BrainPad Valuation

Q: What is the Fair Price of 3655 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

3655 (¥1140) is trading below our estimate of [[fair value]] (¥1249.44)

Is 3655 undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?

Valuation Score

1/6

Valuation Score 1/6

Below Fair Value
Significantly Below Fair Value
Price-To-Earnings vs Peers
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio
Analyst Forecast

Share Price vs Fair Value

What is the Fair Price of 3655 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

Below Fair Value: 3655 (¥1140) is trading below our estimate of fair value (¥1249.44)

Significantly Below Fair Value: 3655 is trading below fair value, but not by a significant amount.

Key Valuation Metric

Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for 3655?

Key metric: As 3655 is profitable we use its Price-To-Earnings Ratio for relative valuation analysis.

The above table shows the Price to Earnings ratio for 3655. This is calculated by dividing 3655's market cap by their current earnings.
What is 3655's PE Ratio?
PE Ratio	23.3x
Earnings	JP¥1.05b
Market Cap	JP¥24.50b

3655 key valuation metrics and ratios. From Price to Earnings, Price to Sales and Price to Book to Price to Earnings Growth Ratio, Enterprise Value and EBITDA.
Key Statistics
Enterprise Value/Revenue	2x
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	10.9x
PEG Ratio	2.1x

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Peers

How does 3655's PE Ratio compare to its peers?

The above table shows the PE ratio for 3655 vs its peers. Here we also display the market cap and forecasted growth for additional consideration.
Company	Forward PE	Estimated Growth	Market Cap
Peer Average	17.4x
4072 Densan System Holdings	33x	33.2%	JP¥25.5b
9600 I-Net	11x	n/a	JP¥23.7b
4709 ID Holdings	13.5x	8.8%	JP¥27.1b
2349 Nippon Information Development	12.2x	n/a	JP¥28.2b
3655 BrainPad	23.3x	11.2%	JP¥24.5b

Price-To-Earnings vs Peers: 3655 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (23.3x) compared to the peer average (17.4x).

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry

How does 3655's PE Ratio compare vs other companies in the JP IT Industry?

0 Companies	Price / Earnings	Estimated Growth	Market Cap

No more companies available in this PE range

0 Companies		Estimated Growth	Market Cap

No more companies

Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: 3655 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (23.3x) compared to the JP IT industry average (17.4x).

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio

What is 3655's PE Ratio compared to its Fair PE Ratio? This is the expected PE Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.

3655 PE Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PE Ratio	23.3x
Fair PE Ratio	19.3x

Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: 3655 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (23.3x) compared to the estimated Fair Price-To-Earnings Ratio (19.3x).

Analyst Price Targets

What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?

Analyst Forecast: Insufficient data to show price forecast.

Discover undervalued companies

Company Analysis and Financial Data Status

Data	Last Updated (UTC time)
Company Analysis	2024/12/26 14:16
End of Day Share Price	2024/12/26 00:00
Earnings	2024/09/30
Annual Earnings	2024/06/30

Data Sources

The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.

Package	Data	Timeframe	Example US Source ^*
Company Financials	10 years	Income statement Cash flow statement Balance sheet	SEC Form 10-K SEC Form 10-Q
Analyst Consensus Estimates	+3 years	Forecast financials Analyst price targets	Analyst Research Reports Blue Matrix
Market Prices	30 years	Stock prices Dividends, Splits and Actions	ICE Market Data SEC Form S-1
Ownership	10 years	Top shareholders Insider trading	SEC Form 4 SEC Form 13D
Management	10 years	Leadership team Board of directors	SEC Form 10-K SEC Form DEF 14A
Key Developments	10 years	Company announcements	SEC Form 8-K

^* example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.

Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more here.

Analysis Model and Snowflake

Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.

Learn about the world class team who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.

Industry and Sector Metrics

Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on .

Analyst Sources

BrainPad Inc. is covered by 3 analysts. 1 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.

Analyst	Institution
Teruo Isozaki	Ichiyoshi Research Institute Inc.
Daisaku Masuno	Nomura Securities Co. Ltd.
null null	Storm Research Limited