This company listing is no longer active

This company may still be operating, however this listing is no longer active. Find out why through their latest events.

View Valuation

Is VIEW.Q undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?

Valuation Score

2/6

Valuation Score 2/6

  • Below Fair Value

  • Significantly Below Fair Value

  • Price-To-Sales vs Peers

  • Price-To-Sales vs Industry

  • Price-To-Sales vs Fair Ratio

  • Analyst Forecast

Share Price vs Fair Value

What is the Fair Price of VIEW.Q when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

Below Fair Value: Insufficient data to calculate VIEW.Q's fair value for valuation analysis.

Significantly Below Fair Value: Insufficient data to calculate VIEW.Q's fair value for valuation analysis.


Key Valuation Metric

Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for VIEW.Q?

Key metric: As VIEW.Q is unprofitable we use its Price-To-Sales Ratio for relative valuation analysis.

The above table shows the Price to Sales ratio for VIEW.Q. This is calculated by dividing VIEW.Q's market cap by their current revenue.
What is VIEW.Q's PS Ratio?
PS Ratio0.003x
SalesUS$128.84m
Market CapUS$325.36k

Price to Sales Ratio vs Peers

How does VIEW.Q's PS Ratio compare to its peers?

The above table shows the PS ratio for VIEW.Q vs its peers. Here we also display the market cap and forecasted growth for additional consideration.
CompanyForward PSEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
Peer Average0.3x
ACPS AC Partners
0.5xn/aUS$852.4k
AUVI.Q Applied UV
0.00001xn/aUS$428.0
HMTC Homasote
0.1xn/aUS$2.2m
NCL Northann
0.7xn/aUS$10.7m
0.003xn/aUS$325.4k

Price-To-Sales vs Peers: VIEW.Q is good value based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (0x) compared to the peer average (0.1x).


Price to Sales Ratio vs Industry

How does VIEW.Q's PS Ratio compare vs other companies in the US Building Industry?

8 CompaniesPrice / SalesEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
Industry Avg.1.5x5.2%
0.003xn/aUS$325.36k
JELD JELD-WEN Holding
0.1x-2.9%US$474.31m
CSTE Caesarstone
0.3x1.4%US$126.06m
VIEW.Q 0.0xIndustry Avg. 1.5xNo. of Companies8PS01.22.43.64.86+
8 CompaniesEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
Industry Avg.1.5x13.0%
0.003xn/aUS$325.36k
No more companies

Price-To-Sales vs Industry: VIEW.Q is good value based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (0x) compared to the US Building industry average (1.6x).


Price to Sales Ratio vs Fair Ratio

What is VIEW.Q's PS Ratio compared to its Fair PS Ratio? This is the expected PS Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.

VIEW.Q PS Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PS Ratio0.003x
Fair PS Ration/a

Price-To-Sales vs Fair Ratio: Insufficient data to calculate VIEW.Q's Price-To-Sales Fair Ratio for valuation analysis.


Analyst Price Targets

What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?

Analyst Forecast: Insufficient data to show price forecast.


Discover undervalued companies

Company Analysis and Financial Data Status

DataLast Updated (UTC time)
Company Analysis2024/05/23 08:47
End of Day Share Price 2024/05/23 00:00
Earnings2023/09/30
Annual Earnings2022/12/31

Data Sources

The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.

PackageDataTimeframeExample US Source *
Company Financials10 years
  • Income statement
  • Cash flow statement
  • Balance sheet
Analyst Consensus Estimates+3 years
  • Forecast financials
  • Analyst price targets
Market Prices30 years
  • Stock prices
  • Dividends, Splits and Actions
Ownership10 years
  • Top shareholders
  • Insider trading
Management10 years
  • Leadership team
  • Board of directors
Key Developments10 years
  • Company announcements

* Example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.

Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more.

Analysis Model and Snowflake

Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.

Learn about the world class team who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.

Industry and Sector Metrics

Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on Github.

Analyst Sources

View, Inc. is covered by 3 analysts. 0 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.

AnalystInstitution
Joshua CohenCantor Fitzgerald & Co.
Mark DelaneyGoldman Sachs
Pavel MolchanovRaymond James & Associates