hardware payback says nothing about R&D, mapping, licensing or overhead.5. Falling BOM cuts both ways. Pony targets sub-RMB230k (~US$34k) total vehicle cost for 2027. Great for new units, bad for the residual value of fleets already deployed on a five-year depreciation schedule.What you get right: the cost trajectory is real, and city-wide UE breakeven in Guangzhou (Nov 2025) and Shenzhen (Feb 2026) is a genuine milestone. But that is contribution-margin breakeven per trip — not "cracked the per-unit cost," and not an 8-month payback. Your post predates all of it; the data has since landed, and it's less favourable on revenue per vehicle than the model assumed.

0
|
0