This company has been acquired
Startek (SRT) 주식 개요
StarTek, Inc., a business process outsourcing company, provides customer experience, digital transformation, and technology services in various markets. 자세히 보기
SRT Community Fair Values
Create NarrativeSee what others think this stock is worth. Follow their fair value or set your own to get alerts.
Startek, Inc. 경쟁사
가격 이력 및 성과
| 과거 주가 | |
|---|---|
| 현재 주가 | US$4.42 |
| 52주 최고가 | US$4.53 |
| 52주 최저가 | US$2.64 |
| 베타 | 1.32 |
| 1개월 변동 | 2.31% |
| 3개월 변동 | 36.00% |
| 1년 변동 | 11.62% |
| 3년 변동 | -43.91% |
| 5년 변동 | -41.77% |
| IPO 이후 변동 | -34.90% |
최근 뉴스 및 업데이트
Recent updates
Startek, Inc.: Unsophisticated Strategies
Summary Startek is an unattractive investment based on my view of its weak fundamental picture and uncompelling valuation. I posit the company's diversification strategy may not be effective due to low net margins and a lack of core operational efficiencies. The company's financial health is one of my concerns, with a significant portion of revenue generated by a limited number of clients. Due to the all-round lack of financial and operational strategy promise, my rating is Strong Sell. Read the full article on Seeking AlphaStartek shares soars 11% after agrees to divest interest in Contact Center Company
Startek (NYSE:SRT) stock soars 11.4% premarket after the firm notifies that ESM Holdings Limited, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the company, has entered into a definitive share purchase pact with Arabian Internet and Communications Services Company (Solutions) to divest its stake in Contact Center Company to Solutions. Startek owns 51% ownership interest in CCC with the remaining 49% ownership interest held by STC. Per the terms, Startek and STC will divest their respective ownership interest in CCC at an enterprise value of SAR450 million, subject to debt-like and working capital adjustments. The Startek stake values at $61.2 million subject to closing adjustments and capital gains taxes. It is anticipated that Startek will utilize the net proceeds from the transaction to pay down amounts outstanding under its secured revolving credit facility and senior term loan facility agreement. The divestiture further strengthens balance sheet, allows Startek to focus on growing core business. The deal is expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2023.Startek Non-GAAP EPS of $0.10 misses by $0.01, revenue of $163.1M misses by $9.91M
Startek press release (NYSE:SRT): Q3 Non-GAAP EPS of $0.10 misses by $0.01. Revenue of $163.1M (-5.7% Y/Y) misses by $9.91M.Startek: An Update And After Action Review
Summary I previously wrote up Startek as a Strong Buy on July 17th, 2022, with a thesis related to a take-private offer. A number of material events have happened since the original write up which I outline here along with my reflections. Finally, I share some information and thoughts about my own trading around this idea. Ultimately, I've closed my position here. I think a case could be made to hold at these levels or sell. An Update Startek (SRT) is a company that I wrote up in July as a catalyst driven idea with an outstanding take-private offer at $5.40 per share. A number of things have happened in the interim so I wanted to share some updated thoughts on the company. The take private offer was made by Capital Square Partners ((CSP)) who own 56% of shares already. In my previous article I highlighted how current CEO Bharat Rao and former CEO Aparup Sengupta are both affiliated directly with CSP and that it was likely the offer was an opportunistic attempt to buy the company cheap. CSP revealed in June through a filing that they expected to get clarity on financing for this offer by August. On August 9th, 2022 the company released an 8-K which highlighted: Now CSP has informed the Special Committee that CSP was not able to arrange a debt and equity financing package on terms acceptable to CSP for its proposal, dated December 20, 2021, at $5.40 per share, that CSP has withdrawn its proposal, dated December 20, 2021, at $5.40 per share, and that CSP is replacing it with a new proposal, dated August 8, 2022, at $4.65 per share to be funded exclusively with equity financing. It revealed an awkward interaction from my viewpoint. Essentially CSP lowered their offer to $4.65 per share because they couldn't find financing. Why that makes Startek any less valuable is entirely unclear and again reflected what I believe was an opportunistic attempt to buy the company cheap. CSP was so confident in their ability to close this deal that they revealed that their lower price target had nothing to do with the fundamentals of the company. The stock opened at $3.71 on August 9th so the updated offer at $4.65 still represented a 25% premium to current prices. Yet the price was still below the stock price of $3.94 back in December 2021 when they first made an offer. The stock traded above the $4.00 mark for a bit amidst a broader market rally and as the deal was being reviewed by the special committee. That is until September 9th rolled around. TD Ameritrade The special committee took just one month to produce their decision: rejection of CSP's offer. In the 8-K they filed on Sept. 9th announcing this they highlighted: In July 2022, at the request of the Committee, management of the Company prepared an updated financial forecast (Forecast) for the 2022 calendar year and the four following calendar years 2023 to 2026. The Forecast projects annual revenue growth, beginning in calendar year 2023 and for the duration of the Forecast period, to exceed 5%. The Forecast projects that the margin for variable profit and for adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, will steadily increase over the Forecast period, with the latter approaching 11% by calendar year 2026. The Forecast was reviewed by the full Board of Directors of the Company to ensure the Board's comments were reflected. On August 1, the Company provided the Forecast to the Committee. The Committee and its financial and legal advisors separately engaged in several additional discussions with management of the Company to assist the Committee in determining whether to adopt the Forecast for purposes of evaluating the CSP proposal. Based upon this work, the Committee determined that the Forecast represents a reasonable and achievable plan to return the Company to improved financial performance over the Forecast period. The Committee adopted the Forecast for purposes of evaluating the CSP proposal. The factors that the Committee has considered include the trading history of Startek stock, financial analyses of Startek using the Forecast, the macroeconomic environment, the Company's limited float and liquidity, the ability to pay of a financial sponsor such as CSP, communications that the Committee has received from shareholders, and CSP's statement that it is currently not a seller of its majority stake in the Company. The Committee has determined, at this time, that the proposal at $4.65 is inadequate and not in the best interests of the shareholders of Startek. What's amusing about this for me is that the special committee, which is independent of CSP's interest, asked management to create a forecast of what they think the business will look like over the years leading up to 2026. Management led by Bharat Rao who is affiliated with CSP took the task seriously and created a model which showed revenue and profit growth in the coming years. The special committee had the full company board review this which includes Aparup Sengupta and two additional CSP affiliated board members. So all four of these CSP related folks signed off on this forecast which then the special committee had financial and legal advisors work to agree that it was a good forecast. So they adopted it as part of their review of the $4.65 take-private offer and decided that an offer at a P/B of 0.98x wasn't beneficial to Startek shareholders. And they let CSP know this on August 21st, a full three weeks before it was revealed in this filing: Foros, the Committee's financial advisor, notified CSP on August 21, 2022 that the Committee had determined that the proposed price of $4.65 was inadequate and explained the basis for this determination as described in the preceding paragraphs of this press release. Since that time, rather than submitting a revised proposal, CSP has repeatedly requested more "specific directional guidance on how [the Committee] is thinking about value and price." The Committee considered this request by taking into account that CSP already possesses the full Forecast and has understood since August 21 that the Committee is using this Forecast for its financial analysis of proposals by CSP. After considering this factor, as well as the Committee's objective of maximizing value for shareholders, the Committee determined and informed CSP that it would be inappropriate and redundant to provide additional directional guidance to CSP beyond the explanations already provided to CSP. The Committee has reiterated to CSP that the Committee remains available to evaluate and respond to a revised proposal by CSP. It seems that the special committee threw CSP for a loop simply by using a forecast that they helped create showing that the company is likely to experience growing revenue and profits in the coming years. Not altogether bad news if someone is a long term holder and believes in the prospects of this company. Yet for those playing the deal, the news capped a near year-long saga of will they or won't they actually do it. It seems CSP was happy to move forward at the $4.65 price and the special committee determined that this actually undervalues the company. With no clear catalyst to drive the price over the near term though many bailed out of the stock. Add to this the market's decided downturn in the past month and the price decline SRT makes some sense. Where Does that Leave Things Rejecting the CSP deal likely leaves only one option: operate the company. There are two reasons for this. The first is that CSP has previously stated they are not interested in selling their ownership stake. So a sale of the company beyond CSP is not likely unless they change their minds. The second piece driving this is that CSP clearly was unable to finance a deal above $4.65 in the first place. With even more uncertainty in the markets these days it's unlikely they are now somehow able to find financing and increase their offer. The question now is whether management can shift from the distraction of this process into operations mode. I have some concerns about management led by Bharat Rao given the debacle that this process has been and I'm not at all convinced that they are protecting shareholders' interests overall. The pattern I've seen again and again in this is CSP attempting to buy this company cheap from their fellow owners. It's not a pattern of how we can grow value for all shareholders. This is a red flag to me and I think the company's attempts at the end of this process to try and repeatedly get more information from the special committee shows that they still are looking for ways to buy this cheap if they can. I'm not interested in being long-term co-owners with CSP as an entity at this juncture as it seems like their goal is to take advantage of minority shareholders in my opinion. That's not a very good place to start even if there's value in the company. With a CSP affiliated CEO and four CSP affiliated board members there are still levers that they can use to pressure minority shareholders rather than simply growing the business for all owners.StarTek drops after holder CSP Management formally withdraws bid
StarTek Inc. (NYSE:SRT) fell 5.4% in after hours trading after the company's largest holder withdrew an offer for the company. StarTek holder CSP Management said it withdrew its proposal after the company earlier this month rejected its $4.65/share offer, according to a letter in a 13D/A filing. CSP owns 22.6 million shares, or a 56% stake in StarTek. "Though we continue to believe that the proposed valuation set forth in the Proposal reflects a full and fair price and compelling value to the holders of shares of StarTek Common Stock not beneficially owned by us, based on discussions with the Special Committee’s advisors and the Special Committee’s announcement on September 9, 2022, it is evident that the Special Committee has a different perspective and we would be unable to reach agreement with the Special Committee on an appropriate valuation at this time," CSP said in the letter. ."Therefore, we hereby withdraw the Proposal." CSP originally offered to buy StarTek(SRT) for $5.40/share in late December.Startek: Near-Term Catalyst Could Finalize Take-Private Deal At $5.40
Outstanding offer to purchase Startek for $5.40 or 86% premium to current prices. Offer is at a 5.4 EV/EBITDA which is low compared to industry average between 6.5-8.5. Near-term catalyst given acquiring company set to announce if they have financing before the end of August. Forced sellers due to Russell de-indexing have shares trading at not just a 52-week low but a 10-year low. SRT stock is trading at a P/B of 0.6 and a P/FCF of 3.26 – distressed valuations despite a five-year average annual free cash flow of $17m. Based on five different valuations, average upside is estimated at 107% between the next 1-2 years. Near-term catalysts may cause a big jump. Startek (SRT) is an undervalued microcap with a huge catalyst in the coming month related to an offer from December 2021 to take the company private at $5.40 per share or 86% premium to today’s prices. The offer comes from Capital Square Partners who own 56% of outstanding shares already and they expect to have clarity on financing availability within five to seven weeks according to a filing from June 21st, 2022. Given that range we may see an announcement related to the offer anywhere from July 25th into August. Additionally, we should see quarterly earnings for the company within the first two weeks of August. Both of these events are likely to serve as near term catalysts. And there’s an argument to be made that this is just the beginning of a process which could lead to an even higher buyout price which we will get into. Aside from the mechanics of this takeout offer is the fundamental undervaluation of the company at current prices. Consider these data points based on SRT priced at $2.90: P/B of 0.56 – priced for terminal decline despite profitability and growth of earnings. Cash position of $52.248m represents 45% of current market cap. Five-year average free cash flow of $17.334m. If we back out the cash position from the market cap SRT is trading for a P/FCF of 3.73. And finally, there is the fact that the stock is not just trading at a 52-week low, it is trading at a 10-year low. This is due in part to forced selling as a result of Startek being removed from 11 Russell indexes on June 24th and represents a market inefficiency we can take advantage of. This is a rare opportunity to buy a company trading below 4 times its average annual free cash flow with huge near-term catalysts before the end of August. We believe that the $5.40 per share offer from CSP represents a margin of safety in the name and given recent forced selling I suspect we’re near lows. Add to this an optionality that the $5.40 price is quite low compared to recent activity in the sector and we could perhaps see this go up even further. I highlight some undisclosed legal proceedings the company is exposed to which may or may not turn out to be of significant risk. I'm guessing they will not, but I am not a lawyer. I also note their large goodwill value on the balance sheet being a "critical audit matter" which implies risk here as well. All in all, I believe there’s an 86% margin of safety represented at current price of Startek and that with or without a takeover transaction the company is undervalued. I estimate a price target of $5.40 over the next 1-2 years. Startek’s Business History Startek is a global business process outsourcing ((BPO)) management company providing omni-channel customer experience, digital transformation, and technology services. The Company services over 190 clients across a range of industries with their staff of over 43,000 distributed around the world. Founded in 1987, they’ve been a public company since 1997 and recently underwent a major business combination with Aegis in 2018. Aegis was a portfolio company of Capital Square Partners and the formation resulted in CSP retaining 56% majority ownership of Startek. The combination essentially quadrupled the size of the company enabling a diversified $700m revenue base and no client concentrated above 10%. With operations in 13 countries and on 6 continents the new company was truly global and poised to leverage its new scale to grow. Which it did for a bit until the pandemic started which materially impacted all BPO companies. Loss per share was $0.99 in 2020 with 2021 EPS coming in at $0.04. The company seems to have weathered the storm and is optimizing its operations even further given the new environment, including shifting their management team and strategic focus. Startek is currently led by CEO Bharat Rao who has been with the company as President since October 2021. Rao succeeded Aparup Sengupta as CEO this past February ending Sengupta’s two year tenure. Sengupta previously was the CEO of pre-merger Aegis where he grew them from $60 million to $850 million in revenue over a seven-year period through both organic growth and acquisitions. There have been an additional five C-suite executives brought on this past year as well filling out the latest iteration of the management team. Of note is that Sengupta and Rao both are involved with majority owner Capital Square Partners. Sengupta is listed as an Operating Partner at the firm while Rao is listed as a Non-Executive Director. Just two months after Rao joined, and less than a year after Sengupta did, CSP made their non-binding $5.40 per share offer to take the company private. The offer represented a 37% premium over Startek's closing share price of $3.94 on December 17th. Sengupta remains on the company’s board with Rao and two other CSP affiliated folks. Capital Square Partners' Website Rao announced in March that the Board had “formed a special committee of independent directors to evaluate the proposal. They have brought on legal and financial advisors to thoroughly examine the deal.” Another quarterly earnings call passed with no update about the situation. Nearly six months after the original proposal was announced an update came in the form of the June 21st, 2022 SC 13D/A. In that filing CSP certified that they have $20m in equity financing and are seeking to fund the rest of the offer through debt financing which they are actively seeking: “These financial institutions have preliminarily indicated to the Reporting Persons ((CSP)) that, in approximately five to seven weeks’ time and subject to market conditions, they will know whether they are in a position to commit to providing such necessary debt financing.” That five-week period will end on July 25th. Quarterly earnings are expected to be announced August 5th as well. Evaluating Capital Square Partners’ Offer From my viewpoint, it seems like CSP may be making an opportunistic grab. The offer was made in December 2021 at a 37% premium to the $3.94 trading price at the time, a 52-week low. Morningstar Since the offer was made the stock has shed 31% more in value. Languishing in uncertainty, Startek has made not just new 52-week lows since but arrived at its lowest point in the past ten years. Morningstar The market seems to entirely discount the plausibility of the CSP offer or has overlooked it. Yet the folks involved with the company have been actively exploring whether or not this offer materially undervalued the company, including former CEO Chad Carlson. Carlson was CEO between 2011 and 2018 when he was replaced during the Aegis merger; he remains a Startek shareholder. An exclusive article from The Deal writer Tom Terrarosa dated March 21st highlighted the following: Carlson, specifically, has begun having conversations with private equity firms and other call center industry contacts about other possible deal options and even potentially launching a counter offer himself that could value Startek at closer to $600 million. Carlson has briefly discussed the matter of launching a counter offer with Startek's new CEO Bharat Rao and explained that a competitive auction process could yield a multiple of 8 to 10 times EBITDA, the sources said. The former CEO has attempted to gauge whether Startek's majority shareholders would consider a deal worth roughly 8 to 8.5 times Startek's 2021 EBITDA of $71 million, the sources said. The impetus for this is the CSP offer values Startek at around 0.4 times revenue and 3 times EBITDA. Historically companies in the sector have been sold for multiples of 0.8 times and 1.2 times revenue and between 6.5 times and 8.5 times EBITDA, according to The Deal article. Recent transactions in the industry have all been done at higher multiples than the CSP offer. One example is Sitel Group’s $2.24b take-private acquisition of Sykes Enterprises at about 11.3 times EBITDA and 1.3 times revenue. The last time Startek traded this low was under Carlson’s helm so I find it mildly entertaining and encouraging that he is actively involved in pushing for a higher price. While this is not central to my thesis, I believe it may lead to a bidding process on the company and a higher price either from CSP or a strategic buyer. The BPO industry overall is going through significant consolidation currently with 224 M&A transactions reported in the last two quarters alone, according to a report from Bridgepoint. This volume has been consistent over the last four years and is expected to continue as BPO operators seek to build scale in a fragmented industry expected to grow at a CAGR of 6.6% in the next five years. Bridgepoint Report Bridgepoint Report With strong M&A activity in the BPO market, the Startek board has a responsibility to explore all reasonable options to maximize shareholder value beyond the CSP offer. Bridgepoint data highlights that over the last five years the average EV/EBITDA multiple in the BPO sector was 12.6x. If we applied that multiple to Startek’s two-year average EBITDA of $65.3m we’d get an enterprise value of $822.78m. If we back out the total debt of $170m and the minority interest of $59m, and finally add the cash position of $52m we get an implied market capitalization of $645.78m – a 453% increase from current prices. While I do not expect those returns in this situation, I think this helps to provide a baseline understanding for where peer companies historically trade. From the data above it’s clear the multiple being offered for Startek is low compared to historical average for BPOs and recent valuations of peers in M&A activity. With Startek’s stock price seemingly in terminal decline we should turn to the financials of the company to understand its financial strength and why it may be trading for such a discount. Startek’s Finances and Buybacks Starting with the balance sheet we can see that the company has $52m in cash compared to $169.5m debt and seem to be in an overall stable position given cash flow and profitability. Goodwill and intangible assets are both quite high at $183m and $87m, respectively. This is compared to the shareholder equity of $193.424m. Goodwill is of particular note given it’s called out by the auditors as a critical audit matter. They note, “Auditing management’s significant assumptions used in the assessment of the recoverability of goodwill involved especially challenging and subjective auditor judgment.” Any impairment on either of these would be material to the book value of the company so this is a risk to monitor. Shareholder equity has come down 16% from $231m in 2018. They’ve also had four different CEOs and a pandemic during that time period, so it’s unsurprising that some value in the company has been lost. Solidification of the management team this past year under Rao should help stabilize a strategic vision and approach moving forward. Rao has mentioned his organizational rightsizing approach on both quarterly calls since joining. From Q4’21 Rao stated, ”We also spent much of the past quarter evaluating consolidation and rightsizing opportunities across our footprint. It has been our goal to maintain a lean and efficient organization that will be increasingly important as we look to produce meaningful revenue growth.” And in the most recent call Rao stated, “As a continuation of our efforts, we have been executing on a number of rightsizing initiatives to go along with our growth strategy. This includes optimizing various locations across the globe and working with our employees to develop the best solution for an evolving hybrid work environment.” While it remains to be seen what impact this would have over the long term, I think it’s illustrative of a management team looking to cut costs and find ways to drive further efficiency in the business. And one potential is possible assets sales of their campuses due to the work-from-home trend. Fellow Seeking Alpha contributor Junk Bondage wrote up Startek in May and included the table below which we are borrowing as it's still relevant. Junk Bondage’s article also has a useful peer comparison chart and helps provide additional context on the situation for interested readers. Junk Bondage's SA Article We can see from the data above that since the 2018 Aegis merger revenue grew 31%, adjusted EBITDA grew 87.56%, and EBITDA margins expanded by 43%. With growing profitability and $72.6m in FCF from the last three years it seems that this is not a company in terminal decline despite trading at a P/B of 0.6. Management has approved $4m in share buybacks in the last year. Since then, they’ve retired 672,176 shares which is about 1.6% of shares outstanding. The average purchase price has been at 4.97 which is 84% higher than prices today. With $831,229 left authorized for share repurchases as of March, it’s likely we’ll see that fully utilized by the next quarter. Author's consolidation of company filing data We can note as well that in two periods in the last year management have been net buyers of the stock at prices above $5.40. The August 31, 2021 period price per share of $6.06 is 109% above current prices. What’s interesting here is that we are given a glimpse into the opportunistic nature of this takeover offer. Consider that management at Startek with Sengupta at the helm believed their stock was undervalued at $6.06 so Sengupta put that money to work by repurchasing shares. They then put even more money to work in the next period at an average cost of $5.51 per share. It seems a bit odd then that Rao and Sengupta’s CSP made an offer below that price implying that the company was not undervalued at $6.06 or $5.51 and in fact is only worth $5.40. To go from undervalued at $6.06 to fair value of $5.40 in under a year would suggest to me a significant change in perspective on the prospects of the company or some sort of write-down. Neither seems to be the case and in fact management seems bullish as ever about their near-term investments yielding long term results for shareholders. Ronald Gillette, Strategic Advisor and Head of Business Transformation brought on in February, said this of the company’s strategy. Our approach is simple. We want to capitalize on the opportunities that we've set up for ourselves while investing heavily into the future. I want to reiterate that we anticipate seeing limited growth in our bottom line for the near-term. With the work that we are focused on, we are looking to position Startek for long-term success, and we are willing to invest in ourselves to do so. We believe that there is still a lot of untapped potential in this space we operate in and we have a strong foundation in place to pursue these opportunities. We remain as confident as ever in our company's position and our ability to drive long-term value to our shareholders. Not to belabor the point here, but again those long-term results just one year ago were believed to be worth so much more than $6.06 that it would be book value accretive to repurchase them –- now they are somehow pegged at a $5.40 valuation. I’m not sure this is a tenable position for CSP and Rao to hold moving forward which could drive the takeout offer higher even without a competitor. Why Is Startek Trading So Low? At a base level we can see that the market has clearly not ascribed any meaningful value to the CSP offer of $5.40. For nearly six months there was no information on the deal which didn’t help matters and the announcement on June 21st didn’t seem to change the market’s perception of the deal with the stock closing lower the day of the announcement. It’s continued lower due in part to forced selling related to delisting from 11 Russell indices which occurred on June 24th. Tikr Average volume for SRT in the weeks before delisting was around 70k shares a day. On delisting day there was a ~2500% surge in volume to 1.86m trading hands. And in the weeks since delisting the average volume has increased above 100k per day. Given how widely used the Russell indexes are, tons of indiscriminate selling are happening as a result of this change and putting downward pressure on the stock price. This pressure is compounded by the low amount of shares likely actually trading hands. Let’s look at share ownership for a second by viewing their 2021 proxy.Startek: Event-Driven Opportunity With 44% Potential Upside At Proposed Buyout Price
Singapore-Based private equity firm Capital Square Partners engineered a combination of Aegis Global and 'old' Startek in 2018 to create the 'new' Startek that exists today. This micro-cap business process outsourcing company runs outsourced customer contact centers, has improved sales and profitability, and has a declining stock price. On December 20, 2021, Capital Square Partners disclosed that it had submitted a 'preliminary, non-binding proposal' to acquire all the outstanding shares of Startek not already owned by it for $5.40 per share. The proposed $5.40 cash offer price represents 44% upside from Startek's closing price on Friday, April 29, 2022.StarTek (NYSE:SRT) Might Be Having Difficulty Using Its Capital Effectively
If you're not sure where to start when looking for the next multi-bagger, there are a few key trends you should keep an...StarTek (NYSE:SRT) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the...StarTek (NYSE:SRT) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility...A Look At The Fair Value Of StarTek, Inc. (NYSE:SRT)
How far off is StarTek, Inc. ( NYSE:SRT ) from its intrinsic value? Using the most recent financial data, we'll take a...Is StarTek, Inc. (NYSE:SRT) Potentially Undervalued?
StarTek, Inc. ( NYSE:SRT ), is not the largest company out there, but it received a lot of attention from a substantial...StarTek, Inc. (NYSE:SRT) Is About To Turn The Corner
We feel now is a pretty good time to analyse StarTek, Inc.'s ( NYSE:SRT ) business as it appears the company may be on...Will StarTek (NYSE:SRT) Multiply In Value Going Forward?
If we want to find a potential multi-bagger, often there are underlying trends that can provide clues. In a perfect...Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In StarTek, Inc. (NYSE:SRT)?
A look at the shareholders of StarTek, Inc. ( NYSE:SRT ) can tell us which group is most powerful. Institutions will...What Do The Returns On Capital At StarTek (NYSE:SRT) Tell Us?
Finding a business that has the potential to grow substantially is not easy, but it is possible if we look at a few key...주주 수익률
| SRT | US Professional Services | US 시장 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7D | 0.2% | 5.0% | 1.1% |
| 1Y | 11.6% | -22.1% | 28.7% |
수익률 대 산업: SRT은 지난 1년 동안 -22.1%의 수익을 기록한 US Professional Services 산업보다 더 좋은 성과를 냈습니다.
수익률 대 시장: SRT은 지난 1년 동안 28.7%를 기록한 US 시장보다 저조한 성과를 냈습니다.
주가 변동성
| SRT volatility | |
|---|---|
| SRT Average Weekly Movement | 8.4% |
| Professional Services Industry Average Movement | 7.7% |
| Market Average Movement | 7.2% |
| 10% most volatile stocks in US Market | 16.5% |
| 10% least volatile stocks in US Market | 3.1% |
안정적인 주가: SRT의 주가는 지난 3개월 동안 US 시장보다 변동성이 컸습니다.
시간에 따른 변동성: SRT의 주간 변동성(8%)은 지난 1년 동안 안정적이었습니다.
회사 소개
| 설립 | 직원 수 | CEO | 웹사이트 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | 35,000 | Bharat Rao | www.startek.com |
Startek, Inc. 기초 지표 요약
| SRT 기초 통계 | |
|---|---|
| 시가총액 | US$178.33m |
| 순이익 (TTM) | -US$33.77m |
| 매출 (TTM) | US$369.87m |
SRT는 고평가되어 있습니까?
공정 가치 및 평가 분석 보기순이익 및 매출
| SRT 손익계산서 (TTM) | |
|---|---|
| 매출 | US$369.87m |
| 매출원가 | US$313.88m |
| 총이익 | US$56.00m |
| 기타 비용 | US$89.77m |
| 순이익 | -US$33.77m |
최근 보고된 실적
Sep 30, 2023
다음 실적 발표일
해당 없음
| 주당순이익(EPS) | -0.84 |
| 총이익률 | 15.14% |
| 순이익률 | -9.13% |
| 부채/자본 비율 | 45.6% |
SRT의 장기 실적은 어땠습니까?
과거 실적 및 비교 보기기업 분석 및 재무 데이터 상태
| 데이터 | 최종 업데이트 (UTC 시간) |
|---|---|
| 기업 분석 | 2024/01/06 12:42 |
| 종가 | 2024/01/04 00:00 |
| 수익 | 2023/09/30 |
| 연간 수익 | 2022/12/31 |
데이터 소스
당사의 기업 분석에 사용되는 데이터는 S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC에서 제공됩니다. 아래 데이터는 이 보고서를 생성하기 위해 분석 모델에서 사용됩니다. 데이터는 정규화되므로 소스가 제공된 후 지연이 발생할 수 있습니다.
| 패키지 | 데이터 | 기간 | 미국 소스 예시 * |
|---|---|---|---|
| 기업 재무제표 | 10년 |
| |
| 분석가 컨센서스 추정치 | +3년 |
|
|
| 시장 가격 | 30년 |
| |
| 지분 구조 | 10년 |
| |
| 경영진 | 10년 |
| |
| 주요 개발 | 10년 |
|
* 미국 증권에 대한 예시이며, 비(非)미국 증권에는 해당 국가의 규제 서식 및 자료원을 사용합니다.
별도로 명시되지 않는 한 모든 재무 데이터는 연간 기간을 기준으로 하지만 분기별로 업데이트됩니다. 이를 TTM(최근 12개월) 또는 LTM(지난 12개월) 데이터라고 합니다. 자세히 알아보기.
분석 모델 및 스노우플레이크
이 보고서를 생성하는 데 사용된 분석 모델에 대한 자세한 내용은 당사의 Github 페이지에서 확인하실 수 있습니다. 또한 보고서 활용 방법에 대한 가이드와 YouTube 튜토리얼도 제공합니다.
Simply Wall St 분석 모델을 설계하고 구축한 세계적 수준의 팀에 대해 알아보세요.
산업 및 섹터 지표
산업 및 섹터 지표는 Simply Wall St가 6시간마다 계산하며, 프로세스에 대한 자세한 내용은 Github에서 확인할 수 있습니다.
분석가 소스
Startek, Inc.는 4명의 분석가가 다루고 있습니다. 이 중 2명의 분석가가 우리 보고서에 입력 데이터로 사용되는 매출 또는 수익 추정치를 제출했습니다. 분석가의 제출 자료는 하루 종일 업데이트됩니다.
| 분석가 | 기관 |
|---|---|
| David Koning | Baird |
| Alexander Paris | Barrington Research Associates, Inc. |
| Zachary Cummins | B. Riley Securities, Inc. |