GTX
- Home ›
- US ›
- Consumer Durables
GTX Corp, through its subsidiaries, designs, develops, and sells various products and services in the personal location services marketplace in the United States and internationally. The last earnings update was 2 days ago. More info.
Add to Portfolio Compare Print
- GTX has significant price volatility in the past 3 months.
GTXO Share Price and Events
7 Day Returns
1 Year Returns
GTXO Shareholder Return
| 7 Day | 30 Day | 90 Day | 1 Year | 3 Year | 5 Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTX (GTXO) | 0% | -44.2% | -39.9% | -94.8% | -98.5% | -99.4% |
| US Consumer Durables | 1.3% | 0.4% | 4.3% | -0.1% | 40.9% | 28.8% |
| US Market | 1.6% | -1.7% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 38.5% | 41.4% |
1 Year Return vs Industry and Market
- GTXO underperformed the Consumer Durables industry which returned -0.1% over the past year.
- GTXO underperformed the Market in United States of America which returned 2.6% over the past year.
Price Volatility
Related Companies
GTXO Value
Is GTX undervalued based on future cash flows and its price relative to the stock market?
Value is all about what a company is worth versus what price it is
available for. If you went into a grocery store and all the bananas were on sale
at half price, they could be considered
undervalued.
In this section, we usually try to help investors determine whether GTX is trading at an attractive price based on the cash flow it is expected to produce in the future. But as GTX has not provided consistent financial data, and the stock also has no analyst forecast or coverage, its intrinsic value cannot be reliably calculated by extrapolating past data or using analyst consensus cash flow predictions.
This is quite a rare situation as 89% of companies covered by Simply Wall St do have a valuation analysis. You can see them here.
Show me the analysis anyway
- It is not possible to calculate the future cash flow value for GTX. This is due to cash flow or dividend data being unavailable. The share price is $0.011.
PRICE RELATIVE TO MARKET
We can also value a company based on what the stock market is willing to pay for
it. This is similar to the price of fruit (e.g. Mangoes or Avocados) increasing
when they are out of season, or how much your home is worth.The amount the stock market is willing to pay for GTX's earnings, growth and assets is considered below, and whether this is a fair price.
Price based on past earnings
Are
GTX's earnings available for a low price, and how does
this compare to other companies in the same industry?
| Data Point | Source | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Earnings Per Share * | Company Filings (2019-03-31) in USD | $-0.05 |
| OTCPK:GTXO Share Price ** | OTCPK (2019-05-21) in USD | $0.01 |
| United States of America Consumer Durables Industry PE Ratio | Median Figure of 51 Publicly-Listed Consumer Durables Companies | 14.64x |
| United States of America Market PE Ratio | Median Figure of 3,087 Publicly-Listed Companies | 17.74x |
* Trailing twelve months (TTM) annual GAAP earnings per share excluding extraordinary items.
** Primary Listing of GTX.
| Calculation | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|
| PE Ratio | = OTCPK:GTXO Share Price ÷ EPS (both in USD) = 0.01 ÷ -0.05 |
-0.2x |
Learn more about our ratios and growth rates in Simply Wall St’s analysis model >
- GTX is loss making, we can't compare its value to the US Consumer Durables industry average.
- GTX is loss making, we can't compare the value of its earnings to the United States of America market.
Price based on expected Growth
Does
GTX's expected growth come at a high price?
| Data Point | Source | Value |
|---|---|---|
| PE Ratio | See PE Ratio Section | -0.2x |
| Net Income Annual Growth Rate | See Future Growth Section. Line of Best Fit* through Consensus Estimate Earnings of 0 Analysts |
Not available |
| United States of America Consumer Durables Industry PEG Ratio | Median Figure of 37 Publicly-Listed Consumer Durables Companies | 1.18x |
| United States of America Market PEG Ratio | Median Figure of 2,123 Publicly-Listed Companies | 1.53x |
*Line of best fit is calculated by linear regression .
Learn more about our ratios and growth rates in Simply Wall St’s analysis model >
- Unable to calculate PEG ratio for GTX, we can't assess if its growth is good value.
Price based on value of assets
What value do investors place on
GTX's
assets?
| Data Point | Source | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Book Value per Share | Company Filings (2019-03-31) in USD | $-0.05 |
| OTCPK:GTXO Share Price * | OTCPK (2019-05-21) in USD | $0.01 |
| United States of America Consumer Durables Industry PB Ratio | Median Figure of 69 Publicly-Listed Consumer Durables Companies | 1.33x |
| United States of America Market PB Ratio | Median Figure of 5,202 Publicly-Listed Companies | 1.84x |
| Calculation | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|
| PB Ratio | = OTCPK:GTXO Share Price ÷ Book Value per Share (both in USD) = 0.01 ÷ -0.05 |
-0.24x |
* Primary Listing of GTX.
Learn more about our ratios and growth rates in Simply Wall St’s analysis model >
- GTX has negative assets, we can't compare the value of its assets to the US Consumer Durables industry average.
Value checks
We assess GTX's value by looking at:- Is the discounted cash flow value less than 20%, or 40% of the share price? (2 checks) ( Click here or on bar chart for details of DCF calculation. )
- Is the PE ratio less than the market average, and/ or less than the Consumer Durables industry average (and greater than 0)? (2 checks)
- Is the PEG ratio within a reasonable range (0 to 1)? (1 check)
- Is the PB ratio less than the Consumer Durables industry average (and greater than 0)? (1 check) GTX has a total score of 0/6, see the detailed checks below.
Note: We use GAAP Earnings per Share in all our calculations including PE and PEG Ratio.
Full details on the Value part of the Simply Wall St company analysis model.
GTXO Future Performance
How is GTX expected to perform in the next 1 to 3 years based on estimates from 0 analysts?
In this section we usually present revenue and earnings growth projections based on the consensus estimates of professional analysts to help investors understand the company’s ability to generate profit. But as GTX has not provided enough past data and has no analyst forecast, its future earnings cannot be reliably calculated by extrapolating past data or using analyst predictions.
This is quite a rare situation as 97% of companies covered by Simply Wall St do have past financial data. You can see them here.
Show me the analysis anyway
The future performance of a company is measured in the same way as past
performance, by looking at estimated
growth
and how much profit it is expected to make.Future estimates come from professional analysts. Just like forecasting the weather, they don’t always get it right!
Earnings growth vs Low Risk Savings
- Unable to compare GTX's earnings growth to the low risk savings rate as no estimate data is available.
Growth vs Market Checks
- Unable to compare GTX's earnings growth to the United States of America market average as no estimate data is available.
- Unable to compare GTX's revenue growth to the United States of America market average as no estimate data is available.
Annual Growth Rates Comparison
| Data Point | Source | Value (per year) |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America Consumer Durables Industry Earnings Growth Rate | Market Cap Weighted Average | 17.6% |
| United States of America Consumer Durables Industry Revenue Growth Rate | Market Cap Weighted Average | 5.8% |
| United States of America Market Earnings Growth Rate | Market Cap Weighted Average | 13.8% |
| United States of America Market Revenue Growth Rate | Market Cap Weighted Average | 7.3% |
*Line of best fit is calculated by linear regression .
Industry and Market average data is calculated daily.
Learn more about our growth rate calculations in Simply Wall St’s analysis model.
Analysts growth expectations
| Data Point | Source | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Past Financials | Company Filings (1 month ago) | See Below |
| Future Estimates | Average of up to 0 Analyst Estimates (S&P Global) | See Below |
| Date (Data in USD Millions) | Revenue | Cash Flow | Net Income * |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | 1 | 0 | -2 |
| 2018-12-31 | 1 | 0 | -2 |
| 2018-09-30 | 1 | -1 | -2 |
| 2018-06-30 | 1 | -1 | -2 |
| 2018-03-31 | 1 | -1 | -1 |
| 2017-12-31 | 1 | -1 | -1 |
| 2017-09-30 | 1 | 0 | -1 |
| 2017-06-30 | 1 | -1 | -1 |
| 2017-03-31 | 1 | 0 | -1 |
| 2016-12-31 | 1 | 0 | -1 |
| 2016-09-30 | 1 | -1 | -1 |
| 2016-06-30 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
*GAAP earnings excluding extraordinary items.
Past and Future Earnings per Share
| Data Point | Source | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Past Financials | Company Filings (1 month ago) | See Below |
| Future Estimates | Average of up to 0 Analyst Estimates (S&P Global) | See Below |
All data from GTX Company Filings, last reported 1 month ago, and in Trailing twelve months (TTM) annual period rather than quarterly.
| Date (Data in USD Millions) | EPS * |
|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | -0.05 |
| 2018-12-31 | -0.08 |
| 2018-09-30 | -0.15 |
| 2018-06-30 | -0.19 |
| 2018-03-31 | -0.11 |
| 2017-12-31 | -0.15 |
| 2017-09-30 | -0.18 |
| 2017-06-30 | -0.16 |
| 2017-03-31 | -0.24 |
| 2016-12-31 | -0.22 |
| 2016-09-30 | -0.24 |
| 2016-06-30 | -0.27 |
*GAAP earnings excluding extraordinary items.
Future performance checks
We assess GTX's future performance by looking at:- Is the annual earnings growth rate expected to beat the low risk savings rate, plus a premium to keep pace with inflation?
- Is the annual earnings growth rate expected to beat the average growth rate in earnings of the United States of America market? (1 check)
- Is the annual revenue growth rate expected to beat the average growth rate in revenue of the United States of America market? (1 check)
- Is the annual earnings growth rate expected to be above 20%? (1 check)
- Is the annual revenue growth rate expected to be above 20%? (1 check)
- Is the Return on Equity in 3 years expected to be over 20%? (1 check)
GTX has a total score of 0/6, see the detailed checks below.
Note 1: We use GAAP Net Income Excluding Exceptional Items for our Earnings in all our calculations.
Full details on the Future part of the Simply Wall St company analysis model.
GTXO Past Performance
How has GTX performed over the past 5 years?
The past performance of a company can be measured by how much
growth
it has experienced and how much profit it makes relative to the funds and assets
it has available.
Past earnings growth
Past Earnings growth analysis
- GTX does not make a profit even though their year on year earnings growth rate was positive over the past 5 years.
- Unable to compare GTX's 1-year earnings growth to the 5-year average as it is not currently profitable.
- Unable to compare GTX's 1-year growth to the US Consumer Durables industry average as it is not currently profitable.
Earnings and Revenue History
All data from GTX Company Filings, last reported 1 month ago, and in Trailing twelve months (TTM) annual period rather than quarterly.
| Date (Data in USD Millions) | Revenue | Net Income * | G+A Expenses | R&D Expenses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | 0.54 | -2.00 | 1.62 | 0.00 |
| 2018-12-31 | 0.69 | -1.76 | 1.47 | |
| 2018-09-30 | 0.68 | -1.59 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| 2018-06-30 | 0.61 | -1.78 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| 2018-03-31 | 0.65 | -1.02 | 1.28 | |
| 2017-12-31 | 0.54 | -1.27 | 1.31 | |
| 2017-09-30 | 0.66 | -1.34 | 1.34 | |
| 2017-06-30 | 0.72 | -1.11 | 1.36 | |
| 2017-03-31 | 0.76 | -1.49 | 1.30 | |
| 2016-12-31 | 0.70 | -1.22 | 1.28 | |
| 2016-09-30 | 0.56 | -1.20 | 1.33 | |
| 2016-06-30 | 0.44 | -1.29 | 1.40 | |
| 2016-03-31 | 0.39 | -1.27 | 1.46 | |
| 2015-12-31 | 0.45 | -1.28 | 1.44 | |
| 2015-09-30 | 0.43 | -1.09 | 1.25 | |
| 2015-06-30 | 0.36 | -1.20 | 1.13 | |
| 2015-03-31 | 0.26 | -0.34 | 1.06 | |
| 2014-12-31 | 0.14 | -1.80 | 1.04 | |
| 2014-09-30 | 0.13 | -1.99 | 1.06 | |
| 2014-06-30 | 0.11 | -2.20 | 1.03 | |
| 2014-03-31 | 0.13 | -3.03 | 1.04 | |
| 2013-12-31 | 0.15 | -1.50 | 0.98 | |
| 2013-09-30 | 0.18 | -1.34 | 0.96 | |
| 2013-06-30 | 0.20 | -1.02 | 1.02 | |
| 2013-03-31 | 0.19 | -1.13 | 1.07 | |
| 2012-12-31 | 0.37 | -1.22 | 1.19 | |
| 2012-09-30 | 0.35 | -1.30 | 1.27 | |
| 2012-06-30 | 0.67 | -1.39 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
*GAAP earnings excluding extraordinary items.
Performance last year
We want to ensure a company is making the most of what it has available. This is
done by comparing the return (profit) to a company's available
funds,
assets
and
capital.
- It is difficult to establish if GTX has efficiently used shareholders’ funds last year (Return on Equity greater than 20%) due to its liabilities exceeding its assets.
- It is difficult to establish if GTX has efficiently used its assets last year compared to the US Consumer Durables industry average (Return on Assets) as it is loss-making.
- It is difficult to establish if GTX improved its use of capital last year versus 3 years ago (Return on Capital Employed) due to its liabilities exceeding its assets.
Past performance checks
We assess GTX's performance over the past 5 years by checking for:- Has earnings increased in past 5 years? (1 check)
- Has the earnings growth in the last year exceeded that of the Consumer Durables industry? (1 check)
- Is the recent earnings growth over the last year higher than the average annual growth over the past 5 years? (1 check)
- Is the Return on Equity (ROE) higher than 20%? (1 check)
- Is the Return on Assets (ROA) above industry average? (1 check)
- Has the Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) increased from 3 years ago? (1 check)
GTX has a total score of 0/6, see the detailed checks below.
Note: We use GAAP Net Income excluding extraordinary items in all our calculations.
Full details on the Past part of the Simply Wall St company analysis model.
GTXO Health
How is GTX's financial health and their level of debt?
A company's financial position is much like your own financial position,
it includes everything you own
(assets)
and owe
(liabilities).The boxes below represent the relative size of what makes up GTX's finances.
The net worth of a company is the difference between its assets and liabilities.
- GTX's short term (1 year) commitments are greater than its holdings of cash and other short term assets.
- GTX has no long term commitments.
Balance sheet
Assets
Liabilities and shares
- High level of physical assets or inventory.
- GTX has negative shareholder equity (liabilities exceed assets) therefore debt is not covered by short term assets.
Historical Debt
Nearly all companies have debt. Debt in itself isn’t
bad,
however if the debt is too high, or the company can’t afford to pay the interest
on its debts this may have impacts in the future.The graphic below shows equity (available funds) and debt, we ideally want to see the red area (debt) decreasing.
If there is any debt we look at the companies capability to repay it, and whether the level has increased over the past 5 years.
All data from GTX Company Filings, last reported 1 month ago.
| Date (Data in USD Millions) | Total Equity | Total Debt | Cash & Short Term Investments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | -3.72 | 2.48 | 0.03 |
| 2018-12-31 | -3.45 | 2.44 | 0.07 |
| 2018-09-30 | -2.96 | 2.30 | 0.02 |
| 2018-06-30 | -2.86 | 2.16 | 0.07 |
| 2018-03-31 | -2.38 | 1.81 | 0.02 |
| 2017-12-31 | -2.21 | 1.65 | 0.00 |
| 2017-09-30 | -1.94 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| 2017-06-30 | -1.64 | 1.27 | 0.01 |
| 2017-03-31 | -1.89 | 1.26 | 0.01 |
| 2016-12-31 | -1.48 | 1.30 | 0.10 |
| 2016-09-30 | -1.32 | 1.10 | 0.03 |
| 2016-06-30 | -1.49 | 0.65 | 0.14 |
| 2016-03-31 | -1.31 | 0.89 | 0.04 |
| 2015-12-31 | -1.18 | 0.76 | 0.01 |
| 2015-09-30 | -1.00 | 0.63 | 0.01 |
| 2015-06-30 | -1.05 | 0.63 | 0.06 |
| 2015-03-31 | -0.86 | 0.41 | 0.03 |
| 2014-12-31 | -1.07 | 0.37 | 0.01 |
| 2014-09-30 | -2.07 | 0.52 | 0.02 |
| 2014-06-30 | -1.91 | 0.46 | 0.02 |
| 2014-03-31 | -2.72 | 0.41 | 0.10 |
| 2013-12-31 | -1.30 | 0.33 | 0.06 |
| 2013-09-30 | -1.09 | 0.30 | 0.06 |
| 2013-06-30 | -0.66 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| 2013-03-31 | -0.53 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| 2012-12-31 | -0.53 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 2012-09-30 | -0.42 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| 2012-06-30 | -0.24 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
- GTX has negative shareholder equity (liabilities exceed assets), this is a more serious situation compared with a high debt level.
- Irrelevant to check if GTX's debt level has increased considering it has negative shareholder equity.
CASH RUNWAY ANALYSIS
For companies that have on average been loss making in the past we assess whether they have at least 1 year of cash runway.
- GTX has less than a year of cash runway based on current free cash flow.
- GTX has less than a year of cash runway if free cash flow continues to reduce at historical rates of -5% each year.
Financial health checks
We assess GTX's financial health by checking for:- Are short term assets greater than short term liabilities? (1 check)
- Are short term assets greater than long term liabilities? (1 check)
- Has the debt to equity ratio increased in the past 5 years? (1 check)
- Is the debt to equity ratio over 40%? (1 check)
- Is the debt covered by operating cash flow? (1 check)
- Are earnings greater than 5x the interest on debt (if company pays interest at all)? (1 check) GTX has a total score of 1/6, see the detailed checks below.
- Does cash and short term investments cover stable operating expenses (recurring G&A and R&D) for more than 3 years? (1 check)
- Does cash and short term investments cover growing operating expenses (recurring G&A and R&D) for more than 3 years? (1 check)
Full details on the Health part of the Simply Wall St company analysis model.
GTXO Dividends
What is GTX's current dividend yield, its reliability and sustainability?
Dividends are regular cash payments to you from the company, similar to a
bank paying you interest on a savings account.
Annual Dividend Income
If you bought
$2,000 of
GTX
shares you are expected to receive
$0
in your first year as a dividend.
Dividend Amount
- Unable to evaluate GTX's dividend yield against the bottom 25% of dividend payers as the company has not reported any payouts.
- Unable to evaluate GTX's dividend against the top 25% market benchmark as the company has not reported any payouts.
Annualized Historical and Future Dividends
It is important to see if the dividend for a company is stable, and not
wildly increasing/decreasing each year. This graph shows you the historical rate
to count toward your assessment of the stock.We also check to see if the dividend has increased in the past 10 years.
| Data Point | Source | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Past Annualized Dividend Yield | S&P Global Market Data | See Below |
| Past Dividends per Share | Company Filings/ Annualized Dividend Payments | See Below |
| Future Dividends per Share Estimates | Average of up to 0 Analyst Estimates (S&P Global) | See Below |
| United States of America Consumer Durables Industry Average Dividend Yield | Market Cap Weighted Average of 21 Stocks | 2.2% |
| United States of America Market Average Dividend Yield | Market Cap Weighted Average of 2003 Stocks | 2.5% |
| United States of America Minimum Threshold Dividend Yield | 10th Percentile | 0.8% |
| United States of America Bottom 25% Dividend Yield | 25th Percentile | 1.5% |
| United States of America Top 25% Dividend Yield | 75th Percentile | 3.7% |
Industry and Market average data is calculated daily.
Note all dividend per share amounts are annualized and not quarterly or other period.
Learn more about our ratios and growth rates in Simply Wall St’s analysis model >
- Unable to perform a dividend volatility check as GTX has not reported any payouts.
- Unable to verify if GTX's dividend has been increasing as the company has not reported any payouts.
Income/ dividend checks
We assess GTX's dividend by checking for:- Firstly is the company paying a notable dividend (greater than 0.8%) - if not then the rest of the checks are ignored.
- Is current dividend yield above the bottom 25% of dividend payers? (1 check)
- Is current dividend yield above the top 25% of dividend payers? (1 check)
- Have they paid a dividend for 10 years, and during this period has the dividend been volatile (drop of more than 25%)? (1 check)
- If they have paid a dividend for 10 years has it increased in this time? (1 check)
- How sustainable is the dividend, can GTX afford to pay it from its earnings today and in 3 years (Payout ratio less than 90%)? (2 checks) GTX has a total score of 0/6, see the detailed checks below.
Full details on the Dividends part of the Simply Wall St company analysis model.
GTXO Management
CEO
| COMPENSATION | $175,000 |
| AGE | 55 |
| TENURE AS CEO | 11.2 years |
CEO Bio
Mr. Patrick E. Bertagna Co-founded GTX Corp in 2002 and has been its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer since March 14, 2008. Mr. Bertagna founded Barcode World Inc. He transitioned into technology in 1993. His career spans for more than 27 years in building companies in both technology and consumer branded products. He began his career in consumer products importing apparel from Europe and later went on to import and manufacture apparel, accessories and footwear in over 20 countries. He has formed alliances with Fortune 500 companies such as IBM, AT&T, Sports Authority, Federated Stores, Netscape and GE. He has been a keynote speaker and has been awarded several patents. He is Co-Inventor of the patented GPS Footwear technology. Mr. Bertagna is fluent in French and Spanish.
CEO Compensation
- Patrick's compensation has increased whilst company is loss making.
- Patrick's remuneration is lower than average for companies of similar size in United States of America.
Management Team
Patrick Bertagna
Co-Founder
$175K
55
11.2 yrs
Louis Rosenbaum
Co-Founder
$10K
68
Alex McKean
Chief Financial Officer
$96K
54
7.6 yrs
Andrew Duncan
Head of International Business Development
$10K
53
Board of Directors Tenure
Average tenure and age of the GTX board of directors in years:
- The average tenure for the GTX board of directors is over 10 years, this suggests they are a seasoned and experienced board.
Board of Directors
Patrick Bertagna
Co-Founder
$175K
55
11.2 yrs
Louis Rosenbaum
Co-Founder
$10K
68
11.2 yrs
Andrew Duncan
Head of International Business Development
$10K
53
9.1 yrs
Frank O'Connell
74
Chris Walsh
Director
$10K
68
3.8 yrs
George Lauro
59
10.8 yrs
Gil Amelio
75
10.2 yrs
Larry Henneman
Jack Brewer
Theresa Gordon
Who owns this company?
Recent Insider Transactions
| Announced | Type | Name | Entity | Role | Start | End | Shares | Max Price ($) | Value ($) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Management checks
We assess GTX's management by checking for:- Is the CEO's compensation unreasonable compared to market cap? (1 check)
- Has the CEO's compensation increased more than 20% whilst the EPS is down more then 20%? (1 check)
- Is the average tenure of the management team less than 2 years? (1 check)
- Is the average tenure of the board of directors team less than 3 years? (1 check) GTX has a total score of 0/6, this is not included on the snowflake, see the detailed checks below.
Note: We use the top 6 management executives and board members in our calculations.
Note 2: Insider trading include any internal stakeholders and these transactions .
Full details on the Management part of the Simply Wall St company analysis model.
GTXO Company Info
Description
GTX Corp, through its subsidiaries, designs, develops, and sells various products and services in the personal location services marketplace in the United States and internationally. The company offers global positioning system (GPS) and Bluetooth low energy (BLE), and hand-held GPS tracking devices with a hosted and scalable backend monitoring platform for real-time tracking of the whereabouts of people, pets, or high valued assets through a miniaturized transceiver module, wireless connectivity gateway, middleware, and viewing portal. It also develops and owns LOCiMobile, a suite of mobile tracking applications that turn smartphones and tablets, such as iPhone, iPad, Google Android, and other GPS enabled handsets into a tracking and location based social networking device, which can be viewed through its tracking portal or on any connected device with Internet access. In addition, the company offers Track My Work Force, which allows employers to track and monitor employees, drivers, sales representatives, and others using their smartphone, tablet, or any wireless devices; and other applications. GTX Corp has a collaboration agreement with Veristride, Inc. to incorporate its inductive charging technology, enhance and miniaturize the electronics, develop a BLE, and embed the final hardware assembly into SmartSole, a GPS tracking device. The company was founded in 2002 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.
Details
| Name: | GTX Corp |
| GTXO | |
| Exchange: | OTCPK |
| Founded: | 2002 |
| $911,842 | |
| 82,894,792 | |
| Website: | http://gtxcorp.com |
| Address: |
GTX Corp 117 West 9th Street, Suite 1214, Los Angeles, California, 90015, United States |
Listings
| Exchange Symbol | Ticker Symbol | Security | Exchange | Country | Currency | Listed on | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTCPK | GTXO | Common Stock | Pink Sheets LLC | US | USD | 09. Mar 2007 |
Number of employees
Current staff
Industry
| Consumer Electronics | |
| Consumer Durables |
Company Analysis and Financial Data Status
| Area | Date (UTC time) |
|---|---|
| Company Analysis updated: | 2019/05/22 06:06 |
| End of day share price update: | 2019/05/21 00:00 |
| Last earnings filing: | 2019/05/20 |
| Last earnings reported: | 2019/03/31 |
| Last annual earnings reported: | 2018/12/31 |
All dates and times in UTC. All financial data provided by Standard & Poor’s Capital IQ.
Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more here.
