Stock Analysis

Here's What's Concerning About Nanofilm Technologies International's (SGX:MZH) Returns On Capital

SGX:MZH
Source: Shutterstock

If we want to find a potential multi-bagger, often there are underlying trends that can provide clues. One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. This shows us that it's a compounding machine, able to continually reinvest its earnings back into the business and generate higher returns. In light of that, when we looked at Nanofilm Technologies International (SGX:MZH) and its ROCE trend, we weren't exactly thrilled.

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Nanofilm Technologies International is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.12 = S$69m ÷ (S$616m - S$49m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2022).

So, Nanofilm Technologies International has an ROCE of 12%. That's a pretty standard return and it's in line with the industry average of 12%.

View our latest analysis for Nanofilm Technologies International

roce
SGX:MZH Return on Capital Employed August 17th 2022

In the above chart we have measured Nanofilm Technologies International's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Nanofilm Technologies International here for free.

What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us

In terms of Nanofilm Technologies International's historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. To be more specific, ROCE has fallen from 27% over the last four years. Although, given both revenue and the amount of assets employed in the business have increased, it could suggest the company is investing in growth, and the extra capital has led to a short-term reduction in ROCE. If these investments prove successful, this can bode very well for long term stock performance.

On a side note, Nanofilm Technologies International has done well to pay down its current liabilities to 7.9% of total assets. So we could link some of this to the decrease in ROCE. What's more, this can reduce some aspects of risk to the business because now the company's suppliers or short-term creditors are funding less of its operations. Since the business is basically funding more of its operations with it's own money, you could argue this has made the business less efficient at generating ROCE.

The Bottom Line On Nanofilm Technologies International's ROCE

Even though returns on capital have fallen in the short term, we find it promising that revenue and capital employed have both increased for Nanofilm Technologies International. These growth trends haven't led to growth returns though, since the stock has fallen 40% over the last year. So we think it'd be worthwhile to look further into this stock given the trends look encouraging.

Nanofilm Technologies International does have some risks though, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Nanofilm Technologies International that you might be interested in.

While Nanofilm Technologies International may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Nanofilm Technologies International might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.