DRA Global Past Earnings Performance
Past criteria checks 3/6
DRA Global has been growing earnings at an average annual rate of 6.7%, while the Construction industry saw earnings growing at 3.7% annually. Revenues have been declining at an average rate of 3.1% per year. DRA Global's return on equity is 8.2%, and it has net margins of 2.2%.
Key information
6.7%
Earnings growth rate
10.1%
EPS growth rate
| Construction Industry Growth | 8.1% |
| Revenue growth rate | -3.1% |
| Return on equity | 8.2% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% |
| Last Earnings Update | 31 Dec 2023 |
Recent past performance updates
Recent updates
Revenue & Expenses BreakdownBeta
How DRA Global makes and spends money. Based on latest reported earnings, on an LTM basis.
Earnings and Revenue History
| Date | Revenue | Earnings | G+A Expenses | R&D Expenses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Dec 23 | 885 | 20 | 171 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 23 | 864 | 17 | 165 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 23 | 842 | 14 | 159 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 23 | 868 | -4 | 155 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 22 | 895 | -22 | 151 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 22 | 994 | -2 | 158 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 22 | 1,094 | 17 | 165 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 22 | 1,140 | 33 | 165 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 21 | 1,186 | 50 | 165 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 21 | 1,131 | 38 | 161 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 21 | 1,075 | 25 | 157 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 21 | 1,007 | 24 | 160 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 20 | 938 | 23 | 162 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 19 | 1,033 | 36 | 148 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 18 | 957 | -42 | 83 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 17 | 641 | 25 | 78 | 0 |
Quality Earnings: DRA has high quality earnings.
Growing Profit Margin: DRA became profitable in the past.
Free Cash Flow vs Earnings Analysis
Past Earnings Growth Analysis
Earnings Trend: DRA has become profitable over the past 5 years, growing earnings by 6.7% per year.
Accelerating Growth: DRA has become profitable in the last year, making the earnings growth rate difficult to compare to its 5-year average.
Earnings vs Industry: DRA has become profitable in the last year, making it difficult to compare its past year earnings growth to the Construction industry (16%).
Return on Equity
High ROE: DRA's Return on Equity (8.2%) is considered low.