Last Update 20 Dec 25
Fair value Increased 0.28%GD: Marine And Defense Demand Will Drive Multi Year Upside Potential
Analysts have nudged their consolidated price target for General Dynamics higher, reflecting a move toward the Street's recently raised range of about $380 to $400 per share. They cite a solid quarter, growing balance sheet capacity, and expanding defense and technology opportunities.
Analyst Commentary
Bullish analysts argue that the latest round of estimate revisions supports the move toward a higher valuation band, with price targets now converging in the high $300s to $400 range. They point to a combination of strong execution, improving visibility on defense and technology programs, and a more flexible balance sheet as key drivers underpinning the stock's re-rating potential.
Bullish Takeaways
- Bullish analysts highlight the recent earnings performance as evidence that management is executing well against backlog, supporting higher earnings power and justifying multiple expansion toward the upper end of the peer range.
- Growing balance sheet capacity is seen as a strategic asset, enabling increased capital deployment for share repurchases, targeted M and A, or incremental investment in high-margin programs, which could enhance long term shareholder returns.
- Marine led strength in the recent quarter is viewed as a proof point for sustained defense growth, with additional upside expected from Combat and Technology segments as modernization and digitalization priorities accelerate.
- Rising international demand and a policy environment that favors advanced defense and tech capabilities are cited as structural tailwinds that support price targets of around $380 to $400, assuming continued disciplined execution.
Bearish Takeaways
- Bearish analysts remain cautious that much of the recent good news may already be priced in at current levels, limiting near term upside even as fundamentals improve.
- There is concern that execution risk in complex Marine and technology programs, including potential schedule slips or cost pressures, could challenge margin expansion assumptions embedded in higher valuation targets.
- Some skeptics note that increased reliance on defense spending cycles and international orders leaves the outlook exposed to shifts in budget priorities and geopolitical developments that could temper growth expectations.
- A slower than expected ramp in Combat and Technology opportunities, particularly in newer, tech forward initiatives, could lead to estimate revisions if program awards or funding timelines disappoint.
What's in the News
- General Dynamics NASSCO secured a $1.7 billion award to build two additional John Lewis class fleet replenishment oilers, T AO 215 and T AO 216, under its multi ship U.S. Navy contract, expanding long term shipbuilding visibility (Company announcement).
- General Dynamics Electric Boat received a $642 million cost plus fixed fee contract modification for lead yard support, development studies, and design work tied to Virginia class submarine production, reinforcing its role in nuclear submarine programs (Company announcement).
- The Pentagon is urging major missile manufacturers, including General Dynamics, to double or even quadruple missile production. This reflects heightened demand ahead of potential great power conflict scenarios (Wall Street Journal).
- Four Democratic senators sent letters to General Dynamics IT and other Medicaid eligibility contractors over concerns that technology errors and added work requirements could wrongfully push people off Medicaid coverage (KFF Health News).
- General Dynamics was among defense contractors highlighted as the Defense Secretary ordered an urgent gathering of top U.S. military commanders at a Virginia Marine Corps base. This underscored a tense strategic backdrop for defense spending (Washington Post).
Valuation Changes
- The Fair Value Estimate has risen slightly to approximately $381.86 per share from about $380.80, reflecting a modest upward adjustment in long term expectations.
- The Discount Rate has inched higher to about 7.76 percent from roughly 7.75 percent, indicating a marginally higher required return embedded in the valuation model.
- The Revenue Growth Outlook has increased slightly to around 3.86 percent from about 3.76 percent, suggesting a modestly stronger top line trajectory.
- The Net Profit Margin has edged down slightly to roughly 9.13 percent from about 9.20 percent, incorporating a small reduction in long term profitability assumptions.
- The Future P/E has risen slightly to approximately 24.4x from about 24.2x, signaling a minor expansion in the multiple used to value forward earnings.
Key Takeaways
- Record backlog driven by global defense spending and new contracts enhances revenue visibility, especially in Marine, Aerospace, and advanced military programs.
- Accelerated investments in cyber defense, digital modernization, and operational efficiency are fueling growth and supporting margin expansion across critical business segments.
- Ongoing operational, technology, contract, and financial risks could strain margins and earnings growth across General Dynamics' core defense, aerospace, and technology segments.
Catalysts
About General Dynamics- Operates as an aerospace and defense company worldwide.
- Robust multi-year order intake and record backlog-driven largely by increased global defense spending and rising geopolitical instability-provide strong visibility into future revenue growth across key segments, especially Marine and Aerospace.
- Accelerating investment in secure communications, IT modernization, and cyber defense solutions is fueling growth in the Mission Systems and GDIT divisions, aligning with increased government and enterprise focus on digital transformation and cyber resilience, which should support margin and earnings expansion as these mix shifts take hold.
- Expansion of the Electric Boat program and significant new contracts for advanced submarines-supported by higher U.S. Navy funding and industrial base investments-position the Marine Systems segment for sustained sales growth and realization of operating leverage, benefitting both top
- and bottom-line results over the long term.
- Strong demand for Gulfstream's new business jet models (G700 and G800) across multiple regions, coupled with improved delivery cadences and a long-term capacity to ramp up production, suggest potential for higher future revenue and gradual margin improvement as learning curves are traversed and product mix shifts towards higher-margin offerings.
- The company's focused initiatives on operational excellence, supply chain stabilization, and leveraging digital tools throughout its production system are delivering early improvements in productivity and are likely to drive steady net margin and earnings momentum as scale advantages and efficiency gains continue to compound.
General Dynamics Future Earnings and Revenue Growth
Assumptions
How have these above catalysts been quantified?- Analysts are assuming General Dynamics's revenue will grow by 3.6% annually over the next 3 years.
- Analysts assume that profit margins will increase from 8.1% today to 9.1% in 3 years time.
- Analysts expect earnings to reach $5.1 billion (and earnings per share of $19.46) by about September 2028, up from $4.1 billion today. However, there is some disagreement amongst the analysts with the more bearish ones expecting earnings as low as $4.5 billion.
- In order for the above numbers to justify the analysts price target, the company would need to trade at a PE ratio of 20.9x on those 2028 earnings, down from 21.1x today. This future PE is lower than the current PE for the US Aerospace & Defense industry at 34.4x.
- Analysts expect the number of shares outstanding to decline by 2.16% per year for the next 3 years.
- To value all of this in today's terms, we will use a discount rate of 7.88%, as per the Simply Wall St company report.
General Dynamics Future Earnings Per Share Growth
Risks
What could happen that would invalidate this narrative?- General Dynamics' increasing investment and production in legacy platforms like Gulfstream G400/700/800 and Abrams tanks could expose the company to technology obsolescence risk or customer preference shifts toward more advanced/emerging defense and aerospace solutions, potentially leading to higher R&D/capex needs and margin compression.
- Delays and quality issues in the defense supply chain, especially in the Marine segment (e.g., Electric Boat and NASSCO), present ongoing operational risk; while short-term workarounds have been found, sustained supply instability and episodic setbacks (such as floods/rework at NASSCO) could impair throughput, increase costs, and compress net margins.
- The Technologies segment, despite strong investments in AI, cyber, and mission software, is susceptible to contract adjudication delays, cancellations, and inconsistent award activity; a slower pace of contract wins or protest challenges may create unpredictable revenue flows and impact earnings growth.
- Aerospace services and MRO revenue/margins remain volatile, as demonstrated by recent softness in the service businesses and high sensitivity to quarterly mix and volume. Fluctuations in fleet utilization, new aircraft introductions, or changes in after-market demand could lead to unpredictable margin and profit contributions from this division.
- Persistent high net debt ($7.2 billion) and rising interest expenses, in the context of no recent share repurchases and reliance on commercial paper, could reduce financial flexibility, increase vulnerability to changes in interest rates or credit markets, and ultimately weigh on net income and earnings per share.
Valuation
How have all the factors above been brought together to estimate a fair value?- The analysts have a consensus price target of $336.0 for General Dynamics based on their expectations of its future earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors. However, there is a degree of disagreement amongst analysts, with the most bullish reporting a price target of $370.0, and the most bearish reporting a price target of just $280.0.
- In order for you to agree with the analyst's consensus, you'd need to believe that by 2028, revenues will be $55.8 billion, earnings will come to $5.1 billion, and it would be trading on a PE ratio of 20.9x, assuming you use a discount rate of 7.9%.
- Given the current share price of $321.33, the analyst price target of $336.0 is 4.4% higher. The relatively low difference between the current share price and the analyst consensus price target indicates that they believe on average, the company is fairly priced.
- We always encourage you to reach your own conclusions though. So sense check these analyst numbers against your own assumptions and expectations based on your understanding of the business and what you believe is probable.
Have other thoughts on General Dynamics?
Create your own narrative on this stock, and estimate its Fair Value using our Valuator tool.
Create NarrativeHow well do narratives help inform your perspective?
Disclaimer
AnalystConsensusTarget is a tool utilizing a Large Language Model (LLM) that ingests data on consensus price targets, forecasted revenue and earnings figures, as well as the transcripts of earnings calls to produce qualitative analysis. The narratives produced by AnalystConsensusTarget are general in nature and are based solely on analyst data and publicly-available material published by the respective companies. These scenarios are not indicative of the company's future performance and are exploratory in nature. Simply Wall St has no position in the company(s) mentioned. Simply Wall St may provide the securities issuer or related entities with website advertising services for a fee, on an arm's length basis. These relationships have no impact on the way we conduct our business, the content we host, or how our content is served to users. The price targets and estimates used are consensus data, and do not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and they do not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Note that AnalystConsensusTarget's analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

