Is BasicNet (BIT:BAN) A Risky Investment?

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, BasicNet S.p.A. (BIT:BAN) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Advertisement

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

View our latest analysis for BasicNet

How Much Debt Does BasicNet Carry?

As you can see below, BasicNet had €83.8m of debt, at June 2021, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it does have €22.3m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about €61.5m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
BIT:BAN Debt to Equity History December 24th 2021

A Look At BasicNet's Liabilities

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that BasicNet had liabilities of €128.0m due within 12 months and liabilities of €69.3m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of €22.3m and €59.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total €115.7m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

This deficit isn't so bad because BasicNet is worth €311.8m, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

BasicNet's net debt is 3.3 times its EBITDA, which is a significant but still reasonable amount of leverage. But its EBIT was about 12.1 times its interest expense, implying the company isn't really paying a high cost to maintain that level of debt. Even were the low cost to prove unsustainable, that is a good sign. Pleasingly, BasicNet is growing its EBIT faster than former Australian PM Bob Hawke downs a yard glass, boasting a 182% gain in the last twelve months. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since BasicNet will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, BasicNet actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.

Our View

Happily, BasicNet's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its net debt to EBITDA. Looking at the bigger picture, we think BasicNet's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for BasicNet that you should be aware of.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if BasicNet might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About BIT:BAN

BasicNet

Operates in the sports and casual clothing, footwear, and accessories sectors in Europe, the Americas, Asia, Oceania, the Middle East, and Africa.

Adequate balance sheet unattractive dividend payer.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
VTIX logo
Lou_Basenese on Virtuix Holdings ·

From a “Shark Tank” Snub to an Air Force “Yes”: Why Virtuix at $3.50 May Be the Market’s Most Mispriced AI Story

Fair Value:US$7.562.8% undervalued
28 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
IN
Investingwilly
MA logo
Investingwilly on Mastercard ·

Mastercard: The Best Dividend Stock You're Ignoring

Fair Value:US$75033.5% undervalued
73 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
INTU logo
tripledub on Intuit ·

A Wonderful Business at a Not-So-Wonderful Price

Fair Value:US$56052.2% undervalued
66 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
30 users have liked this narrative
TA
Talos
HYFT logo
Talos on MindWalk Holdings ·

The Asymmetric TechBio Play: MindWalk Holdings and the Valuation Disconnect

Fair Value:US$8.2780.9% undervalued
36 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

EV
2190 logo
everyseed on Zylox-Tonbridge Medical Technology ·

Zylox-Tonbridge: Early Signs of an Emerging Global Vascular Intervention Platform

Fair Value:HK$30.8539.9% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AN
GEOHAN logo
Anthony_Lee on Geohan Corporation Berhad ·

Geohan's Growth Outlook Brightens on Expanding Order Book and Easing Cost Pressures

Fair Value:RM 0.7460.8% undervalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
DA
CSL logo
danmad on CSL ·

Strong buy. World-leading healthcare company with steady growth

Fair Value:AU$143.1519.4% undervalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

IN
Investingwilly
MA logo
Investingwilly on Mastercard ·

Mastercard: The Best Dividend Stock You're Ignoring

Fair Value:US$75033.5% undervalued
73 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
HA
HarishPK
ADBE logo
HarishPK on Adobe ·

Adobe: A Probabilistic Case for Undervaluation

Fair Value:US$319.9636.6% undervalued
62 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative
MA
martinarauz
NU logo
martinarauz on Nu Holdings ·

Investment Analysis (May 2026)

Fair Value:US$22.7442.1% undervalued
68 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative