공지 • Apr 14
Sable Resources Ltd. Reports Drill Results Extending The Pyros Cu–Au–Mo Porphyry System, San Juan, Argentina
Sable Resources Ltd. reported positive results from its most recent drill program at the El Fierro Project’s Pyros porphyry system, located in San Juan Province, Argentina. The drill program was undertaken between November 2025 and January 2026 and consisted of 11 drill holes totaling 3,466 metres. The program was fully funded by Moxico Resources plc under the Moxico earn-in agreement. Results from the drill program continue to define a large, continuous Miocene Cu–Au–Mo porphyry system hosted within Permian granites and diorite intrusions. Drilling to-date and the resulting integrated interpretation now outlines a mineralized footprint of approximately 720 m by 580 m, centered on an early mineral, strongly altered, barren-to-low-grade porphyry stock. Interpretation of the drill data, combined with surface mapping, geophysics, and geochemistry, has significantly improved the understanding of the geometry of the system. Mineralization follows a coherent pattern, particularly along its western margin, and remains open to the south and to the north beneath sub-cropping Permian host granite. Strong molybdenum and copper soil anomalies, porphyry-style veining, and remnants of advanced argillic alteration indicate potential for further extension of the mineralized system. Hole FZ-DH-25-92 was originally drilled in April 2025 to the depth of 401m ending in mineralization and then extended during the most recent campaign to a depth of 597m. The hole extension intercepted 79.5m of additional mineralization from 401 to 480.5m. Combining the previously released intervals of hole 92 with the new results and expressing them as CuEq, the results are: 116.2m @ 0.45% CuEq (0.24% Cu, 0.14 g/t Au, 197 ppm Mo) from 18m; 189.1m @ 0.50% CuEq (0.19% Cu, 0.11 g/t Au, 456 ppm Mo) from 291.4m; including 20m @ 1.64% CuEq (0.58% Cu, 0.3 g/t Au, 0.13% Mo) from 320m; including 8m @ 3.06% CuEq (1.03% Cu, 0.51 g/t Au, 0.27% Mo) from 328m; 157.2m @ 172 ppm Mo from 134.2m. FZ-DH-25-94: 172.0m of 0.28% CuEq (0.16%Cu, 0.12 g/t Au, 122 ppm Mo) from 38.0m; 20.8m of 0.19% CuEq (0.11%Cu, 0.07 g/t Au, 76 ppm Mo) from 358.2m. FZ-DH-25-95: 128.3m of 0.28% CuEq (0.16% Cu; 105 ppm Mo; 0.09 g/t Au) from 36.7m; including 53.5m of 0.39% CuEq (0.21% Cu; 0.14 g/t Au; 125 ppm Mo) from 81.0m; including 18.0m of 0.49% CuEq (0.3% Cu; 0.17 g/t Au; 115 ppm Mo) from 98.0m; and 25.0m of 0.29% CuEq (0.15% Cu; 171 ppm Mo; 0.07 g/t Au) from 140.0m. FZ-DH-25-96: 34.9m @ 0.23% CuEq (0.14% Cu, 0.09 g/t Au, 34 ppm Mo) from 216m; 20m @ 0.23% CuEq (0.13% Cu, 179 ppm Mo, 0.022 g/t Au) from 281m. FZ-DH-25-97: 24.8m @ 0.25% CuEq (0.14%Cu, 0.12 g/t Au, 18 ppm Mo) from 24m; 36m @ 0.21% CuEq (0.11%Cu, 0.095 g/t Au, 31 ppm Mo) from 134m. FZ-DH-25-98: 69.9m @ 0.3% CuEq (0.14% Cu, 0.13 g/t Au, 82 ppm Mo) from 71m; 125.1m @ 0.28% CuEq (0.16% Cu, 0.1 g/t Au, 75 ppm Mo) from 174.9m. FZ-DH-25-99: 34m of 0.32% CuEq (0.14 g/t Au, 0.17% Cu, 54 ppm Mo) from 214m. FZ-DH-25-100: 123m @ 0.23% CuEq (0.11% Cu, 105 ppm Mo, 0.079 g/t Au) from 104.0m; 136m @ 0.27% CuEq (0.15% Cu, 99 ppm Mo, 0.089 g/t Au) from 244.0m; including 38m @ 0.29% CuEq (0.15% Cu, 130 ppm Mo, 0.092 g/t Au) from 244.0m; and 18.15m @ 0.37% CuEq (0.2% Cu, 169 ppm Mo, 0.1 g/t Au) from 298.7; 20m @ 0.16% CuEq (0.1% Cu, 30 ppm Mo, 0.052 g/t Au) from 26.0m. FZ-DH-25-101: 16m @ 0.22% CuEq (0.18% Cu, 53 ppm Mo, 0.037 g/t Au) from 39m; 27.55m @ 0.18% CuEq (0.1% Cu, 66 ppm Mo, 0.062 g/t Au) from 203m. The Cu-Au-Mo mineralization intercepted by most of the drill holes reported in this news release follows a ring geometry elongated in a NNE direction. Within the ring, mineralization is hosted within different phases of Miocene diorite intrusions as well as within the Permian granite host. Varying mineral and alteration assemblages are observed within the mineralized ring including chalcopyrite, molybdenite, and sericite filling dissolution cavities, chalcopyrite and molybdenite disseminated or within veinlets in potassic altered diorites, and chalcopyrite cementing magmatic-hydrothermal breccias. The mineralized ring appears to surround a weakly mineralized high-temperature biotite-albite altered diorite core. The current drilling defines a large and continuous mineralized system that remains open in multiple directions. Future work will focus on expanding higher-grade zones associated with magmatic-hydrothermal breccias and testing undrilled targets to the south, where geochemical and alteration signatures indicate strong potential for additional mineralization. True width of the mineralization is unknown at this point. Copper Equivalent has been calculated using prices of USD 4.00 per pound of Cu, USD 3,000 per ounce of Au, and USD 22.00 per pound of Mo. Given that no current or historical metallurgical studies are available, recoveries of 90% for all metals have been assumed based on comparisons with similar projects in South America and Canada. Sample preparation for projects in Argentina is carried out by ALS Minerals, at its facility located in Mendoza with analyses carried out at their laboratory in Lima, Peru. Sample preparation includes drying in an oven at a maximum temperature of 60°C, fine crushing of the sample to at least 70% passing less than 2 mm, sample splitting using a riffle splitter, and pulverizing a 250 g split to at least 85% passing 75 microns (code PREP-31). The samples contained in this news release were analyzed by methods Au-AA24 (Fire Assay Fusion and Atomic Absorption Spectrometry finish) and ME-MS61 (Four Acid Digestion with Mass Spectrometry finish); the latter one includes 48 elements (Al, Ag, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Fe, Ga, Ge, Hf, In, K, La, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Nb, Ni, P, Pb, Rb, Re, S, Sb, Sc, Se, Sn, Sr, Ta, Te, Th, Ti, Tl, U, V, W, Y, Zn, Zr). Both digestion methods dissolve most minerals but not all elements are quantitatively extracted in some sample matrices. ALS additionally collects a subsample from the coarse reject to be analyzed by Terraspec; spectral data is sent to AISIRIS Australia to be processed and interpreted. Control samples (standards, blanks, and duplicates) are inserted systematically, and their results evaluated according to the Company protocols.