View Financial HealthJLM Couture 배당 및 자사주 매입배당 기준 점검 0/6JLM Couture 배당금을 지급한 기록이 없습니다.핵심 정보n/a배당 수익률n/a자사주 매입 수익률총 주주 수익률n/a미래 배당 수익률n/a배당 성장률n/a다음 배당 지급일n/a배당락일n/a주당 배당금n/a배당 성향n/a최근 배당 및 자사주 매입 업데이트업데이트 없음모든 업데이트 보기Recent updates공시 • Apr 19Joinder to Motion for Case Conversion Filed for JLM Couture, Inc.JLJ Bricken LLC joins with Hayley Paige Gutman to file a motion in the US Bankruptcy Court seeking the conversion of JLM Couture, Inc.’s bankruptcy case from Chapter 11 reorganization to Chapter 7 liquidation on April 17, 2024. The reason being the decline of relationships with important retailers and the debtor’s inability to stabilize its cash flows and provide some recovery to creditors making it difficult to consummate a plan of reorganization.공시 • Jul 28Court Finds in Favor of JLM Couture - Instagram and Pinterest Accounts Are Business Accounts - Denies Hayley Gutman's Motion in its EntiretyA Manhattan Federal Court held that New York bridal house, JLM Couture, Inc., has established a clear likelihood of success in their lawsuit against former designer, Hayley Gutman, including that the @misshayleypaige Instagram and Pinterest accounts are business accounts for the Hayley Paige brand and thus owned by JLM. The Court held that these accounts, which were created using the Hayley Paige brand name, are the product of JLM's marketing efforts and investments which built the popularity and success of the Hayley Paige brand. Judge Laura Taylor Swain, in 67 pages of decisive rulings found that Ms. Gutman, used JLM's money, resources, and strategies to help the company build the Accounts' image around and for the JLM-owned Hayley Paige brand, and thus, cannot now claim company property as Hayley own. Even more compelling, Judge Swain ruled that the Preliminary Injunction should be modified and bar Ms. Gutman from being identified as a designer of competitive products or using or authorizing others to use Ms. Gutman's role as a designer to promote the sale of any competitive goods, no matter what title she may claim in connection with a new venture or new employment, until August 1, 2027. The ruling does not prevent Ms. Gutman from designing wedding dresses. While Ms. Gutman can work for other brands, neither she nor those brands nor other third parties may identify her as the designer of those wedding dresses, and her role as a designer cannot be used to promote the sales of competitive goods. Separately, and most telling, the Court denied Ms. Gutman's motion, in its entirety, to dissolve the Preliminary Injunction.공시 • Mar 06JLM Couture, Inc. Announces Second Circuit Court of Appeals Denies Hayley Paige Gutman's PetitionThe Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in JLM Couture Inc. vs. Hayley Paige Gutman, denied appellant Ms. Gutman's petition to rehear her argument and her petition for a hearing en banc. The Appeals Court Order supports its earlier decision, as well as multiple federal District Court findings, that Ms. Gutman is not entitled to use the Designer Name in trade or commerce and that she breached her clear and unambiguous employment contract and is not entitled to any additional compensation.공시 • Jan 26JLM Couture, Inc. Announces Appeals Court Upholds JLM Couture in Contract Dispute with Hayley Paige GutmanJLM Couture, Inc. announced the Second Circuit Court of Appeals strongly affirmed that Hayley Paige Gutman breached her clear and unambiguous employment contract and is not entitled to any additional compensation. The court stated that JLM had no duty to pay Gutman if she did not work. It was Ms. Gutman who resigned and who breached her employment contract, not JLM, the Appeals Court ruled. The Appeals Court also affirmed that JLM was completely within its rights to enforce a noncompete clause in the employment contract. The Court stated that, Gutman provides no reason to question the district court's determination that this Noncompete Agreement was reasonable and fully enforceable in light of her unique role at JLM. They also stated that the District Court was correct in upholding JLM's rights to the brand name and marks in trade and commerce, and decline(d) Gutman's invitation to depart from the plain language of the Contract. In addition, the Court in no way ordered the Instagram account to change hands nor did they determine ownership of the account. They expressly declined to do so. They remanded this issue back down to the District Court as that is the proper procedure.지급의 안정성과 성장배당 데이터 가져오는 중안정적인 배당: 과거에 JLMC 의 주당 배당금이 안정적이었는지 판단하기에는 데이터가 부족합니다.배당금 증가: JLMC 의 배당금 지급이 증가했는지 판단하기에는 데이터가 부족합니다.배당 수익률 vs 시장JLM Couture 배당 수익률 vs 시장JLMC의 배당 수익률은 시장과 어떻게 비교되나요?구분배당 수익률회사 (JLMC)n/a시장 하위 25% (US)1.4%시장 상위 25% (US)4.2%업계 평균 (Luxury)2.5%분석가 예측 (JLMC) (최대 3년)n/a주목할만한 배당금: 회사가 최근 지급을 보고하지 않았기 때문에 하위 25%의 배당금 지급자에 대해 JLMC 의 배당 수익률을 평가할 수 없습니다.고배당: 회사가 최근 지급을 보고하지 않았기 때문에 배당금 지급자의 상위 25%에 대해 JLMC 의 배당 수익률을 평가할 수 없습니다.주주 대상 이익 배당수익 보장: 배당금 지급이 수익으로 충당되는지 확인하기 위해 JLMC 의 지급 비율을 계산하기에는 데이터가 부족합니다.주주 현금 배당현금 흐름 범위: JLMC 에서 지급을 보고하지 않았기 때문에 배당 지속 가능성을 계산할 수 없습니다.높은 배당을 제공하는 우량 기업 찾기7D1Y7D1Y7D1YUS 시장에서 배당이 강한 기업.View Management기업 분석 및 재무 데이터 상태데이터최종 업데이트 (UTC 시간)기업 분석2026/05/24 12:57종가2026/03/26 00:00수익2021/10/31연간 수익2021/10/31데이터 소스당사의 기업 분석에 사용되는 데이터는 S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC에서 제공됩니다. 아래 데이터는 이 보고서를 생성하기 위해 분석 모델에서 사용됩니다. 데이터는 정규화되므로 소스가 제공된 후 지연이 발생할 수 있습니다.패키지데이터기간미국 소스 예시 *기업 재무제표10년손익계산서현금흐름표대차대조표SEC 양식 10-KSEC 양식 10-Q분석가 컨센서스 추정치+3년재무 예측분석가 목표주가분석가 리서치 보고서Blue Matrix시장 가격30년주가배당, 분할 및 기타 조치ICE 시장 데이터SEC 양식 S-1지분 구조10년주요 주주내부자 거래SEC 양식 4SEC 양식 13D경영진10년리더십 팀이사회SEC 양식 10-KSEC 양식 DEF 14A주요 개발10년회사 공시SEC 양식 8-K* 미국 증권에 대한 예시이며, 비(非)미국 증권에는 해당 국가의 규제 서식 및 자료원을 사용합니다.별도로 명시되지 않는 한 모든 재무 데이터는 연간 기간을 기준으로 하지만 분기별로 업데이트됩니다. 이를 TTM(최근 12개월) 또는 LTM(지난 12개월) 데이터라고 합니다. 자세히 알아보기.분석 모델 및 스노우플레이크이 보고서를 생성하는 데 사용된 분석 모델에 대한 자세한 내용은 당사의 Github 페이지에서 확인하실 수 있습니다. 또한 보고서 활용 방법에 대한 가이드와 YouTube 튜토리얼도 제공합니다.Simply Wall St 분석 모델을 설계하고 구축한 세계적 수준의 팀에 대해 알아보세요.산업 및 섹터 지표산업 및 섹터 지표는 Simply Wall St가 6시간마다 계산하며, 프로세스에 대한 자세한 내용은 Github에서 확인할 수 있습니다.분석가 소스JLM Couture, Inc.는 0명의 분석가가 다루고 있습니다. 이 중 0명의 분석가가 우리 보고서에 입력 데이터로 사용되는 매출 또는 수익 추정치를 제출했습니다. 분석가의 제출 자료는 하루 종일 업데이트됩니다.
공시 • Apr 19Joinder to Motion for Case Conversion Filed for JLM Couture, Inc.JLJ Bricken LLC joins with Hayley Paige Gutman to file a motion in the US Bankruptcy Court seeking the conversion of JLM Couture, Inc.’s bankruptcy case from Chapter 11 reorganization to Chapter 7 liquidation on April 17, 2024. The reason being the decline of relationships with important retailers and the debtor’s inability to stabilize its cash flows and provide some recovery to creditors making it difficult to consummate a plan of reorganization.
공시 • Jul 28Court Finds in Favor of JLM Couture - Instagram and Pinterest Accounts Are Business Accounts - Denies Hayley Gutman's Motion in its EntiretyA Manhattan Federal Court held that New York bridal house, JLM Couture, Inc., has established a clear likelihood of success in their lawsuit against former designer, Hayley Gutman, including that the @misshayleypaige Instagram and Pinterest accounts are business accounts for the Hayley Paige brand and thus owned by JLM. The Court held that these accounts, which were created using the Hayley Paige brand name, are the product of JLM's marketing efforts and investments which built the popularity and success of the Hayley Paige brand. Judge Laura Taylor Swain, in 67 pages of decisive rulings found that Ms. Gutman, used JLM's money, resources, and strategies to help the company build the Accounts' image around and for the JLM-owned Hayley Paige brand, and thus, cannot now claim company property as Hayley own. Even more compelling, Judge Swain ruled that the Preliminary Injunction should be modified and bar Ms. Gutman from being identified as a designer of competitive products or using or authorizing others to use Ms. Gutman's role as a designer to promote the sale of any competitive goods, no matter what title she may claim in connection with a new venture or new employment, until August 1, 2027. The ruling does not prevent Ms. Gutman from designing wedding dresses. While Ms. Gutman can work for other brands, neither she nor those brands nor other third parties may identify her as the designer of those wedding dresses, and her role as a designer cannot be used to promote the sales of competitive goods. Separately, and most telling, the Court denied Ms. Gutman's motion, in its entirety, to dissolve the Preliminary Injunction.
공시 • Mar 06JLM Couture, Inc. Announces Second Circuit Court of Appeals Denies Hayley Paige Gutman's PetitionThe Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in JLM Couture Inc. vs. Hayley Paige Gutman, denied appellant Ms. Gutman's petition to rehear her argument and her petition for a hearing en banc. The Appeals Court Order supports its earlier decision, as well as multiple federal District Court findings, that Ms. Gutman is not entitled to use the Designer Name in trade or commerce and that she breached her clear and unambiguous employment contract and is not entitled to any additional compensation.
공시 • Jan 26JLM Couture, Inc. Announces Appeals Court Upholds JLM Couture in Contract Dispute with Hayley Paige GutmanJLM Couture, Inc. announced the Second Circuit Court of Appeals strongly affirmed that Hayley Paige Gutman breached her clear and unambiguous employment contract and is not entitled to any additional compensation. The court stated that JLM had no duty to pay Gutman if she did not work. It was Ms. Gutman who resigned and who breached her employment contract, not JLM, the Appeals Court ruled. The Appeals Court also affirmed that JLM was completely within its rights to enforce a noncompete clause in the employment contract. The Court stated that, Gutman provides no reason to question the district court's determination that this Noncompete Agreement was reasonable and fully enforceable in light of her unique role at JLM. They also stated that the District Court was correct in upholding JLM's rights to the brand name and marks in trade and commerce, and decline(d) Gutman's invitation to depart from the plain language of the Contract. In addition, the Court in no way ordered the Instagram account to change hands nor did they determine ownership of the account. They expressly declined to do so. They remanded this issue back down to the District Court as that is the proper procedure.