Streamex Management
Management criteria checks 1/4
Streamex's CEO is Karl McPhie, appointed in Sep 2023, has a tenure of 2.67 years. directly owns 0.026% of the company’s shares, worth $60.84K. The average tenure of the management team and the board of directors is 1 years and 0.8 years respectively.
Key information
Karl McPhie
Chief executive officer
US$101.4k
Total compensation
| CEO salary percentage | n/a |
| CEO tenure | 2.7yrs |
| CEO ownership | 0.03% |
| Management average tenure | 1yr |
| Board average tenure | less than a year |
Recent management updates
Recent updates
New Narrative • Apr 09
Tokenized Commodity Yield Platform Will Benefit From Growing Real World Asset Adoption
Catalysts About Streamex Streamex operates a capital light platform focused on tokenized commodity assets such as yield bearing gold and planned silver, copper and energy linked products. What are the underlying business or industry changes driving this perspective?Analysis Article • Dec 12
Shareholders May Be More Conservative With BioSig Technologies, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BSGM) CEO Compensation For Now
Key Insights BioSig Technologies will host its Annual General Meeting on 18th of December Salary of US$865.7k is part...Analysis Article • Dec 14
Shareholders May Not Be So Generous With BioSig Technologies, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BSGM) CEO Compensation And Here's Why
Shareholders of BioSig Technologies, Inc. ( NASDAQ:BSGM ) will have been dismayed by the negative share price return...Seeking Alpha • Oct 07
BioSig in acquisition pact with San Antonio Hospital for cardiac signal system
Medical device maker BioSig Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:BSGM) announced that the company entered into a purchase agreement with San Antonio Methodist Hospital allowing the latter to acquire its PURE EP System, a cardiac signal processing system. According to a regulatory filing on Thursday, the company executed the deal on Sep. 30 In July, BSGM announced a leasing deal under which the Overland Park Regional Medical Center agreed to acquire the PURE EP System, marking the first transaction since its nationwide launch. "Establishing a contract with a leading national hospital network is a milestone achievement for BioSig Technologies," BSGM Chief Commercial Officer Gray Fleming said at the time. "A leasing option provides a cost-effective and efficient pathway for hospitals to acquire our technology," he added.Seeking Alpha • Sep 08
BioSig: No Changes To Hold Thesis Following Q2 Earnings
Summary BioSig continues to be presented with systematic challenges that place it behind other selective opportunities in med-tech. Cash flows are priced out well into the future and the predictability of these is low in the current landscape. We note updates around PURE EP continue to receive a muted market reaction upon release. Here we reiterate the hold rating on BSGM. From the Portfolio Manager's Desk Unprofitable med-tech continues to face systematic headwinds as the market looks to match mispricings in fundamentals to future expectations. However, risk-assets have caught a bid since June and that's meant high-beta names have clawed back some of the losses incurred in FY22. We've made no changes to our thesis on BioSig Technologies, Inc. (BSGM) from my previous analysis in June. We also covered BioSig in late 2020. We encourage investors to factor a data driven approach in this name until there is some fundamental value to be derived. Investment Summary We reiterate a hold rating on BSGM following Q2 earnings as systematic headwinds remain for this name. We note the stock has caught a bid since the June bounce however we argue this is likely beta related rather than some unidentified or uncorrelated premia BSGM is presenting relative to peers. With cash flows still priced well out into the future, BSGM is one to be watched from the sidelines from now for a defensively positioned equity portfolio. Rate hold on a $1 valuation. Risks to investment thesis Investing in small-cap equities comes with inherent risks that must be factored in before investment decision. Moreover, investing in commercial stage medical device companies carries its own set of downside risks. Being a neutral stance, there is both upside and downside risks to our investment thesis. In addition, small-cap equities can become disconnected from fundamentals upon news releases or wider market actions and display wide volatility in price swings. These risks pose a threat to this investment thesis and must be considered heavily into one's investment reasoning when reading this analysis. Recent upside likely beta related Quantitative analysis of recent stock returns points to the fact the upside is likely due to equity market and sector-beta rather than company-specific risk premia. As seen in Exhibit 1, since the leg upward from the July bounce, BSGM's equity beta to the S&P/500 also shifted well above 1 and has remained buoyant since. This tells us that investors are buyers of BGSM in seeking strategic equity/health care exposure, versus tactical positioning from active managers/investors. Exhibit 1. Up-shift in covariance structure accompanying the latest leg in the BGSM share price suggesting recent upside is likely equity beta versus idiosyncratic risk/return Data: Updata Further evidence of the above is seen in Exhibit 2. As noted, health care as an investment universe has caught a bid since the June bounce along with positioning in risk-assets. However, we note that BSGM's correlation to the medical devices and health care index equipment has also shifted up since May. As a result, we question if the recent upside is a function of certain investors having identified in BGSM that the market consensus has overlooked, or, just a function of sector-beta, as mentioned. We are leaning towards the latter. Exhibit 2. Correlations to med-tech and health care benchmarks also lifting since early May raising questions on where we can attribute the source of recent equity returns from in BGSM Both charts [above and below] demonstrate a tight dispersion between equity market and sector beta and the BGSM share price since it began to tick up in August Data: Updata Pure EP updates still priced in As has been the case with BSGM, the growth engine centres around PURE EP and updates around the same. However, as has also been the case this year, investors have priced in additional updates quickly and with little amplitude. Most recently on 24 August it reported that it had installed a second evaluation system at the Cleveland Clinic, expanding physician access to the company's 'signal' technology. However, the market's reaction was mute, as has been the case previously. In particular, we note the market's muted reaction to the news BSGM will reduce product evaluations down to 60 days from 180-360 days. However, there's still no revenue booked for the segment, in preparation for the commercial rollout. We mentioned in June that, "BSGM likely has revenue tailwinds set to be realised in H2 FY22, with a ramp up in sales predicted into the coming years pending a successful launch." This likely has been overshot and we now look to Q4 to see some form of how the company intends to proceed with its sales strategy looking ahead. The question then turns to what exactly are we paying for today in BSGM. Shares are priced at more than 7.1x book value, on shareholder equity of $6.8mm and book value per share of $0.15. It's also priced at 6.6x enterprise value ("EV") to book value. At this multiple we'd be paying an implied price of $1.00, suggesting the market consensus has the stock fairly discounted at its current market capitalization. Moreover, and looking at the balance sheet, we're buying into a capital structure that is weighted towards equity holders, with $596mm in tangible assets and $317mm in patents that it amortizes on a straight-line basis over 20 years. However, we're not buying into any substantiated return on any of this capital investment, and we are set to pay what looks like fair value for cash flows priced well out into the future. This degree of uncertainty keeps us trigger shy on the name. Technical factors With a lack of fundamental data, we checked the market's psychology around the stock and noted there remains a downside bias in price action. As seen in Exhibit 3, there are downside targets clustered towards the $0.85-$0.92 region. The stock has set a series of lower highs and is again testing the inner resistance line shown below. From this chart, price action appears to be bearish, and unsupportive of near-term upside.CEO
Karl McPhie (24 yo)
2.7yrs
Tenure
US$101,366
Compensation
Mr. Karl Henry McPhie is Co-Founder, CEO & Director of Streamex Corp. from May 28, 2025 He Has a depth of experience at the intersection of blockchain technology and financial innovation. From 2021 to 2023...
Leadership Team
| Name | Position | Tenure | Compensation | Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co-Founder & Interim Executive Chairman | 2.7yrs | US$82.24k | 0.14% $ 319.7k | |
| Co-Founder | 2.7yrs | US$101.37k | 0.026% $ 60.8k | |
| Chief Investment Officer | 1yr | US$5.55m | 1.08% $ 2.5m | |
| CFO and Principal Accounting & Financial Officer | less than a year | no data | 0.018% $ 42.1k | |
| Chief Administrative Officer | no data | US$96.00k | no data | |
| Senior Vice President of Investor Relations | no data | no data | no data | |
| General Counsel | no data | no data | no data | |
| Head of BD & Partnerships | no data | no data | no data | |
| Head of Product | no data | no data | no data | |
| Head of Engineering | no data | no data | no data |
1.0yrs
Average Tenure
52yo
Average Age
Experienced Management: STEX's management team is not considered experienced ( 1 years average tenure), which suggests a new team.
Board Members
| Name | Position | Tenure | Compensation | Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co-Founder & Interim Executive Chairman | 2.7yrs | US$82.24k | 0.14% $ 319.7k | |
| Co-Founder | 1yr | US$101.37k | 0.026% $ 60.8k | |
| Member of Advisory Board | no data | no data | 1.31% $ 3.0m | |
| Member of Advisory Board | no data | no data | no data | |
| Independent Director | less than a year | no data | 0.10% $ 237.3k | |
| Independent Director | less than a year | US$13.44k | 0.10% $ 237.3k | |
| Member of Advisory Board | no data | no data | no data | |
| Member of Advisory Board | no data | no data | no data | |
| Independent Director | 2yrs | US$575.87k | 0.23% $ 541.8k | |
| Member of Advisory Board | no data | no data | no data | |
| Independent Director | less than a year | no data | 0.12% $ 279.4k |
0.8yrs
Average Tenure
59.5yo
Average Age
Experienced Board: STEX's board of directors are not considered experienced ( 0.8 years average tenure), which suggests a new board.
Company Analysis and Financial Data Status
| Data | Last Updated (UTC time) |
|---|---|
| Company Analysis | 2026/05/26 07:00 |
| End of Day Share Price | 2026/05/26 00:00 |
| Earnings | 2026/03/31 |
| Annual Earnings | 2025/12/31 |
Data Sources
The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.
| Package | Data | Timeframe | Example US Source * |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Financials | 10 years |
| |
| Analyst Consensus Estimates | +3 years |
|
|
| Market Prices | 30 years |
| |
| Ownership | 10 years |
| |
| Management | 10 years |
| |
| Key Developments | 10 years |
|
* Example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.
Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more.
Analysis Model and Snowflake
Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.
Learn about the world class team who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.
Industry and Sector Metrics
Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on Github.
Analyst Sources
Streamex Corp. is covered by 2 analysts. 1 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.
| Analyst | Institution |
|---|---|
| John Todaro | Needham & Company |
| Scott Henry | Roth Capital Partners |