PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Past Earnings Performance
Past criteria checks 1/6
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's earnings have been declining at an average annual rate of -24.8%, while the Capital Markets industry saw earnings growing at 9.7% annually. Revenues have been declining at an average rate of 8.7% per year. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's return on equity is 13.6%, and it has net margins of 104%.
Key information
-24.8%
Earnings growth rate
-25.2%
EPS growth rate
| Capital Markets Industry Growth | 10.3% |
| Revenue growth rate | -8.7% |
| Return on equity | 13.6% |
| Net Margin | 104.0% |
| Last Earnings Update | 31 Dec 2023 |
Recent past performance updates
No updates
Recent updates
RCS: A Decent Bond Fund, But Best To Wait For A Better Entry Price Given Risks
Dec 28RCS: Safest Underlying Securities, But Not A Safe Fund
Oct 22RCS: Far Too Expensive To Justify A Purchase
Sep 12RCS: No Reason For An Upgrade In The Second Half Of The Year
May 31PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
Feb 09PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
Jan 04PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
Dec 08PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
Nov 04PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
Oct 03PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
Sep 02RCS: Despite Flat Return, Value Proposition Is Much Worse
Aug 14PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
Aug 02RCS: 1 Of PIMCO's Poorest-Performing Income CEFs
Jun 13RCS: It Has Dropped Almost 20%, And It's Still Not Cheap
Mar 04RCS: I Still Can't Be Tempted
Nov 03RCS: Changing Make-Up, High Premium, Still A Mixed Case
Jul 01PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
May 07PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
Jan 04PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
Dec 02PIMCO Strategic Income Fund declares $0.051 dividend
Nov 04Revenue & Expenses BreakdownBeta
How PIMCO Strategic Income Fund makes and spends money. Based on latest reported earnings, on an LTM basis.
Earnings and Revenue History
| Date | Revenue | Earnings | G+A Expenses | R&D Expenses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Dec 23 | 26 | 27 | 2 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 23 | 26 | 19 | 2 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 23 | 26 | 11 | 2 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 23 | 28 | -22 | 2 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 22 | 30 | -54 | 2 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 22 | 31 | -55 | 2 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 22 | 31 | -57 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 22 | 29 | -24 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 21 | 27 | 9 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 21 | 28 | 31 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 21 | 29 | 54 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 21 | 31 | 34 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 20 | 33 | 14 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 20 | 36 | -3 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 20 | 40 | -20 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 20 | 39 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 19 | 38 | 33 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 19 | 37 | 30 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 19 | 36 | 26 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 19 | 38 | 14 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 18 | 39 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 18 | 39 | 10 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 18 | 39 | 18 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 18 | 38 | 29 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 17 | 38 | 39 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 17 | 36 | 36 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 17 | 34 | 33 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 17 | 35 | 29 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 16 | 36 | 24 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 16 | 36 | 19 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 16 | 36 | 13 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 15 | 34 | 40 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 15 | 42 | 14 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 14 | 43 | 25 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 14 | 44 | 36 | 4 | 0 |
| 30 Apr 14 | 45 | 32 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 14 | 46 | 28 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 13 | 45 | 39 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 13 | 45 | 50 | 4 | 0 |
Quality Earnings: RCS has a large one-off gain of $9.1M impacting its last 12 months of financial results to 31st December, 2023.
Growing Profit Margin: RCS became profitable in the past.
Free Cash Flow vs Earnings Analysis
Past Earnings Growth Analysis
Earnings Trend: RCS's earnings have declined by 24.8% per year over the past 5 years.
Accelerating Growth: RCS has become profitable in the last year, making the earnings growth rate difficult to compare to its 5-year average.
Earnings vs Industry: RCS has become profitable in the last year, making it difficult to compare its past year earnings growth to the Capital Markets industry (3.3%).
Return on Equity
High ROE: RCS's Return on Equity (13.6%) is considered low.