This company has been acquired
Twitter(TWTR)株式概要
Twitter, Inc. operates as a platform for public self-expression and conversation in real-time. 詳細
TWTR Community Fair Values
Create NarrativeSee what others think this stock is worth. Follow their fair value or set your own to get alerts.
Twitter, Inc. 競合他社
価格と性能
| 過去の株価 | |
|---|---|
| 現在の株価 | US$53.70 |
| 52週高値 | US$55.64 |
| 52週安値 | US$31.30 |
| ベータ | 0.53 |
| 1ヶ月の変化 | 27.58% |
| 3ヶ月変化 | 29.06% |
| 1年変化 | -1.09% |
| 3年間の変化 | 79.18% |
| 5年間の変化 | 172.45% |
| IPOからの変化 | 19.60% |
最新ニュース
Elon Musk said to have ordered imminent Twitter layoffs
Billionaire Elon Musk is said to have ordered layoffs at Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) as soon as Saturday, just days after he took over the social media behemoth. The Tesla (TSLA) chief, who completed his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter on Thursday, is said to have planned for cuts across the company, with some areas to be impacted more than others, according to a New York Times report, which cited people familiar. The scope of the reductions wasn't immediately known. Twitter has about 7,500 employees. The layoffs are expected to come before Tuesday, when the employees were expected to receive stock grants as part of their compensation, according to the NYT report. The report comes after a Washington Post story earlier this month said that Musk planned to cut 75% of the Twitter (TWTR) workforce after he took over, a report that was later denied by the social media company. Also see from earlier Saturday, Musk, Trump, Zuckerberg: Twitter buy signals new stage in the social media wars.Twitter: Government Highly Unlikely To Block Deal
Summary Twitter is down big in pre-market trading on a Bloomberg report about unhappy government officials. I have no doubt there are government officials that are unhappy with Elon Musk's conduct on Twitter and elsewhere. I can understand government entities wanting to look into the billionaire's geopolitical ties and wheeling and dealing. Odds seem low that this will ultimately derail the deal at $54.20 between Twitter shareholders and Elon Musk. Twitter, Inc. (TWTR) is down massively in pre-market trading as there's been a Bloomberg report saying: "Biden administration officials are discussing whether the US should subject some of Elon Musk's ventures to national security reviews, including the deal for Twitter Inc. and SpaceX's Starlink satellite network." In my opinion, this opens up an opportunity to add to a Twitter position at very low prices. These discussions seem to have borne out of Elon Musk's recent meddling in Russia's war on Ukraine. Officials are (according to Bloomberg) worried about his pro-Russian stance. In addition they are worried about (the money quote): They are also concerned by his plans to buy Twitter with a group of foreign investors. The deal for Twitter is funded by Elon Musk, a group of equity investors, and a debt package from a group of banks. The equity portion of the deal includes the parties government officials are worried about, according to Bloomberg: "Prince Alwaleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia, Binance Holdings Ltd. -- a digital-asset exchange founded and run by a Chinese native -- and Qatar's sovereign wealth fund." To offer some perspective, Musk is putting up $33.5 billion. This latter group of investors is putting up $7.1 billion. This group includes Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Al Saud, who is rolling over his current stake worth $1.9 billion. Note that he already owned Twitter before this deal came to fruition. This is not a new thing. Note that I'm not a lawyer or law professional. Having said that, according to the merger agreement, Musk is on the hook for the entire equity portion. If pieces of the equity financing fall through, Musk needs to find a way to cover the shortfall. Maybe he's already trying to get some new investors in as he seemed to be back to the promoter playbook on the most recent Tesla's earnings call. The Bloomberg article talks a lot about SpaceX as well. I can imagine the U.S. government wants to put Elon Musk under some scrutiny or put some informal pressure on him not to mess with U.S. geopolitics. Some people will argue Elon Musk is trying to deliberately blow up his Twitter deal through his Russia/Ukraine shenanigans and even by more prominently talking about China. Under this theory, he would hope to get some kind of enemy of the state label making him unfit to own a social media outfit like Twitter. Per Bloomberg: The discussions are still at an early stage, the people familiar said on condition of anonymity. Officials in the US government and intelligence community are weighing what tools, if any, are available that would allow the federal government to review Musk's ventures.Twitter V. Musk: What Could Go Wrong
Summary How did we get here? What next? Two possible routes to the end. How we got here 2022 has been the golden age for merger arb with many wide deal spreads, but the widest of them all is Twitter (TWTR). In April, Elon Musk signed a definitive agreement to buy Twitter. At the time, he said that, Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated. I also want to make Twitter better than ever by enhancing the product with new features, making the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots, and authenticating all humans. Twitter has tremendous potential – I look forward to working with the company and the community of users to unlock it. In his own words, he bought Twitter in part to defeat bots and authenticate humans; demonstrably, this was a problem that he knew existed and that he planned to fix. The next month, Musk suffered from buyer’s remorse. In his own words, it was due to his concerns over Putin’s aggression in Ukraine and the threat of World War III. He also grew increasingly agitated over Tesla’s (TSLA) poor stock performance, which would increase the cost of Twitter in terms of the number of Tesla shares he’d have to sell. Musk’s problem was that neither his real macro concerns nor his specific problems with Tesla-driven wealth destruction were outs under the merger agreement. They were problems, but they were his problems. They were excellent examples of things he should have thought of ahead of time. They could have potentially allowed him to pay something in the $30s per share instead of the contractual price in the $50s. So Musk was forced to turn to one thinly-veiled pretext after another to see if anything could stick. It didn’t. The buyer is erratic and conducted much of his disclosure via crazy tweets. We have been active shareholders, including writing an open letter to Twitter’s board immediately following Musk’s first of several purported deal terminations, encouraging the board to fight for the original deal. Fight they did. Meanwhile, Musk’s constant stream of tweets badly damaged his legal case. My confidence is in the iron-clad Twitter definitive merger agreement, in Wachtell Lipton’s ability to uphold it, in Chancellor McCormick’s ability to judge, and in the Delaware court and rule of law generally. That's why TWTR is one of my three biggest positions and best ideas for 2022 along with Renren (RENN) and Amplify (AMPY). YCharts The deal has a number of conditions including HSR approval as well as sign offs from the UK CMA, NSI, and Twitter shareholders. Each of those have been secured. Then in early October, Musk made a conditional offer to close the deal this month on the original $54.20 per share terms. Twitter responded, The intention of the Company is to close the transaction at $54.20 per share. The prospects for a price cut appear to have substantially diminished. Following his most recent change of heart, he’s been sounding more positive about Twitter on Twitter and said to the FT that, I’m not doing Twitter for the money. It’s not like I’m trying to buy some yacht and I can’t afford it. I don’t own any boats. But I think it’s important that people have a maximally trusted and inclusive means of exchanging ideas and that it should be as trusted and transparent as possible. As of this writing, there remains a $5.00 net spread between the market price and the original deal price. What Could Go Wrong The reasonably likely downside is for Musk’s erratic behavior to date to continue unabated throughout the course of this month. He can change his mind yet again. He can nuke his financing (indirectly through his irreparable damage to Twitter or directly through additional contact with the banks asking them again to slow or stop the debt financing process). He can fail to line up equity financing. He can refuse to sign or have signed the solvency agreement. He can attempt to pay the oft quoted but rarely understood $1 billion parent termination fee. What Could Go Wrong with What Could Go Wrong The Honorable Chancellor Kathaleen St. J. McCormick (DE C of C) No matter how much chaos Elon Musk creates in October and whether or not he’s able to spread it to Morgan Stanley (MS) and others contractually committed to financing this deal, the chaos will abruptly end at 5 PM Oct. 28, 2022. The brief and pointed stay is worth reading for its substance and tone: DE Court of ChanceryMusk deposition in Twitter case set for end of week
With deadlines closing in on the trial of Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) v. Musk et al., the delayed deposition of Elon Musk is now set to take place on Thursday and Friday. Court filings indicate the private questioning of the billionaire will happen at a law office in Austin, the home of Musk's automaker Tesla. His attorney, Alex Spiro, is set for deposition on Sunday, following his own postponed deposition. Twitter (TWTR) CEO Parag Agrawal was scheduled to be deposed on Monday, after his own deposition was previously postponed - and there's little room for any more delays as more pretrial deadlines arrive. The end of Wednesday brings the deadline for final witness lists for each side. The five-day trial to settle the case is set to begin Oct. 17 in Delaware's Court of Chancery.Recent updates
株主還元
| TWTR | US Interactive Media and Services | US 市場 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7D | 2.4% | 1.6% | 2.2% |
| 1Y | -1.1% | 51.7% | 24.8% |
業界別リターン: TWTR過去 1 年間で51.7 % の収益を上げたUS Interactive Media and Services業界を上回りました。
リターン対市場: TWTR過去 1 年間で24.8 % の収益を上げたUS市場を上回りました。
価格変動
| TWTR volatility | |
|---|---|
| TWTR Average Weekly Movement | 7.7% |
| Interactive Media and Services Industry Average Movement | 8.5% |
| Market Average Movement | 7.2% |
| 10% most volatile stocks in US Market | 16.7% |
| 10% least volatile stocks in US Market | 3.1% |
安定した株価: TWTRの株価は、 US市場と比較して過去 3 か月間で変動しています。
時間の経過による変動: TWTRの 週次ボラティリティ ( 8% ) は過去 1 年間安定しています。
会社概要
| 設立 | 従業員 | CEO(最高経営責任者 | ウェブサイト |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 7,500 | Parag Agrawal | www.twitter.com |
Twitter, Inc. 基礎のまとめ
| TWTR 基礎統計学 | |
|---|---|
| 時価総額 | US$41.03b |
| 収益(TTM) | -US$111.78m |
| 売上高(TTM) | US$5.23b |
TWTR は割高か?
公正価値と評価分析を参照収益と収入
| TWTR 損益計算書(TTM) | |
|---|---|
| 収益 | US$5.23b |
| 売上原価 | US$2.05b |
| 売上総利益 | US$3.18b |
| その他の費用 | US$3.29b |
| 収益 | -US$111.78m |
直近の収益報告
Jun 30, 2022
次回決算日
該当なし
| 一株当たり利益(EPS) | -0.15 |
| グロス・マージン | 60.84% |
| 純利益率 | -2.14% |
| 有利子負債/自己資本比率 | 88.4% |
TWTR の長期的なパフォーマンスは?
過去の実績と比較を見る企業分析と財務データの現状
| データ | 最終更新日(UTC時間) |
|---|---|
| 企業分析 | 2022/10/27 21:06 |
| 終値 | 2022/10/27 00:00 |
| 収益 | 2022/06/30 |
| 年間収益 | 2021/12/31 |
データソース
企業分析に使用したデータはS&P Global Market Intelligence LLC のものです。本レポートを作成するための分析モデルでは、以下のデータを使用しています。データは正規化されているため、ソースが利用可能になるまでに時間がかかる場合があります。
| パッケージ | データ | タイムフレーム | 米国ソース例 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 会社財務 | 10年 |
| |
| アナリストのコンセンサス予想 | +プラス3年 |
|
|
| 市場価格 | 30年 |
| |
| 所有権 | 10年 |
| |
| マネジメント | 10年 |
| |
| 主な進展 | 10年 |
|
* 米国証券を対象とした例であり、非米国証券については、同等の規制書式および情報源を使用。
特に断りのない限り、すべての財務データは1年ごとの期間に基づいていますが、四半期ごとに更新されます。これは、TTM(Trailing Twelve Month)またはLTM(Last Twelve Month)データとして知られています。詳細はこちら。
分析モデルとスノーフレーク
本レポートを生成するために使用した分析モデルの詳細は当社のGithubページでご覧いただけます。また、レポートの使用方法に関するガイドやYoutubeのチュートリアルも掲載しています。
シンプリー・ウォールストリート分析モデルを設計・構築した世界トップクラスのチームについてご紹介します。
業界およびセクターの指標
私たちの業界とセクションの指標は、Simply Wall Stによって6時間ごとに計算されます。
アナリスト筋
Twitter, Inc. 31 これらのアナリストのうち、弊社レポートのインプットとして使用した売上高または利益の予想を提出したのは、 。アナリストの投稿は一日中更新されます。45
| アナリスト | 機関 |
|---|---|
| Richard Kramer | Arete Research Services LLP |
| James Kelleher | Argus Research Company |
| Colin Sebastian | Baird |