Stock Analysis

Is Namsung (KRX:004270) Using Too Much Debt?

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Namsung Corp. (KRX:004270) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

Advertisement

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

How Much Debt Does Namsung Carry?

As you can see below, at the end of June 2025, Namsung had ₩96.4b of debt, up from ₩86.4b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had ₩43.6b in cash, and so its net debt is ₩52.7b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
KOSE:A004270 Debt to Equity History November 3rd 2025

How Healthy Is Namsung's Balance Sheet?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Namsung had liabilities of ₩133.5b due within 12 months and liabilities of ₩36.5b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had ₩43.6b in cash and ₩10.3b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total ₩116.0b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

This deficit casts a shadow over the ₩25.8b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, Namsung would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Namsung will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

Check out our latest analysis for Namsung

In the last year Namsung's revenue was pretty flat, and it made a negative EBIT. While that's not too bad, we'd prefer see growth.

Caveat Emptor

Importantly, Namsung had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss over the last year. Indeed, it lost ₩1.1b at the EBIT level. Combining this information with the significant liabilities we already touched on makes us very hesitant about this stock, to say the least. Of course, it may be able to improve its situation with a bit of luck and good execution. Nevertheless, we would not bet on it given that it vaporized ₩11b in cash over the last twelve months, and it doesn't have much by way of liquid assets. So we think this stock is risky, like walking through a dirty dog park with a mask on. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Namsung (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Namsung might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.