View Financial HealthDecision Diagnostics 배당 및 자사주 매입배당 기준 점검 0/6Decision Diagnostics 배당금을 지급한 기록이 없습니다.핵심 정보n/a배당 수익률n/a자사주 매입 수익률총 주주 수익률n/a미래 배당 수익률n/a배당 성장률n/a다음 배당 지급일n/a배당락일n/a주당 배당금n/a배당 성향n/a최근 배당 및 자사주 매입 업데이트업데이트 없음모든 업데이트 보기Recent updates공시 • Feb 19Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Decision Diagnostics Corporation of Class Action Lawsuit and Upcoming DeadlinePomerantz LLP announced that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Decision Diagnostics Corporation and certain of its officers. The class action, filed in United States District Court for the Central District of California, and docketed under 21-cv-00418, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired Decision Diagnostics securities between March 3, 2020 and December 17, 2020, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants' violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, against the company and certain of its top officials. Decision Diagnostics purportedly offers, among other products and services, prescription and non-prescription diagnostics and home testing products. From March 2020 to at least June 2020, Defendants claimed that the company had developed a finger-prick blood test that could detect COVID-19 in less than one minute. Defendants also made various representations regarding the company's progress towards achieving U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") emergency use authorization ("EUA") for this purported COVID-19 finger-prick blood test. The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company's business, operational, and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose to investors that: (i) Decision Diagnostics had not developed any viable COVID-19 test, much less a test that could detect COVID-19 in less than one minute; (ii) the company could not meet the FDA's EUA testing requirements for its purported COVID-19 test; (iii) accordingly, Defendants had misrepresented the timeline within which it could realistically bring its COVID-19 test to market; (iv) all the foregoing subjected Defendants to an increased risk of regulatory oversight and enforcement; and (v) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On December 17, 2020, the SEC filed a complaint in federal court against Defendants, alleging that they had issued a series of press releases that falsely claimed that Decision Diagnostics had developed a finger-prick blood test that could detect COVID-19 in less than one minute. According to the SEC Complaint, from March 2020 to at least June 2020, Defendants made false and misleading statements about the existence of Decision Diagnostics' COVID-19 device and progress towards achieving FDA EUA for that device. As alleged, at the time of these claims, Decision Diagnostics lacked a proven method for detecting the virus and had no physical testing device. The SEC Complaint further alleged that the statements created the misleading impression that Decision Diagnostics would soon introduce the COVID-19 test to the market, which led to surges in the price and trading volume of the company's stock.공시 • Feb 18The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filing of Class Action Lawsuit Against Decision DiagnosticsThe Schall Law Firm announced the filing of a class action lawsuit against Decision Diagnostics Corp. for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Decision Diagnostics failed to develop a viable COVID-19 test in any form, let alone a test that could detect the virus in less than one minute. The Company was not capable of meeting the FDA's EUA testing requirements for its purported COVID-19 test. Despite this inability to meet FDA requirements, the Company touted an unrealistic time to market for its tests. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Decision Diagnostics, investors suffered damages.공시 • Jan 19The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit against Decision Diagnostics Corp. and Encourages Investors with Losses in Excess of $500,000 to Contact the FirmThe Schall Law Firm announced the filing of a class action lawsuit against Decision Diagnostics Corp. for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors who purchased the Company's securities between March 3, 2020 and December 17, 2020, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), are encouraged to contact the firm before March 16, 2021. The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, they are not represented by an attorney. According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Decision Diagnostics failed to develop a viable COVID-19 test in any form, let alone a test that could detect the virus in less than one minute. The Company was not capable of meeting the FDA's EUA testing requirements for its purported COVID-19 test. Despite this inability to meet FDA requirements, the Company touted an unrealistic time to market for its tests. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Decision Diagnostics, investors suffered damages.지급의 안정성과 성장배당 데이터 가져오는 중안정적인 배당: 과거에 DECN 의 주당 배당금이 안정적이었는지 판단하기에는 데이터가 부족합니다.배당금 증가: DECN 의 배당금 지급이 증가했는지 판단하기에는 데이터가 부족합니다.배당 수익률 vs 시장Decision Diagnostics 배당 수익률 vs 시장DECN의 배당 수익률은 시장과 어떻게 비교되나요?구분배당 수익률회사 (DECN)n/a시장 하위 25% (US)1.4%시장 상위 25% (US)4.3%업계 평균 (Healthcare Services)1.3%분석가 예측 (DECN) (최대 3년)n/a주목할만한 배당금: 회사가 최근 지급을 보고하지 않았기 때문에 하위 25%의 배당금 지급자에 대해 DECN 의 배당 수익률을 평가할 수 없습니다.고배당: 회사가 최근 지급을 보고하지 않았기 때문에 배당금 지급자의 상위 25%에 대해 DECN 의 배당 수익률을 평가할 수 없습니다.주주 대상 이익 배당수익 보장: 배당금 지급이 수익으로 충당되는지 확인하기 위해 DECN 의 지급 비율을 계산하기에는 데이터가 부족합니다.주주 현금 배당현금 흐름 범위: DECN 에서 지급을 보고하지 않았기 때문에 배당 지속 가능성을 계산할 수 없습니다.높은 배당을 제공하는 우량 기업 찾기7D1Y7D1Y7D1YUS 시장에서 배당이 강한 기업.View Management기업 분석 및 재무 데이터 상태데이터최종 업데이트 (UTC 시간)기업 분석2026/05/21 15:32종가2026/05/19 00:00수익2021/09/30연간 수익2020/12/31데이터 소스당사의 기업 분석에 사용되는 데이터는 S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC에서 제공됩니다. 아래 데이터는 이 보고서를 생성하기 위해 분석 모델에서 사용됩니다. 데이터는 정규화되므로 소스가 제공된 후 지연이 발생할 수 있습니다.패키지데이터기간미국 소스 예시 *기업 재무제표10년손익계산서현금흐름표대차대조표SEC 양식 10-KSEC 양식 10-Q분석가 컨센서스 추정치+3년재무 예측분석가 목표주가분석가 리서치 보고서Blue Matrix시장 가격30년주가배당, 분할 및 기타 조치ICE 시장 데이터SEC 양식 S-1지분 구조10년주요 주주내부자 거래SEC 양식 4SEC 양식 13D경영진10년리더십 팀이사회SEC 양식 10-KSEC 양식 DEF 14A주요 개발10년회사 공시SEC 양식 8-K* 미국 증권에 대한 예시이며, 비(非)미국 증권에는 해당 국가의 규제 서식 및 자료원을 사용합니다.별도로 명시되지 않는 한 모든 재무 데이터는 연간 기간을 기준으로 하지만 분기별로 업데이트됩니다. 이를 TTM(최근 12개월) 또는 LTM(지난 12개월) 데이터라고 합니다. 자세히 알아보기.분석 모델 및 스노우플레이크이 보고서를 생성하는 데 사용된 분석 모델에 대한 자세한 내용은 당사의 Github 페이지에서 확인하실 수 있습니다. 또한 보고서 활용 방법에 대한 가이드와 YouTube 튜토리얼도 제공합니다.Simply Wall St 분석 모델을 설계하고 구축한 세계적 수준의 팀에 대해 알아보세요.산업 및 섹터 지표산업 및 섹터 지표는 Simply Wall St가 6시간마다 계산하며, 프로세스에 대한 자세한 내용은 Github에서 확인할 수 있습니다.분석가 소스Decision Diagnostics Corp.는 0명의 분석가가 다루고 있습니다. 이 중 0명의 분석가가 우리 보고서에 입력 데이터로 사용되는 매출 또는 수익 추정치를 제출했습니다. 분석가의 제출 자료는 하루 종일 업데이트됩니다.
공시 • Feb 19Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Decision Diagnostics Corporation of Class Action Lawsuit and Upcoming DeadlinePomerantz LLP announced that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Decision Diagnostics Corporation and certain of its officers. The class action, filed in United States District Court for the Central District of California, and docketed under 21-cv-00418, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired Decision Diagnostics securities between March 3, 2020 and December 17, 2020, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants' violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, against the company and certain of its top officials. Decision Diagnostics purportedly offers, among other products and services, prescription and non-prescription diagnostics and home testing products. From March 2020 to at least June 2020, Defendants claimed that the company had developed a finger-prick blood test that could detect COVID-19 in less than one minute. Defendants also made various representations regarding the company's progress towards achieving U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") emergency use authorization ("EUA") for this purported COVID-19 finger-prick blood test. The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company's business, operational, and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose to investors that: (i) Decision Diagnostics had not developed any viable COVID-19 test, much less a test that could detect COVID-19 in less than one minute; (ii) the company could not meet the FDA's EUA testing requirements for its purported COVID-19 test; (iii) accordingly, Defendants had misrepresented the timeline within which it could realistically bring its COVID-19 test to market; (iv) all the foregoing subjected Defendants to an increased risk of regulatory oversight and enforcement; and (v) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On December 17, 2020, the SEC filed a complaint in federal court against Defendants, alleging that they had issued a series of press releases that falsely claimed that Decision Diagnostics had developed a finger-prick blood test that could detect COVID-19 in less than one minute. According to the SEC Complaint, from March 2020 to at least June 2020, Defendants made false and misleading statements about the existence of Decision Diagnostics' COVID-19 device and progress towards achieving FDA EUA for that device. As alleged, at the time of these claims, Decision Diagnostics lacked a proven method for detecting the virus and had no physical testing device. The SEC Complaint further alleged that the statements created the misleading impression that Decision Diagnostics would soon introduce the COVID-19 test to the market, which led to surges in the price and trading volume of the company's stock.
공시 • Feb 18The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filing of Class Action Lawsuit Against Decision DiagnosticsThe Schall Law Firm announced the filing of a class action lawsuit against Decision Diagnostics Corp. for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Decision Diagnostics failed to develop a viable COVID-19 test in any form, let alone a test that could detect the virus in less than one minute. The Company was not capable of meeting the FDA's EUA testing requirements for its purported COVID-19 test. Despite this inability to meet FDA requirements, the Company touted an unrealistic time to market for its tests. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Decision Diagnostics, investors suffered damages.
공시 • Jan 19The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit against Decision Diagnostics Corp. and Encourages Investors with Losses in Excess of $500,000 to Contact the FirmThe Schall Law Firm announced the filing of a class action lawsuit against Decision Diagnostics Corp. for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors who purchased the Company's securities between March 3, 2020 and December 17, 2020, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), are encouraged to contact the firm before March 16, 2021. The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, they are not represented by an attorney. According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Decision Diagnostics failed to develop a viable COVID-19 test in any form, let alone a test that could detect the virus in less than one minute. The Company was not capable of meeting the FDA's EUA testing requirements for its purported COVID-19 test. Despite this inability to meet FDA requirements, the Company touted an unrealistic time to market for its tests. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Decision Diagnostics, investors suffered damages.