Polenergia Valuation
Is PEP undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?
Valuation Score
2/6Valuation Score 2/6
Below Future Cash Flow Value
Significantly Below Future Cash Flow Value
Price-To-Sales vs Peers
Price-To-Sales vs Industry
Price-To-Sales vs Fair Ratio
Analyst Forecast
Share Price vs Fair Value
What is the Fair Price of PEP when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.
Ultimate guide to DCF valuation for stock investing
Learn how to determine fair value like the best investors in the world.
Below Future Cash Flow Value: PEP (PLN53.2) is trading above our estimate of future cash flow value (PLN30.22)
Significantly Below Future Cash Flow Value: PEP is trading above our estimate of future cash flow value.
Key Valuation Metric
Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for PEP?
Key metric: As PEP is unprofitable we use its Price-To-Sales Ratio for relative valuation analysis.
| What is PEP's PS Ratio? | |
|---|---|
| PS Ratio | 1x |
| Sales | zł3.93b |
| Market Cap | zł4.11b |
| Key Statistics | |
|---|---|
| Enterprise Value/Revenue | 1.6x |
| Enterprise Value/EBITDA | 13.6x |
| PEG Ratio | n/a |
Price to Sales Ratio vs Peers
How does PEP's PS Ratio compare to its peers?
| Company | Forward PS | Estimated Growth | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer Average | 1.4x | ||
MDI MDI Energia | 0.5x | n/a | zł89.7m |
FIG Figene Capital | 4.3x | n/a | zł105.0m |
ENA ENEA | 0.4x | -1.97% | zł10.6b |
TPE TAURON Polska Energia | 0.5x | 0.26% | zł16.2b |
PEP Polenergia | 1x | -3.34% | zł4.1b |
Price-To-Sales vs Peers: PEP is good value based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (1x) compared to the peer average (1.4x).
Historical Price to Sales Ratio
Historical Price to Sales Ratio compares a stock's price to its sales over time. Higher ratios indicate that investors are willing to pay more for the stock.
Fetching historical data
Price to Sales Ratio vs Industry
How does PEP's PS Ratio compare vs other companies in the European Renewable Energy Industry?
| 16 Companies | Price / Sales | Estimated Growth | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Companies | Estimated Growth | Market Cap | |
|---|---|---|---|
Price-To-Sales vs Industry: PEP is good value based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (1x) compared to the European Renewable Energy industry average (2.7x).
Price to Sales Ratio vs Fair Ratio
What is PEP's PS Ratio compared to its Fair PS Ratio? This is the expected PS Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.
| Fair Ratio | |
|---|---|
| Current PS Ratio | 1x |
| Fair PS Ratio | 0.4x |
Price-To-Sales vs Fair Ratio: PEP is expensive based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (1x) compared to the estimated Fair Price-To-Sales Ratio (0.4x).
Analyst Price Targets
What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?
| Date | Share Price | Average 1Y Price Target | Dispersion | High | Low | 1Y Actual price | Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | zł53.20 | zł66.20 +24.44% | 23.76% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| Sep ’27 | zł54.10 | zł66.20 +22.37% | 23.76% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| Aug ’27 | zł63.00 | zł62.70 -0.48% | 25.16% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| Jul ’27 | zł60.90 | zł62.70 +2.96% | 25.16% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| Jun ’27 | zł51.70 | zł62.70 +21.28% | 25.16% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| May ’27 | zł51.20 | zł62.70 +22.46% | 25.16% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| Apr ’27 | zł49.10 | zł62.70 +27.70% | 25.16% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| Mar ’27 | zł50.40 | zł62.70 +24.40% | 25.16% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| Feb ’27 | zł54.00 | zł65.87 +21.98% | 23.78% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| Jan ’27 | zł53.20 | zł65.87 +23.81% | 23.78% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| Dec ’26 | zł58.20 | zł65.87 +13.17% | 23.78% | zł83.60 | zł45.50 | n/a | 3 |
| Nov ’26 | zł57.20 | zł78.00 +36.36% | 7.18% | zł83.60 | zł72.40 | n/a | 2 |
| Oct ’26 | zł60.00 | zł78.00 +30.00% | 7.18% | zł83.60 | zł72.40 | n/a | 2 |
| Sep ’26 | zł56.00 | zł78.00 +39.29% | 7.18% | zł83.60 | zł72.40 | zł54.10 | 2 |
| Aug ’26 | zł59.60 | zł78.00 +30.87% | 7.18% | zł83.60 | zł72.40 | zł63.00 | 2 |
| Jul ’26 | zł59.40 | zł77.25 +30.05% | 8.22% | zł83.60 | zł70.90 | zł60.90 | 2 |
| Jun ’26 | zł69.20 | zł76.90 +11.13% | 8.71% | zł83.60 | zł70.20 | zł51.70 | 2 |
| May ’26 | zł64.20 | zł76.90 +19.78% | 8.71% | zł83.60 | zł70.20 | zł51.20 | 2 |
| Apr ’26 | zł68.60 | zł76.90 +12.10% | 8.71% | zł83.60 | zł70.20 | zł49.10 | 2 |
| Mar ’26 | zł68.00 | zł80.60 +18.53% | 3.72% | zł83.60 | zł77.60 | zł50.40 | 2 |
| Feb ’26 | zł65.60 | zł88.61 +35.08% | 13.08% | zł104.63 | zł77.60 | zł54.00 | 3 |
| Jan ’26 | zł69.60 | zł88.61 +27.31% | 13.08% | zł104.63 | zł77.60 | zł53.20 | 3 |
| Dec ’25 | zł71.00 | zł91.59 +29.00% | 17.18% | zł113.57 | zł77.60 | zł58.20 | 3 |
| Nov ’25 | zł76.00 | zł95.12 +25.16% | 13.85% | zł113.57 | zł83.60 | zł57.20 | 3 |
| Oct ’25 | zł71.60 | zł95.12 +32.85% | 13.85% | zł113.57 | zł83.60 | zł60.00 | 3 |
| Sep ’25 | zł71.80 | zł91.96 +28.08% | 9.55% | zł104.09 | zł83.60 | zł56.00 | 3 |
Analyst Forecast: Target price is more than 20% higher than the current share price, but analysts are not within a statistically confident range of agreement.
Discover undervalued companies
Company Analysis and Financial Data Status
| Data | Last Updated (UTC time) |
|---|---|
| Company Analysis | 2026/09/21 08:38 |
| End of Day Share Price | 2026/09/21 00:00 |
| Earnings | 2026/03/31 |
| Annual Earnings | 2025/12/31 |
Data Sources
The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.
| Package | Data | Timeframe | Example US Source * |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Financials | 10 years |
| |
| Analyst Consensus Estimates | +3 years |
|
|
| Market Prices | 30 years |
| |
| Ownership | 10 years |
| |
| Management | 10 years |
| |
| Key Developments | 10 years |
|
* Example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.
Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more.
Analysis Model and Snowflake
Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.
Learn about the who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.
Industry and Sector Metrics
Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on Github.
Analyst Sources
Polenergia S.A. is covered by 5 analysts. 2 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.
| Analyst | Institution |
|---|---|
| Lukasz Prokopiuk | Dom Maklerski Banku Ochrony Srodowiska S.A. |
| Pawel Puchalski | Erste Bank Polska S.A. |
| Petr Bartek | Erste Group Bank AG |