공시 • May 15
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc Reaffirms Revenue Guidance for the Full Year 2026 Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. reaffirmed revenue guidance for the Full year 2026. For the full year 2026, the company expects to achieve revenue between $300 million and $400 million. 공시 • May 03
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. Announces Chief Financial Officer Changes Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. announced the appointment of Alessandro Lagi as Chief Financial Officer, effective June 8, 2026. Lagi joins Eos from Johnson Controls, where he most recently led the Global FP&A and Growth finance team, overseeing planning, commercial, service, and system finance while helping drive stronger earnings performance, cash generation, operational accountability and enterprise transformation. Prior to Johnson Controls, he held several CFO roles overseeing global and regional multi-billion-dollar operations with responsibilities across Europe, Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, and Latin America. At Baker Hughes, he served as Global CFO for the Oilfield Equipment segment, leading finance across dozens of countries and a global manufacturing footprint while driving portfolio optimization and improved profitability. Eos also Nathan Kroeker for his leadership as Interim Chief Financial Officer. Kroeker will continue in his role as Chief Commercial Officer, leading Eos’ commercial business, focusing on commercial expansion, revenue growth, and positioning Eos as the preferred partner in long duration energy storage. This appointment strengthens the Eos leadership team as the Company scales operations, advances manufacturing execution, and supports growing customer deployments. Eos remains focused on leadership that drives disciplined execution, operational scale, and long-term shareholder value. 공시 • Apr 24
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. to Report Q1, 2026 Results on May 13, 2026 Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. announced that they will report Q1, 2026 results Pre-Market on May 13, 2026 공시 • Apr 10
Eos Energy Enterprises Announces Executive Appointments Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. announced that Erik Todd joined Eos as Executive Vice President, Sales, bringing more than 20 years of experience leading large-scale energy and infrastructure sales organizations where he managed a global $1 Billion+ industrial infrastructure business. Cristi Thomas joined Eos as Senior Vice President, Projects & Delivery, with experience leading complex, infrastructure scale energy projects across development, construction, commissioning, and operations. These additions strengthen Eos’ ability to convert capacity into executed projects and deliver on customer commitments. 공시 • Apr 01
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc., Annual General Meeting, Jun 03, 2026 Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc., Annual General Meeting, Jun 03, 2026. 공시 • Mar 28
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. Appoints Nathaniel Fick as Independent Common Class III Director, Effective March 24, 2026 Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. announced the appointment of Nathaniel (Nate) Fick to its Board of Directors as an independent Common Class III director, effective March 24, 2026. Fick brings extensive leadership experience spanning national security, technology, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence (AI), and complex infrastructure—capabilities increasingly relevant as energy storage becomes embedded in critical grid operations. Fick currently serves as Chief Strategy Officer for Equities and Senior Managing Director at Cerberus Capital Management. Before his current role, Fick served as the inaugural U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Cyberspace & Digital Policy from 2023 to 2025, where he led U.S. international engagement on cybersecurity, digital infrastructure, and emerging technologies. Prior to his government service, he was Chief Executive Officer of cybersecurity company Endgame and oversaw its integration into Elastic following its acquisition. He has also served as an operating partner at Bessemer Venture Partners for eight years. Earlier in his career, Fick served as a U.S. Marine Corps infantry and reconnaissance officer, including combat deployments in Afghanistan and Iraq, and is the author of the New York Times bestselling memoir One Bullet Away. 공시 • Mar 07
Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP Files Securities Fraud Lawsuit on Behalf of Eos Energy Enterprises Investors Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP announced that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, captioned Yung v. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:26-cv-02372, on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Eos Energy Enterprises securities between November 5, 2025 and February 26, 2026, inclusive. Plaintiff pursues claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On February 26, 2026, Eos Energy announced fourth quarter and full year 2025 results, reporting, among other things, full year 2025 revenue of $114.2 million, falling far short of the Company’s previously issued guidance of $150 to $160 million. Management attributed these results to, in part, that battery line downtime ran well above industry norms and the ability for the automated bipolar production to hit quality targets took longer than expected. The Company further disclosed it had uncovered inefficiencies that result in longer end-to-end production times. On this news, Eos Energy’s stock price fell $4.39, or 39.4%, to close at $6.74 per share on February 26, 2026, thereby injuring investors. The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the Company was unable to achieve the ramp in production and capacity utilization required to achieve its previously set guidance; (2) the Company’s battery line downtime was running well above industry norms, the design intent of the line, and internal forecasts; (3) the Company was experiencing delays in the ability for its automated bipolar production to hit quality targets; (4) the Company’s inadequate systems and processes prevented it from ensuring reasonably accurate guidance and that its public disclosures were timely, accurate, and complete; and (5) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. 
