Loading...

California Reforms And Utah Projects Will Unlock Drilling Opportunities

Published
09 Feb 25
Updated
17 Sep 25
AnalystConsensusTarget's Fair Value
US$3.84
1.3% undervalued intrinsic discount
17 Sep
US$3.79
Loading
1Y
-28.9%
7D
0.3%

Author's Valuation

US$3.841.3% undervalued intrinsic discount

AnalystConsensusTarget Fair Value

Last Update17 Sep 25
Fair value Decreased 14%

Analyst price targets for Berry have been revised down from $4.44 to $3.84 as initial optimism over cost synergies and operational alignment from the California Resources acquisition is tempered by concerns over deal valuation and the diminished standalone upside for Berry.


Analyst Commentary


  • Bullish analysts highlight that the announced acquisition of Berry by California Resources is strategically logical given the asset overlap and adjacency in California, supporting operational integration.
  • The transaction is expected to be more than 10% accretive to California Resources’ cash flow per share and free cash flow per share before synergies, strengthening the combined entity's financial profile.
  • There is potential for synergies from the deal to exceed current guidance ($80M-$90M within the first year), given Berry’s cost structure and cash G&A levels.
  • The recent passage and draft of California legislation (SB 237) is anticipated to streamline the permitting process for new wells and reduce legal uncertainty, benefiting both Berry and California Resources operationally.
  • Bearish analysts are cautious, reflected in a downgrade to Hold and a $4 price target for Berry, likely due to deal valuation, relative upside limitations, or uncertainty regarding the acquisition’s impact on Berry’s standalone business.

What's in the News


  • California Resources Corporation agreed to acquire Berry Corporation for approximately $310 million in equity, plus $408 million in assumed net debt, valuing Berry at around $717 million; deal completion expected in Q1 2026, subject to regulatory and shareholder approval.
  • Berry Corporation repurchased no additional shares in Q2 2025, concluding its buyback program with 11,949,247 shares repurchased (15.79%) for $113.73 million.
  • Production guidance for 2025 reaffirmed, with average daily production expected in the range of 24,800 to 26,000 boe/d.
  • Q2 2025 production reported at 23.9 MBoe/d (92% oil), in line with plan but below 25.3 MBoe/d year-over-year.
  • Berry Corporation was dropped from multiple Russell growth indices, including Russell 2000, 2500, 3000, Small Cap, and Microcap Growth benchmarks.

Valuation Changes


Summary of Valuation Changes for Berry

  • The Consensus Analyst Price Target has significantly fallen from $4.44 to $3.84.
  • The Future P/E for Berry has significantly fallen from 19.85x to 17.03x.
  • The Discount Rate for Berry has fallen slightly from 9.39% to 9.08%.

Key Takeaways

  • Easing regulatory constraints and a robust project portfolio position Berry for long-term growth, higher margins, and resilience amid tightening supply.
  • Ongoing operational efficiencies, stable hedging, and disciplined capital management enhance cash flow reliability and financial appeal to investors.
  • Limited geographic focus, mature assets, regulatory risks, and long-term shifts to renewables threaten Berry's margins, growth prospects, and ability to compete with larger peers.

Catalysts

About Berry
    Operates as an independent upstream energy company in the western United States.
What are the underlying business or industry changes driving this perspective?
  • Regulatory progress in California-including approval of the new Kern County oil and gas ordinance, advancements in streamlining EIRs, and additional legislative proposals-could remove longstanding permitting constraints and unlock incremental drilling opportunities, boosting Berry's long-term production outlook and revenue growth.
  • Berry's deep inventory of high-return, low-capital intensity projects in both California and Utah positions the company to capitalize on tightening supply as Tier 1 resources become scarce, potentially supporting higher net margins and stable free cash flow.
  • The company's strong hedge position (71% of 2025 and 63% of 2026 oil production hedged at attractive prices) provides near-term cash flow stability, mitigating downside risk from oil price volatility and supporting more reliable earnings.
  • Operational efficiency gains-including a 20% reduction in drilling costs per foot in Utah, increased use of produced water, and supply chain control-are expected to continue reducing per-barrel costs, directly enhancing future net margins.
  • Berry's consistent debt reduction and capital return strategy (dividends plus debt repayments representing nearly 10% of enterprise value) supports higher earnings per share and has the potential to attract new investor interest as financial health and capital discipline are increasingly rewarded in the sector.

Berry Earnings and Revenue Growth

Berry Future Earnings and Revenue Growth

Assumptions

How have these above catalysts been quantified?
  • Analysts are assuming Berry's revenue will decrease by 2.0% annually over the next 3 years.
  • Analysts assume that profit margins will increase from 0.7% today to 3.5% in 3 years time.
  • Analysts expect earnings to reach $23.1 million (and earnings per share of $0.3) by about September 2028, up from $5.0 million today.
  • In order for the above numbers to justify the analysts price target, the company would need to trade at a PE ratio of 19.9x on those 2028 earnings, down from 48.6x today. This future PE is greater than the current PE for the US Oil and Gas industry at 12.8x.
  • Analysts expect the number of shares outstanding to grow by 0.86% per year for the next 3 years.
  • To value all of this in today's terms, we will use a discount rate of 9.39%, as per the Simply Wall St company report.

Berry Future Earnings Per Share Growth

Berry Future Earnings Per Share Growth

Risks

What could happen that would invalidate this narrative?
  • Berry's heavy operational concentration in California exposes it to heightened regulatory and legislative risk, and although the current environment appears more constructive, future policy shifts toward decarbonization or further legal challenges to permitting could increase compliance costs or restrict drilling, negatively impacting long-term revenue and net margins.
  • The company's asset base is composed largely of mature oil fields, requiring persistent investment in enhanced recovery and maintenance; persistent production decline rates across these assets may lead to rising capital expenditures over time, which can erode free cash flow and earnings.
  • The accelerating long-term shift toward renewable energy, greater adoption of electric vehicles, and evolving efficiency standards may drive a gradual decline in fossil fuel demand, resulting in a secular downtrend in oil prices that could pressure Berry's future revenues and profitability.
  • Even with cost reductions and drilling efficiencies, Berry's limited geographical diversification means it is particularly vulnerable to regional market disruptions, changes in local energy policies, or infrastructure bottlenecks, all of which could dampen growth and suppress earnings.
  • Intensifying industry consolidation may allow larger, better-capitalized oil and gas companies to outcompete smaller, specialized firms like Berry for premium assets or access to capital markets, putting long-term pressure on Berry's ability to sustain competitive net margins and grow shareholder returns.

Valuation

How have all the factors above been brought together to estimate a fair value?
  • The analysts have a consensus price target of $4.44 for Berry based on their expectations of its future earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors. However, there is a degree of disagreement amongst analysts, with the most bullish reporting a price target of $7.0, and the most bearish reporting a price target of just $3.0.
  • In order for you to agree with the analyst's consensus, you'd need to believe that by 2028, revenues will be $659.8 million, earnings will come to $23.1 million, and it would be trading on a PE ratio of 19.9x, assuming you use a discount rate of 9.4%.
  • Given the current share price of $3.15, the analyst price target of $4.44 is 29.1% higher.
  • We always encourage you to reach your own conclusions though. So sense check these analyst numbers against your own assumptions and expectations based on your understanding of the business and what you believe is probable.

How well do narratives help inform your perspective?

Disclaimer

AnalystConsensusTarget is a tool utilizing a Large Language Model (LLM) that ingests data on consensus price targets, forecasted revenue and earnings figures, as well as the transcripts of earnings calls to produce qualitative analysis. The narratives produced by AnalystConsensusTarget are general in nature and are based solely on analyst data and publicly-available material published by the respective companies. These scenarios are not indicative of the company's future performance and are exploratory in nature. Simply Wall St has no position in the company(s) mentioned. Simply Wall St may provide the securities issuer or related entities with website advertising services for a fee, on an arm's length basis. These relationships have no impact on the way we conduct our business, the content we host, or how our content is served to users. The price targets and estimates used are consensus data, and do not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and they do not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Note that AnalystConsensusTarget's analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

Read more narratives