Does Ignite (ASX:IGN) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about. So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that Ignite Limited (ASX:IGN) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

View our latest analysis for Ignite

What Is Ignite's Net Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2019 Ignite had debt of AU$5.80m, up from AU$628.0k in one year. However, it does have AU$2.22m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about AU$3.58m.

ASX:IGN Historical Debt, December 3rd 2019
ASX:IGN Historical Debt, December 3rd 2019

How Strong Is Ignite's Balance Sheet?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Ignite had liabilities of AU$15.3m falling due within a year, and liabilities of AU$275.0k due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had AU$2.22m in cash and AU$21.1m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it can boast AU$7.69m more liquid assets than total liabilities.

This surplus liquidity suggests that Ignite's balance sheet could take a hit just as well as Homer Simpson's head can take a punch. With this in mind one could posit that its balance sheet is as strong as beautiful a rare rhino. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Ignite will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

In the last year Ignite had negative earnings before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 16%, to AU$153m. We would much prefer see growth.

Caveat Emptor

While Ignite's falling revenue is about as heartwarming as a wet blanket, arguably its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss is even less appealing. Its EBIT loss was a whopping AU$6.0m. Having said that, the balance sheet has plenty of liquid assets for now. That should give the business time to grow its cashflow. The company is risky because it will grow into the future to get to profitability and free cash flow. For riskier companies like Ignite I always like to keep an eye on the long term profit and revenue trends. Fortunately, you can click to see our interactive graph of its profit, revenue, and operating cashflow.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

About ASX:IGN

Ignite

Engages in the specialist recruitment and technology solutions in Australia and New Zealand.

Flawless balance sheet and fair value.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
OPTH logo
Lou_Basenese on Optimi Health ·

The Only Psychedelic Company Already Selling MDMA and Psilocybin to Real Patients, Yet Priced Like It Doesn’t Exist

Fair Value:US$1158.7% undervalued
32 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
WE
WealthAP
NOVO B logo
WealthAP on Novo Nordisk ·

Novo Nordisk (NVO): Is the "Easy Growth" Story Over?

Fair Value:DKK 407.7721.6% undervalued
49 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
VA
ValueInvestingSubstack
ZTS logo
ValueInvestingSubstack on Zoetis ·

Zoetis down -50% over the past year

Fair Value:US$92.9220.2% undervalued
15 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
CE
CentryResearch
LEU logo
CentryResearch on Centrus Energy ·

Centrus Energy: The Next Nuclear Bottleneck Isn't Reactors. It's Fuel.

Fair Value:US$1908.3% undervalued
11 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

RE
Reex
UNIBAP logo
Reex on Unibap Space Solutions ·

Long-term bet on Europe's strategic space autonomy (2030–2055)

Fair Value:SEK 36.0176.8% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AV
IOT logo
Averagemike on Samsara ·

Samsara's Future PE Will Soar to 337.7x and the Future is Bright

Fair Value:US$57.34k99.9% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
NOW logo
John_Eric on ServiceNow ·

The Company Nobody Brags About

Fair Value:US$266.0164.1% undervalued
31 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

IN
Investingwilly
MA logo
Investingwilly on Mastercard ·

Mastercard: The Best Dividend Stock You're Ignoring

Fair Value:US$75029.1% undervalued
103 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
BE
PYPL logo
benjamin_lvieq on PayPal Holdings ·

PayPal: PayPal Doesn't Need to Grow – It Needs to Stop Falling – A Mispriced Cash Machine With a Cannibal Buyback

Fair Value:US$6514.6% undervalued
69 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative
BL
BlackGoat
CBRS logo
BlackGoat on Cerebras Systems ·

The Wafer Giant Threatening NVIDIA's GPU Hegemony

Fair Value:US$415.5449.5% undervalued
64 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

ST
StoxEurope
AD logo
StoxEurope on Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize ·

I ran Ahold Delhaize through a three-model triangulation — DCF, dividend discount, and residual income — with every assumption published and tagged as fact or assumption. The interesting result isn't a number, it's a disagreement: the point estimates run from €20,03 (RIM) through €27,64 (DDM) to €64,91 (DCF), and the pairwise overlaps form two disjoint segments — €20,36–€21,54 and €39,60–€44,56. Between €21,54 and €39,60, no two of the three models agree. [img]https://staticm.fastcomments.com/1784197249786-1000x1000-ad-range-strip.png[/img] Most of the spread is lens properties rather than company drama. A dividend model structurally can't see the roughly half of shareholder returns Ahold pays through buybacks. The book is ~96 % goodwill from the 2016 merger, which pins the residual-income reading low. And ~83 % of the DCF's value sits beyond the explicit five years, so it leans hard on the terminal assumptions. Three honest lenses, three honest answers — the disagreement is the information. Disclosures Position disclosure: The author holds no position in Ahold Delhaize as at 9 July 2026. This valuation is a StoxEurope opinion, based on honest research. Mistakes are possible. This is not investment advice. Do your own research. This article demonstrates a valuation methodology. It is not an investment recommendation, is not personalised to any reader's circumstances, and every figure in it depends entirely on the stated assumptions

1
|
0