PIMCO Income Strategy Fund Past Earnings Performance
Past criteria checks 3/6
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund has been growing earnings at an average annual rate of 1.8%, while the Capital Markets industry saw earnings growing at 9.7% annually. Revenues have been growing at an average rate of 7.4% per year. PIMCO Income Strategy Fund's return on equity is 12.2%, and it has net margins of 88.2%.
Key information
1.8%
Earnings growth rate
6.4%
EPS growth rate
| Capital Markets Industry Growth | 10.3% |
| Revenue growth rate | 7.4% |
| Return on equity | 12.2% |
| Net Margin | 88.2% |
| Last Earnings Update | 31 Dec 2023 |
Recent past performance updates
No updates
Recent updates
PFL: After A Big Run, I'd Be More Cautious Here (Rating Downgrade)
Mar 21PFL: Market Appears Exuberant, So Caution Could Be Advisable
Dec 05PFL: Good Bond CEF But Bond Bear Market Is A Big Risk
Sep 28PFL: A Solid Bond CEF For Income, But It Isn't Cheap
Jul 24PIMCO Income Strategy Fund declares $0.0814 dividend
Feb 09PIMCO Income Strategy Fund declares $0.0814 dividend
Jan 04PFL: This Very High Yielding Bond Fund May Be Worth Buying Today
Dec 13PIMCO Income Strategy Fund declares $0.0814 dividend
Nov 04PIMCO Income Strategy Fund declares $0.0814 dividend
Oct 03PTY & PFL: Looking For Yields In All The Wrong Places
Sep 19PIMCO Income Strategy Fund declares $0.0814 dividend
Sep 02PIMCO Income Strategy Fund declares $0.0814 dividend
Aug 02PFL And PTY: We Are Entering The Final Meltdown Phase
Jun 12PTY, PFL, And PFN: Listen To Your Chart
Apr 09PTY, PFL, And PFN: Are We Panicking Yet?
Jan 24PTY, PFL, And PFN: Are We There Yet?
Dec 03PIMCO Closed-End Funds: To Soon To Buy
Sep 14PTY, PFL And PFN: It Is Only A Flesh Wound, So Far
Sep 03PFL & PTY: Abysmal Setups
Jul 08PIMCO Income Strategy Fund declares $0.09 dividend
May 07PIMCO Income Strategy Fund - High Return For High Risk
Dec 23PIMCO Income Strategy Fund declares $0.09 dividend
Dec 02PIMCO Income Strategy Fund declares $0.09 dividend
Nov 04Revenue & Expenses BreakdownBeta
How PIMCO Income Strategy Fund makes and spends money. Based on latest reported earnings, on an LTM basis.
Earnings and Revenue History
| Date | Revenue | Earnings | G+A Expenses | R&D Expenses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Dec 23 | 41 | 36 | 4 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 23 | 41 | 24 | 4 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 23 | 40 | 12 | 4 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 22 | 34 | -54 | 5 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 22 | 34 | 16 | 5 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 21 | 35 | 44 | 5 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 21 | 35 | 72 | 5 | 0 |
| 30 Apr 21 | 35 | 48 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 21 | 35 | 23 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 20 | 35 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 20 | 35 | -17 | 4 | 0 |
| 30 Apr 20 | 33 | 9 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 20 | 32 | 35 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 19 | 30 | 29 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 19 | 29 | 23 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Apr 19 | 28 | 15 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 19 | 27 | 7 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 18 | 27 | 11 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 18 | 26 | 16 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Apr 18 | 27 | 28 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 18 | 27 | 40 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 17 | 26 | 47 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 17 | 26 | 55 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Apr 17 | 27 | 52 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 17 | 27 | 50 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 16 | 26 | 27 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 16 | 25 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 Apr 16 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 16 | 22 | -3 | 3 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 15 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 15 | 24 | 11 | 4 | 0 |
| 30 Apr 15 | 24 | 12 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 15 | 25 | 14 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 14 | 24 | 26 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 14 | 23 | 39 | 4 | 0 |
| 30 Apr 14 | 24 | 28 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jan 14 | 24 | 16 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 13 | 25 | 30 | 4 | 0 |
| 31 Jul 13 | 27 | 44 | 4 | 0 |
Quality Earnings: PFL has high quality earnings.
Growing Profit Margin: PFL became profitable in the past.
Free Cash Flow vs Earnings Analysis
Past Earnings Growth Analysis
Earnings Trend: PFL's earnings have grown by 1.8% per year over the past 5 years.
Accelerating Growth: PFL has become profitable in the last year, making the earnings growth rate difficult to compare to its 5-year average.
Earnings vs Industry: PFL has become profitable in the last year, making it difficult to compare its past year earnings growth to the Capital Markets industry (3.3%).
Return on Equity
High ROE: PFL's Return on Equity (12.2%) is considered low.