Stock Analysis

China East Education Holdings' (HKG:667) Returns On Capital Not Reflecting Well On The Business

Published
SEHK:667

When researching a stock for investment, what can tell us that the company is in decline? A business that's potentially in decline often shows two trends, a return on capital employed (ROCE) that's declining, and a base of capital employed that's also declining. Trends like this ultimately mean the business is reducing its investments and also earning less on what it has invested. So after glancing at the trends within China East Education Holdings (HKG:667), we weren't too hopeful.

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for China East Education Holdings:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.064 = CN¥430m ÷ (CN¥9.3b - CN¥2.5b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

So, China East Education Holdings has an ROCE of 6.4%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Consumer Services industry average of 11%.

View our latest analysis for China East Education Holdings

SEHK:667 Return on Capital Employed December 19th 2024

Above you can see how the current ROCE for China East Education Holdings compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for China East Education Holdings .

What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us

We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at China East Education Holdings. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 12% that they were earning five years ago. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on China East Education Holdings becoming one if things continue as they have.

What We Can Learn From China East Education Holdings' ROCE

All in all, the lower returns from the same amount of capital employed aren't exactly signs of a compounding machine. This could explain why the stock has sunk a total of 77% in the last five years. That being the case, unless the underlying trends revert to a more positive trajectory, we'd consider looking elsewhere.

China East Education Holdings does have some risks though, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for China East Education Holdings that you might be interested in.

While China East Education Holdings isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.