Chaoda Modern Agriculture (Holdings) Valuation

Is 682 undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?

Valuation Score

1/6

Valuation Score 1/6

Below Fair Value
Significantly Below Fair Value
Price-To-Sales vs Peers
Price-To-Sales vs Industry
Price-To-Sales vs Fair Ratio
Analyst Forecast

Share Price vs Fair Value

What is the Fair Price of 682 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

Below Fair Value: Insufficient data to calculate 682's fair value for valuation analysis.

Significantly Below Fair Value: Insufficient data to calculate 682's fair value for valuation analysis.

Key Valuation Metric

Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for 682?

Key metric: As 682 is unprofitable we use its Price-To-Sales Ratio for relative valuation analysis.

The above table shows the Price to Sales ratio for 682. This is calculated by dividing 682's market cap by their current revenue.
What is 682's PS Ratio?
PS Ratio	0.5x
Sales	CN¥74.47m
Market Cap	CN¥35.60m

682 key valuation metrics and ratios. From Price to Earnings, Price to Sales and Price to Book to Price to Earnings Growth Ratio, Enterprise Value and EBITDA.
Key Statistics
Enterprise Value/Revenue	n/a
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	n/a
PEG Ratio	n/a

Price to Sales Ratio vs Peers

How does 682's PS Ratio compare to its peers?

The above table shows the PS ratio for 682 vs its peers. Here we also display the market cap and forecasted growth for additional consideration.
Company	Forward PS	Estimated Growth	Market Cap
Peer Average	0.5x
73 Asian Citrus Holdings	0.2x	n/a	HK$36.8m
969 Hua Lien International (Holding)	1.3x	n/a	HK$201.6m
3839 Chia Tai Enterprises International	0.2x	n/a	HK$361.1m
1431 YuanShengTai Dairy Farm	0.3x	n/a	HK$750.5m
682 Chaoda Modern Agriculture (Holdings)	0.5x	n/a	HK$37.9m

Price-To-Sales vs Peers: 682 is expensive based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (0.5x) compared to the peer average (0.5x).

Price to Sales Ratio vs Industry

How does 682's PS Ratio compare vs other companies in the HK Food Industry?

7 Companies	Price / Sales	Estimated Growth	Market Cap
3838 China Starch Holdings	0.09x	n/a	US$141.27m
3999 DaChan Food (Asia)	0.1x	n/a	US$79.80m
359 China Haisheng Juice Holdings	0.04x	n/a	US$8.06m
841 Asia Cassava Resources Holdings	0.07x	n/a	US$7.08m

7 Companies		Estimated Growth	Market Cap

No more companies

Price-To-Sales vs Industry: 682 is good value based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (0.5x) compared to the Hong Kong Food industry average (0.5x).

Price to Sales Ratio vs Fair Ratio

What is 682's PS Ratio compared to its Fair PS Ratio? This is the expected PS Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.

682 PS Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PS Ratio	0.5x
Fair PS Ratio	n/a

Price-To-Sales vs Fair Ratio: Insufficient data to calculate 682's Price-To-Sales Fair Ratio for valuation analysis.

Analyst Price Targets

What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?

Analyst Forecast: Insufficient data to show price forecast.

Discover undervalued companies

Company Analysis and Financial Data Status

Data	Last Updated (UTC time)
Company Analysis	2024/12/24 09:17
End of Day Share Price	2024/12/24 00:00
Earnings	2024/06/30
Annual Earnings	2024/06/30

Data Sources

The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.

Package	Data	Timeframe	Example US Source ^*
Company Financials	10 years	Income statement Cash flow statement Balance sheet	SEC Form 10-K SEC Form 10-Q
Analyst Consensus Estimates	+3 years	Forecast financials Analyst price targets	Analyst Research Reports Blue Matrix
Market Prices	30 years	Stock prices Dividends, Splits and Actions	ICE Market Data SEC Form S-1
Ownership	10 years	Top shareholders Insider trading	SEC Form 4 SEC Form 13D
Management	10 years	Leadership team Board of directors	SEC Form 10-K SEC Form DEF 14A
Key Developments	10 years	Company announcements	SEC Form 8-K

^* example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.

Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more here.

Analysis Model and Snowflake

Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.

Learn about the world class team who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.

Industry and Sector Metrics

Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on .

Analyst Sources

Chaoda Modern Agriculture (Holdings) Limited is covered by 5 analysts. 0 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.

Analyst	Institution
K. Lau	Citigroup Inc
Alex Fan	Daiwa Securities Co. Ltd.
Kok Chong	Everbright Securities International (HK) Limited (“EBSIHK”)