Loading...
FST logo

FAST Acquisition Corp.NYSE:FST 주식 보고서

시가총액 US$254.5m
주가
n/a
1Y-17.9%
7D-1.2%
1D0.3%
포트폴리오 가치
​
보기

FAST Acquisition Corp.

NYSE:FST 주식 리포트

시가총액: US$254.5m

This company listing is no longer active

This company may still be operating, however this listing is no longer active. Find out why through their latest events.

FAST Acquisition (FST) 주식 개요

FAST Acquisition Corp. does not have significant operations. 자세히 보기

FST 펀더멘털 분석
스노우플레이크 점수
가치 평가2/6
미래 성장0/6
과거 실적3/6
재무 건전성0/6
배당0/6

강점

주가수익률(6.3x)이 US 시장(19.2x)보다 낮습니다.

올해부터 흑자전환

위험 분석

수익이 USD$1m 미만입니다($0)

마이너스 주주 지분

부채는 operating cash flow로 충분히 감당되지 않습니다.


FST Community Fair Values

Create Narrative

See what others think this stock is worth. Follow their fair value or set your own to get alerts.

NEW493,048 members

Join community and earn perks

Gain real feedbackFrom our editorial team, personally. Not silence.
Grow your followingReal investors. The kind who actually invest, not scroll past.
Unlock free accessFree premium subscription for consistent and quality authors.
Learn moreCreate Narrative
BL
BlackGoat
IN
Investingwilly
RO
RockeTeller
AG
Agricola
493,048 investors already sharing narratives
View all narratives

FAST Acquisition Corp. 경쟁사

가격 이력 및 성과

FAST Acquisition 주가의 최고가, 최저가 및 변동 요약
과거 주가
현재 주가US$10.18
52주 최고가US$13.17
52주 최저가US$10.01
베타0
1개월 변동-0.78%
3개월 변동0.99%
1년 변동-17.90%
3년 변동n/a
5년 변동n/a
IPO 이후 변동4.95%

최근 뉴스 및 업데이트

Seeking Alpha • Aug 23

Where Might Value Be Hidden?

What’s working? What rhymes? A few successes that point the way. Hiding places Before I research a company’s fundamental valuation or event path, I first focus on the potential for mispricing. There are a lot of companies out there, and I like to search good hiding places. Here’s where I’ve been looking in recent months, what I’ve been finding, and what might come next. Companies that botched their sale process What worked… Zendesk (ZEN) has a comically inept board and management that managed to completely flub their sales process. Only after they gave up did a buyer swoop back in with a mercy killing. The broken process ultimately created a great opportunity for investors’ new capital. The deal should close on its original terms by December. What’s next… Kohl’s (KSS) board and management might possibly be even worse. They are bad at running their business and bad at selling their business. They also messed up the sale process resulting in no deal and a collapsed stock price. But this could be an opportunity. They wildly exaggerated their earnings expectations in order to stave off a proxy challenge. Shareholders won’t fall for their “exaggerations” (shorter and possibly more accurate word also available) again. So they have less than a year no matter what. And they have zero remaining credibility. With stabilizing equity and credit markets, they might want to circle back to bidders. The last one standing was Franchise Group (FRG) with a bid of over $50 per share. Overly audacious asks from sellers What worked… Nielsen (NLSN) had a wide deal spread because of a wildly bullish shareholder, Windacre, whose view of the company was and is that it's worth far more than any potential bidder was willing to pay (which in turn was far higher than where it would trade as a standalone company). They have a blocking stake which imperiled a sale. However, they were able to reach an accommodation wherein this one holder will get options that will pay off if their bullishness proves to be correct. What’s next… Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ) had a bid from Rio Tinto (RIO) for the shares that Rio doesn’t already own, but the target’s special committee turned them down cold. This will be a very hard position to maintain, especially since they will have to face up to a dilutive capital raise if they stay a standalone company. Yes, they want more as do some prominent holders. But their want is far above the (only) bidder’s bid which in turn is far above the standalone price that the market assigns TRQ shares. That leaves today’s shares beneath the private market bid and ask, which should be a solvable problem, even with audacious asks from sellers. Perhaps they take a page from NLSN and take the best available deal, even if they want more. Post-close litigation kickers What worked… Apollo (APO) successfully completed their LBO of The Fresh Market (formerly TFM) for $28.50 per share in cash in April 2016. Former TFM shareholders just received an additional $0.55 per share settlement from post-deal litigation.
Seeking Alpha • Dec 09

Fast Acquisition: Too Much Uncertainty

Redemption deadline and shareholder meeting delayed. Deal still in doubt, likely litigation or reworked deal. Selling shares on uncertainty. Closing put trades. Chantham Asset Management is loading up on warrants. Uncertainty and likely dilution if a deal gets done makes shares a sell.
Seeking Alpha • Dec 02

FAST Acquisition Suddenly A Low Risk, Big Upside Speculation

Wow, what a world day makes, apparently Tilman Fertitta thinks the FAST deal is so good he wants it all to himself or there's something else going on. Apparently, the drift down in stock price was more than the market, "somebody always knows." Fertitta Entertainment tried to initiate a termination of the merger of the companies involved. FAST Acquisition responded that the merger could not be terminated. This suddenly becomes a very low risk, high return speculation with $10 beneath the shares in trust.

Recent updates

Seeking Alpha • Aug 23

Where Might Value Be Hidden?

What’s working? What rhymes? A few successes that point the way. Hiding places Before I research a company’s fundamental valuation or event path, I first focus on the potential for mispricing. There are a lot of companies out there, and I like to search good hiding places. Here’s where I’ve been looking in recent months, what I’ve been finding, and what might come next. Companies that botched their sale process What worked… Zendesk (ZEN) has a comically inept board and management that managed to completely flub their sales process. Only after they gave up did a buyer swoop back in with a mercy killing. The broken process ultimately created a great opportunity for investors’ new capital. The deal should close on its original terms by December. What’s next… Kohl’s (KSS) board and management might possibly be even worse. They are bad at running their business and bad at selling their business. They also messed up the sale process resulting in no deal and a collapsed stock price. But this could be an opportunity. They wildly exaggerated their earnings expectations in order to stave off a proxy challenge. Shareholders won’t fall for their “exaggerations” (shorter and possibly more accurate word also available) again. So they have less than a year no matter what. And they have zero remaining credibility. With stabilizing equity and credit markets, they might want to circle back to bidders. The last one standing was Franchise Group (FRG) with a bid of over $50 per share. Overly audacious asks from sellers What worked… Nielsen (NLSN) had a wide deal spread because of a wildly bullish shareholder, Windacre, whose view of the company was and is that it's worth far more than any potential bidder was willing to pay (which in turn was far higher than where it would trade as a standalone company). They have a blocking stake which imperiled a sale. However, they were able to reach an accommodation wherein this one holder will get options that will pay off if their bullishness proves to be correct. What’s next… Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ) had a bid from Rio Tinto (RIO) for the shares that Rio doesn’t already own, but the target’s special committee turned them down cold. This will be a very hard position to maintain, especially since they will have to face up to a dilutive capital raise if they stay a standalone company. Yes, they want more as do some prominent holders. But their want is far above the (only) bidder’s bid which in turn is far above the standalone price that the market assigns TRQ shares. That leaves today’s shares beneath the private market bid and ask, which should be a solvable problem, even with audacious asks from sellers. Perhaps they take a page from NLSN and take the best available deal, even if they want more. Post-close litigation kickers What worked… Apollo (APO) successfully completed their LBO of The Fresh Market (formerly TFM) for $28.50 per share in cash in April 2016. Former TFM shareholders just received an additional $0.55 per share settlement from post-deal litigation.
Seeking Alpha • Dec 09

Fast Acquisition: Too Much Uncertainty

Redemption deadline and shareholder meeting delayed. Deal still in doubt, likely litigation or reworked deal. Selling shares on uncertainty. Closing put trades. Chantham Asset Management is loading up on warrants. Uncertainty and likely dilution if a deal gets done makes shares a sell.
Seeking Alpha • Dec 02

FAST Acquisition Suddenly A Low Risk, Big Upside Speculation

Wow, what a world day makes, apparently Tilman Fertitta thinks the FAST deal is so good he wants it all to himself or there's something else going on. Apparently, the drift down in stock price was more than the market, "somebody always knows." Fertitta Entertainment tried to initiate a termination of the merger of the companies involved. FAST Acquisition responded that the merger could not be terminated. This suddenly becomes a very low risk, high return speculation with $10 beneath the shares in trust.

주주 수익률

FSTUS Capital MarketsUS 시장
7D-1.2%-0.002%-1.4%
1Y-17.9%1.6%17.1%

수익률 대 산업: FST은 지난 1년 동안 1.6%의 수익을 기록한 US Capital Markets 산업보다 더 좋은 성과를 냈습니다.

수익률 대 시장: FST은 지난 1년 동안 17.1%를 기록한 US 시장보다 저조한 성과를 냈습니다.

주가 변동성

Is FST's price volatile compared to industry and market?
FST volatility
FST Average Weekly Movement0.9%
Capital Markets Industry Average Movement3.8%
Market Average Movement7.2%
10% most volatile stocks in US Market16.4%
10% least volatile stocks in US Market3.2%

안정적인 주가: FST는 지난 3개월 동안 US 시장에 비해 주가 변동성이 크지 않았습니다.

시간에 따른 변동성: FST의 주간 변동성(1%)은 지난 1년 동안 안정적이었습니다.

회사 소개

설립직원 수CEO웹사이트
2020n/aSandy Beallwww.fastacq.com

FAST Acquisition Corp. 기초 지표 요약

FAST Acquisition의 순이익과 매출은 시가총액과 어떻게 비교됩니까?
FST 기초 통계
시가총액US$254.50m
순이익 (TTM)US$40.35m
매출 (TTM)n/a
6.3x
주가수익비율(P/E)
0.0x
주가매출비율(P/S)

FST는 고평가되어 있습니까?

공정 가치 및 평가 분석 보기

순이익 및 매출

최근 실적 보고서(TTM)의 주요 수익성 지표
FST 손익계산서 (TTM)
매출US$0
매출원가US$0
총이익US$0
기타 비용-US$40.35m
순이익US$40.35m

최근 보고된 실적

Jun 30, 2022

다음 실적 발표일

해당 없음

주당순이익(EPS)1.61
총이익률0.00%
순이익률0.00%
부채/자본 비율-7.4%

FST의 장기 실적은 어땠습니까?

과거 실적 및 비교 보기

기업 분석 및 재무 데이터 상태

데이터최종 업데이트 (UTC 시간)
기업 분석2022/08/27 11:22
종가2022/08/25 00:00
수익2022/06/30
연간 수익2021/12/31

데이터 소스

당사의 기업 분석에 사용되는 데이터는 S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC에서 제공됩니다. 아래 데이터는 이 보고서를 생성하기 위해 분석 모델에서 사용됩니다. 데이터는 정규화되므로 소스가 제공된 후 지연이 발생할 수 있습니다.

패키지데이터기간미국 소스 예시 *
기업 재무제표10년
  • 손익계산서
  • 현금흐름표
  • 대차대조표
분석가 컨센서스 추정치+3년
  • 재무 예측
  • 분석가 목표주가
시장 가격30년
  • 주가
  • 배당, 분할 및 기타 조치
지분 구조10년
  • 주요 주주
  • 내부자 거래
경영진10년
  • 리더십 팀
  • 이사회
주요 개발10년
  • 회사 공시

* 미국 증권에 대한 예시이며, 비(非)미국 증권에는 해당 국가의 규제 서식 및 자료원을 사용합니다.

별도로 명시되지 않는 한 모든 재무 데이터는 연간 기간을 기준으로 하지만 분기별로 업데이트됩니다. 이를 TTM(최근 12개월) 또는 LTM(지난 12개월) 데이터라고 합니다. 자세히 알아보기.

분석 모델 및 스노우플레이크

이 보고서를 생성하는 데 사용된 분석 모델의 세부 정보는 당사의 GitHub 페이지에서 확인하실 수 있습니다. 또한 보고서 사용 방법에 대한 가이드와 YouTube 튜토리얼도 제공하고 있습니다.

Simply Wall St 분석 모델을 설계하고 구축한 세계적 수준의 팀에 대해 알아보세요.

산업 및 섹터 지표

산업 및 섹터 지표는 Simply Wall St가 6시간마다 계산하며, 프로세스에 대한 자세한 내용은 Github에서 확인할 수 있습니다.

분석가 소스

FAST Acquisition Corp.는 0명의 분석가가 다루고 있습니다. 이 중 명의 분석가가 우리 보고서에 입력 데이터로 사용되는 매출 또는 수익 추정치를 제출했습니다. 분석가의 제출 자료는 하루 종일 업데이트됩니다.