Taihei Dengyo Kaisha, Ltd.

TSE:1968 Stock Report

Market Cap: JP¥100.9b

Taihei Dengyo Kaisha Valuation

Is 1968 undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?

Valuation Score

3/6

Valuation Score 3/6

  • Below Fair Value

  • Significantly Below Fair Value

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Peers

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Industry

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio

  • Analyst Forecast

Share Price vs Fair Value

What is the Fair Price of 1968 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

Below Fair Value: 1968 (¥5020) is trading above our estimate of fair value (¥1438.49)

Significantly Below Fair Value: 1968 is trading above our estimate of fair value.


Key Valuation Metric

Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for 1968?

Key metric: As 1968 is profitable we use its Price-To-Earnings Ratio for relative valuation analysis.

The above table shows the Price to Earnings ratio for 1968. This is calculated by dividing 1968's market cap by their current earnings.
What is 1968's PE Ratio?
PE Ratio10.6x
EarningsJP¥9.55b
Market CapJP¥100.95b

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Peers

How does 1968's PE Ratio compare to its peers?

The above table shows the PE ratio for 1968 vs its peers. Here we also display the market cap and forecasted growth for additional consideration.
CompanyForward PEEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
Peer Average11.7x
1950 Nippon Densetsu Kogyo
11.6x4.7%JP¥113.8b
1926 Raito Kogyo
11.9x6.4%JP¥99.4b
1934 Yurtec
11.9xn/aJP¥103.3b
6379 RAIZNEXT
11.5xn/aJP¥81.0b
1968 Taihei Dengyo Kaisha
10.6x4.7%JP¥100.9b

Price-To-Earnings vs Peers: 1968 is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (10.6x) compared to the peer average (11.7x).


Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry

How does 1968's PE Ratio compare vs other companies in the JP Construction Industry?

0 CompaniesPrice / EarningsEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
No more companies available in this PE range
1968 10.6xIndustry Avg. 11.4xNo. of Companies24PE0612182430+
0 CompaniesEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
No more companies

Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: 1968 is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (10.6x) compared to the JP Construction industry average (11.1x).


Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio

What is 1968's PE Ratio compared to its Fair PE Ratio? This is the expected PE Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.

1968 PE Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PE Ratio10.6x
Fair PE Ratio11.3x

Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: 1968 is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (10.6x) compared to the estimated Fair Price-To-Earnings Ratio (11.3x).


Analyst Price Targets

What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?

Analyst Forecast: Insufficient data to show price forecast.


Discover undervalued companies