View Financial HealthJLM Couture 配当と自社株買い配当金 基準チェック /06JLM Couture配当金を支払った記録がありません。主要情報n/a配当利回りn/aバイバック利回り総株主利回りn/a将来の配当利回りn/a配当成長n/a次回配当支払日n/a配当落ち日n/a一株当たり配当金n/a配当性向n/a最近の配当と自社株買いの更新更新なしすべての更新を表示Recent updatesお知らせ • Apr 19Joinder to Motion for Case Conversion Filed for JLM Couture, Inc.JLJ Bricken LLC joins with Hayley Paige Gutman to file a motion in the US Bankruptcy Court seeking the conversion of JLM Couture, Inc.’s bankruptcy case from Chapter 11 reorganization to Chapter 7 liquidation on April 17, 2024. The reason being the decline of relationships with important retailers and the debtor’s inability to stabilize its cash flows and provide some recovery to creditors making it difficult to consummate a plan of reorganization.お知らせ • Jul 28Court Finds in Favor of JLM Couture - Instagram and Pinterest Accounts Are Business Accounts - Denies Hayley Gutman's Motion in its EntiretyA Manhattan Federal Court held that New York bridal house, JLM Couture, Inc., has established a clear likelihood of success in their lawsuit against former designer, Hayley Gutman, including that the @misshayleypaige Instagram and Pinterest accounts are business accounts for the Hayley Paige brand and thus owned by JLM. The Court held that these accounts, which were created using the Hayley Paige brand name, are the product of JLM's marketing efforts and investments which built the popularity and success of the Hayley Paige brand. Judge Laura Taylor Swain, in 67 pages of decisive rulings found that Ms. Gutman, used JLM's money, resources, and strategies to help the company build the Accounts' image around and for the JLM-owned Hayley Paige brand, and thus, cannot now claim company property as Hayley own. Even more compelling, Judge Swain ruled that the Preliminary Injunction should be modified and bar Ms. Gutman from being identified as a designer of competitive products or using or authorizing others to use Ms. Gutman's role as a designer to promote the sale of any competitive goods, no matter what title she may claim in connection with a new venture or new employment, until August 1, 2027. The ruling does not prevent Ms. Gutman from designing wedding dresses. While Ms. Gutman can work for other brands, neither she nor those brands nor other third parties may identify her as the designer of those wedding dresses, and her role as a designer cannot be used to promote the sales of competitive goods. Separately, and most telling, the Court denied Ms. Gutman's motion, in its entirety, to dissolve the Preliminary Injunction.お知らせ • Mar 06JLM Couture, Inc. Announces Second Circuit Court of Appeals Denies Hayley Paige Gutman's PetitionThe Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in JLM Couture Inc. vs. Hayley Paige Gutman, denied appellant Ms. Gutman's petition to rehear her argument and her petition for a hearing en banc. The Appeals Court Order supports its earlier decision, as well as multiple federal District Court findings, that Ms. Gutman is not entitled to use the Designer Name in trade or commerce and that she breached her clear and unambiguous employment contract and is not entitled to any additional compensation.お知らせ • Jan 26JLM Couture, Inc. Announces Appeals Court Upholds JLM Couture in Contract Dispute with Hayley Paige GutmanJLM Couture, Inc. announced the Second Circuit Court of Appeals strongly affirmed that Hayley Paige Gutman breached her clear and unambiguous employment contract and is not entitled to any additional compensation. The court stated that JLM had no duty to pay Gutman if she did not work. It was Ms. Gutman who resigned and who breached her employment contract, not JLM, the Appeals Court ruled. The Appeals Court also affirmed that JLM was completely within its rights to enforce a noncompete clause in the employment contract. The Court stated that, Gutman provides no reason to question the district court's determination that this Noncompete Agreement was reasonable and fully enforceable in light of her unique role at JLM. They also stated that the District Court was correct in upholding JLM's rights to the brand name and marks in trade and commerce, and decline(d) Gutman's invitation to depart from the plain language of the Contract. In addition, the Court in no way ordered the Instagram account to change hands nor did they determine ownership of the account. They expressly declined to do so. They remanded this issue back down to the District Court as that is the proper procedure.決済の安定と成長配当データの取得安定した配当: JLMCの 1 株当たり配当が過去に安定していたかどうかを判断するにはデータが不十分です。増加する配当: JLMCの配当金が増加しているかどうかを判断するにはデータが不十分です。配当利回り対市場JLM Couture 配当利回り対市場JLMC 配当利回りは市場と比べてどうか？セグメント配当利回り会社 (JLMC)n/a市場下位25% (US)1.4%市場トップ25% (US)4.2%業界平均 (Luxury)2.5%アナリスト予想 (JLMC) (最長3年)n/a注目すべき配当: JLMCは最近配当金を報告していないため、配当金支払者の下位 25% に対して同社の配当利回りを評価することはできません。高配当: JLMCは最近配当金を報告していないため、配当金支払者の上位 25% に対して同社の配当利回りを評価することはできません。株主への利益配当収益カバレッジ: JLMCの 配当性向 を計算して配当金の支払いが利益で賄われているかどうかを判断するにはデータが不十分です。株主配当金キャッシュフローカバレッジ: JLMCが配当金を報告していないため、配当金の持続可能性を計算できません。高配当企業の発掘7D1Y7D1Y7D1YUS 市場の強力な配当支払い企業。View Management企業分析と財務データの現状データ最終更新日（UTC時間）企業分析2026/06/08 09:50終値2026/03/26 00:00収益2021/10/31年間収益2021/10/31データソース企業分析に使用したデータはS&P Global Market Intelligence LLC のものです。本レポートを作成するための分析モデルでは、以下のデータを使用しています。データは正規化されているため、ソースが利用可能になるまでに時間がかかる場合があります。パッケージデータタイムフレーム米国ソース例会社財務10年損益計算書キャッシュ・フロー計算書貸借対照表SECフォーム10-KSECフォーム10-Qアナリストのコンセンサス予想+プラス3年予想財務アナリストの目標株価アナリストリサーチレポートBlue Matrix市場価格30年株価配当、分割、措置ICEマーケットデータSECフォームS-1所有権10年トップ株主インサイダー取引SECフォーム4SECフォーム13Dマネジメント10年リーダーシップ・チーム取締役会SECフォーム10-KSECフォームDEF 14A主な進展10年会社からのお知らせSECフォーム8-K* 米国証券を対象とした例であり、非米国証券については、同等の規制書式および情報源を使用。特に断りのない限り、すべての財務データは1年ごとの期間に基づいていますが、四半期ごとに更新されます。これは、TTM（Trailing Twelve Month）またはLTM（Last Twelve Month）データとして知られています。詳細はこちら。分析モデルとスノーフレーク本レポートを生成するために使用した分析モデルの詳細は当社のGithubページでご覧いただけます。また、レポートの使用方法に関するガイドやYoutubeのチュートリアルも掲載しています。シンプリー・ウォールストリート分析モデルを設計・構築した世界トップクラスのチームについてご紹介します。業界およびセクターの指標私たちの業界とセクションの指標は、Simply Wall Stによって6時間ごとに計算されます。アナリスト筋JLM Couture, Inc. 0 これらのアナリストのうち、弊社レポートのインプットとして使用した売上高または利益の予想を提出したのは、 。アナリストの投稿は一日中更新されます。0
お知らせ • Apr 19Joinder to Motion for Case Conversion Filed for JLM Couture, Inc.JLJ Bricken LLC joins with Hayley Paige Gutman to file a motion in the US Bankruptcy Court seeking the conversion of JLM Couture, Inc.’s bankruptcy case from Chapter 11 reorganization to Chapter 7 liquidation on April 17, 2024. The reason being the decline of relationships with important retailers and the debtor’s inability to stabilize its cash flows and provide some recovery to creditors making it difficult to consummate a plan of reorganization.
お知らせ • Jul 28Court Finds in Favor of JLM Couture - Instagram and Pinterest Accounts Are Business Accounts - Denies Hayley Gutman's Motion in its EntiretyA Manhattan Federal Court held that New York bridal house, JLM Couture, Inc., has established a clear likelihood of success in their lawsuit against former designer, Hayley Gutman, including that the @misshayleypaige Instagram and Pinterest accounts are business accounts for the Hayley Paige brand and thus owned by JLM. The Court held that these accounts, which were created using the Hayley Paige brand name, are the product of JLM's marketing efforts and investments which built the popularity and success of the Hayley Paige brand. Judge Laura Taylor Swain, in 67 pages of decisive rulings found that Ms. Gutman, used JLM's money, resources, and strategies to help the company build the Accounts' image around and for the JLM-owned Hayley Paige brand, and thus, cannot now claim company property as Hayley own. Even more compelling, Judge Swain ruled that the Preliminary Injunction should be modified and bar Ms. Gutman from being identified as a designer of competitive products or using or authorizing others to use Ms. Gutman's role as a designer to promote the sale of any competitive goods, no matter what title she may claim in connection with a new venture or new employment, until August 1, 2027. The ruling does not prevent Ms. Gutman from designing wedding dresses. While Ms. Gutman can work for other brands, neither she nor those brands nor other third parties may identify her as the designer of those wedding dresses, and her role as a designer cannot be used to promote the sales of competitive goods. Separately, and most telling, the Court denied Ms. Gutman's motion, in its entirety, to dissolve the Preliminary Injunction.
お知らせ • Mar 06JLM Couture, Inc. Announces Second Circuit Court of Appeals Denies Hayley Paige Gutman's PetitionThe Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in JLM Couture Inc. vs. Hayley Paige Gutman, denied appellant Ms. Gutman's petition to rehear her argument and her petition for a hearing en banc. The Appeals Court Order supports its earlier decision, as well as multiple federal District Court findings, that Ms. Gutman is not entitled to use the Designer Name in trade or commerce and that she breached her clear and unambiguous employment contract and is not entitled to any additional compensation.
お知らせ • Jan 26JLM Couture, Inc. Announces Appeals Court Upholds JLM Couture in Contract Dispute with Hayley Paige GutmanJLM Couture, Inc. announced the Second Circuit Court of Appeals strongly affirmed that Hayley Paige Gutman breached her clear and unambiguous employment contract and is not entitled to any additional compensation. The court stated that JLM had no duty to pay Gutman if she did not work. It was Ms. Gutman who resigned and who breached her employment contract, not JLM, the Appeals Court ruled. The Appeals Court also affirmed that JLM was completely within its rights to enforce a noncompete clause in the employment contract. The Court stated that, Gutman provides no reason to question the district court's determination that this Noncompete Agreement was reasonable and fully enforceable in light of her unique role at JLM. They also stated that the District Court was correct in upholding JLM's rights to the brand name and marks in trade and commerce, and decline(d) Gutman's invitation to depart from the plain language of the Contract. In addition, the Court in no way ordered the Instagram account to change hands nor did they determine ownership of the account. They expressly declined to do so. They remanded this issue back down to the District Court as that is the proper procedure.