This company has been acquired
Volta(VLTA)株式概要
Volta Inc. operates a network of smart media-enabled charging stations for electric vehicles in the United States. 詳細
VLTA Community Fair Values
See what others think this stock is worth. Follow their fair value or set your own to get alerts.
Volta Inc. 競合他社
価格と性能
| 過去の株価 | |
|---|---|
| 現在の株価 | US$0.86 |
| 52週高値 | US$3.52 |
| 52週安値 | US$0.30 |
| ベータ | 2.61 |
| 1ヶ月の変化 | 0.85% |
| 3ヶ月変化 | 141.70% |
| 1年変化 | -73.24% |
| 3年間の変化 | n/a |
| 5年間の変化 | n/a |
| IPOからの変化 | -91.37% |
最新ニュース
Volta: Bad Story Ends
Summary Volta accepts an offer from Shell for $0.86 per share in cash. The EV charging station network was running out of cash while burning over $65 million per quarter. The stock is a sell with Volta trading at the acquisition price and no likely bidding war to take place. In a horrible ending for investors stuck in Volta (VLTA) since the SPAC deal closed, the EV charging station company accepted a minimal buyout price. Considering the ongoing operating losses, a deal with Shell USA Inc. (SHEL) was probably the best possible outcome at this point. My investment rating is now a Sell, with the stock trading at the deal price in a sharp warning to investors in other EV charging station stocks. Source: FinViz Down Over 90% Volta went public back in August 2021 in a SPAC deal with Tortoise Corp II. The company just accepted a deal to be acquired by Shell for ~$169 million at a price of $0.86/share in cash. The stock hit a low of $0.30 at the end of 2022 on tax loss selling, so shareholders probably lucked out a large energy company wanted to own a charging station operator. The move is odd in that these charging station companies don't generate much in the way of gross margins questioning why Shell doesn't just buy from the market. Amazingly, Volta traded up to $15 prior to closing the SPAC deal. The market fell into the EV charging station hype due to the shift towards clean energy, but the sector remains on the bleeding edge failing to generate much in the way of gross margins while wilding spending on sales and marketing expenses. The energy giant possibly sees some potential in the media model where Volta has failed in the last year since going public. The company recently reported Q3'22 results where revenues were only $14.4 million for a business with a network of 5,700 screens delivering charging solutions to EV owners and one billion monthly impressions to the advertisers. The problem is that Volta actually had higher gross margins with cost of sales only in the $8.8 million range. The issue is that the charging station company is spending over $40 million quarterly on SG&A costs. No company can survive very long with revenue growth having stalled and operating expenses are vastly higher than the revenues. In fact, Volta technically makes no money when factoring in depreciation and interest expenses before even approaching the large SG&A costs to presumably build out the charging station network and make sales deals for the media network. Everyone understands the need to invest in order to build the network. The issue is matching revenues with the spending level. Any company has to have a reasonable path to reaching cash flow positive and Volta failed on this metric in part to revenues not materializing as projected. No Cash Investors should learn from the Volta story with other SPACs regarding cash balances and burn rates. The company reported a Q3'22 adjusted EBITDA loss of $30.9 million, up from $22.1 million last year. The charging station network company has an EBITDA loss of $105.7 million for the YTD period. The problem is that Volta only generated Q3'22 revenues of $14.4 million and the analysts predict the company generating just $18.2 million in the strong media quarter of Q4. Volta doesn't have cash and the company still has to pay for the charging stations in order to install new ones requiring a massive amount of cash to fund network development and operating losses. The company ended September with a cash balance of just $15.6 million with debt levels already at $28 million. The problem is that cash burn has averaged over $65 million per quarter in 2022 due to the $119.6 million loss from operations this year through September and another $80.2 million loss on the purchase of equipment without even mentioning software and technology patent costs of $5.4 million. At this level of spending, Volta needed to raise magnitudes of more cash when the selling price was $10 per share. The company would need another $500 million to cover similar cash burn rates for the next 2 years alone.Volta Inc. (NYSE:VLTA) Just Reported, And Analysts Assigned A US$1.21 Price Target
Shareholders of Volta Inc. ( NYSE:VLTA ) will be pleased this week, given that the stock price is up 10% to US$0.70...Recent updates
株主還元
| VLTA | US Specialty Retail | US 市場 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7D | 0.8% | -1.5% | 1.2% |
| 1Y | -73.2% | -2.1% | 27.0% |
業界別リターン: VLTA過去 1 年間で-2.1 % の収益を上げたUS Specialty Retail業界を下回りました。
リターン対市場: VLTAは、過去 1 年間で27 % のリターンを上げたUS市場を下回りました。
価格変動
| VLTA volatility | |
|---|---|
| VLTA Average Weekly Movement | 9.5% |
| Specialty Retail Industry Average Movement | 7.4% |
| Market Average Movement | 7.2% |
| 10% most volatile stocks in US Market | 16.9% |
| 10% least volatile stocks in US Market | 3.0% |
安定した株価: VLTAの株価は、 US市場と比較して過去 3 か月間で変動しています。
時間の経過による変動: VLTAの 週次ボラティリティ は、過去 1 年間で16%から9%に減少しました。
会社概要
| 設立 | 従業員 | CEO(最高経営責任者 | ウェブサイト |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 379 | Vince Cubbage | voltacharging.com |
Volta Inc. 基礎のまとめ
| VLTA 基礎統計学 | |
|---|---|
| 時価総額 | US$149.82m |
| 収益(TTM) | -US$154.63m |
| 売上高(TTM) | US$54.60m |
VLTA は割高か?
公正価値と評価分析を参照収益と収入
| VLTA 損益計算書(TTM) | |
|---|---|
| 収益 | US$54.60m |
| 売上原価 | US$39.19m |
| 売上総利益 | US$15.41m |
| その他の費用 | US$170.04m |
| 収益 | -US$154.63m |
直近の収益報告
Dec 31, 2022
次回決算日
該当なし
| 一株当たり利益(EPS) | -0.89 |
| グロス・マージン | 28.23% |
| 純利益率 | -283.21% |
| 有利子負債/自己資本比率 | 8.2% |
VLTA の長期的なパフォーマンスは?
過去の実績と比較を見る企業分析と財務データの現状
| データ | 最終更新日(UTC時間) |
|---|---|
| 企業分析 | 2023/04/02 11:26 |
| 終値 | 2023/03/30 00:00 |
| 収益 | 2022/12/31 |
| 年間収益 | 2022/12/31 |
データソース
企業分析に使用したデータはS&P Global Market Intelligence LLC のものです。本レポートを作成するための分析モデルでは、以下のデータを使用しています。データは正規化されているため、ソースが利用可能になるまでに時間がかかる場合があります。
| パッケージ | データ | タイムフレーム | 米国ソース例 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 会社財務 | 10年 |
| |
| アナリストのコンセンサス予想 | +プラス3年 |
|
|
| 市場価格 | 30年 |
| |
| 所有権 | 10年 |
| |
| マネジメント | 10年 |
| |
| 主な進展 | 10年 |
|
* 米国証券を対象とした例であり、非米国証券については、同等の規制書式および情報源を使用。
特に断りのない限り、すべての財務データは1年ごとの期間に基づいていますが、四半期ごとに更新されます。これは、TTM(Trailing Twelve Month)またはLTM(Last Twelve Month)データとして知られています。詳細はこちら。
分析モデルとスノーフレーク
本レポートを生成するために使用した分析モデルの詳細は当社のGithubページでご覧いただけます。また、レポートの使用方法に関するガイドやYoutubeのチュートリアルも掲載しています。
シンプリー・ウォールストリート分析モデルを設計・構築した世界トップクラスのチームについてご紹介します。
業界およびセクターの指標
私たちの業界とセクションの指標は、Simply Wall Stによって6時間ごとに計算されます。
アナリスト筋
Volta Inc. 3 これらのアナリストのうち、弊社レポートのインプットとして使用した売上高または利益の予想を提出したのは、 。アナリストの投稿は一日中更新されます。7
| アナリスト | 機関 |
|---|---|
| Jonathan Dorsheimer | Canaccord Genuity |
| Matt Summerville | D.A. Davidson & Co. |
| Mark Delaney | Goldman Sachs |