BYC Valuation

Is A001465 undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?

Valuation Score

0/6

Valuation Score 0/6

  • Below Fair Value

  • Significantly Below Fair Value

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Peers

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Industry

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio

  • Analyst Forecast

Share Price vs Fair Value

What is the Fair Price of A001465 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

Below Fair Value: A001465 (₩12990) is trading above our estimate of fair value (₩11326.47)

Significantly Below Fair Value: A001465 is trading above our estimate of fair value.


Key Valuation Metric

Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for A001465?

Key metric: As A001465 is profitable we use its Price-To-Earnings Ratio for relative valuation analysis.

The above table shows the Price to Earnings ratio for A001465. This is calculated by dividing A001465's market cap by their current earnings.
What is A001465's PE Ratio?
PE Ratio17.8x
Earnings₩13.65b
Market Cap₩206.58b

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Peers

How does A001465's PE Ratio compare to its peers?

The above table shows the PE ratio for A001465 vs its peers. Here we also display the market cap and forecasted growth for additional consideration.
CompanyForward PEEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
Peer Average17.6x
2.5x23.2%₩192.6b
A016450 Hansae Yes24 Holdings
3.6xn/a₩175.4b
A472850 Pond Group
60.3xn/a₩168.8b
A005390 Shinsung Tongsang
3.9xn/a₩296.8b
17.8xn/a₩206.6b

Price-To-Earnings vs Peers: A001465 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (17.8x) compared to the peer average (17.3x).


Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry

How does A001465's PE Ratio compare vs other companies in the KR Luxury Industry?

1 CompanyPrice / EarningsEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
A000950 Chonbang
1.5xn/aUS$15.38m
No more companies available in this PE range
A001465 17.8xIndustry Avg. 8.1xNo. of Companies10PE0816243240+
1 CompanyEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
No more companies

Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: A001465 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (17.8x) compared to the KR Luxury industry average (8.1x).


Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio

What is A001465's PE Ratio compared to its Fair PE Ratio? This is the expected PE Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.

A001465 PE Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PE Ratio17.8x
Fair PE Ration/a

Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: Insufficient data to calculate A001465's Price-To-Earnings Fair Ratio for valuation analysis.


Analyst Price Targets

What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?

Analyst Forecast: Insufficient data to show price forecast.


Discover undervalued companies