Here's Why Shape Robotics (CPH:SHAPE) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Shape Robotics A/S (CPH:SHAPE) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Advertisement

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

What Is Shape Robotics's Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2025 Shape Robotics had debt of kr.158.5m, up from kr.34.0m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of kr.4.25m, its net debt is less, at about kr.154.2m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
CPSE:SHAPE Debt to Equity History November 5th 2025

How Healthy Is Shape Robotics' Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Shape Robotics had liabilities of kr.429.3m due within a year, and liabilities of kr.35.5m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had kr.4.25m in cash and kr.237.1m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total kr.223.5m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of kr.258.9m, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Shape Robotics' use of debt. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.

View our latest analysis for Shape Robotics

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

Shape Robotics has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.6 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 2.7 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. One redeeming factor for Shape Robotics is that it turned last year's EBIT loss into a gain of kr.42m, over the last twelve months. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Shape Robotics will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it is important to check how much of its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) converts to actual free cash flow. Over the last year, Shape Robotics saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

Our View

We'd go so far as to say Shape Robotics's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was disappointing. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. We're quite clear that we consider Shape Robotics to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should learn about the 5 warning signs we've spotted with Shape Robotics (including 2 which are significant) .

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

Gold miners still look inexpensive because the market thinks we're near the top of the cycle. Given what's happening to the dollar, I'm not so sure.

Gold miners still look inexpensive because the market thinks we're near the top of the cycle. Given what's happening to the dollar, I'm not so sure. cover
2219
ST
steve_investor

Is it a safer bet on gold to have just exposure to ETFs?

MA
marcus_l38oa

Between 2003 and 2011, gold nearly went 5x. Dollar went weak too. The gold companies did bad. It is worth noting that between 2003 and 2011, there was 2008! I will leave it your inference and research.

Mitchell Lawler

Why friction decides which payment stocks collect the fee

Why friction decides which payment stocks collect the fee cover
Every new payment app was supposed to kill Visa and Mastercard. Instead, they got bigger. So what does that mean for the payment stocks on your radar?
31

About CPSE:SHAPE

Shape Robotics

An educational technology company, engages in the provision of intelligent classroom solutions, educational robots, software, and specific services primarily to educational institutions.

Medium-low risk and slightly overvalued.

Similar Companies

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$522.0% undervalued
63 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
MELI logo
John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

Fair Value:US$7.31k73.7% undervalued
115 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative
RC
PYPL logo
rcb9 on PayPal Holdings ·

Ten Percent More Volume, One Percent More Transaction Margin

Fair Value:US$70.8913.2% undervalued
18 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
HE
HedgeY
MU logo
HedgeY on Micron Technology ·

Micron - The Memory Bottleneck Behind the AI Supercycle

Fair Value:US$1.25k22.7% undervalued
48 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

RO
RockeTeller
SLVR logo
RockeTeller on Silver Tiger Metals ·

Silver Tiger Metals: Permitted Mine + $304M Underground PEA, Low AISC, First Pour 2027

Fair Value:CA$10.290.4% undervalued
14 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
1 users have liked this narrative
DA
BST logo
danmad on Boresight ·

A rapidly expanding sector with a lot of growth to come

Fair Value:AU$0.9864.3% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AL
BUSER logo
AlfredB on Bambuser ·

The Market is Asleep on Bambuser ...A Forensic Look at a Textbook SaaS Turnaround and AI Pivot

Fair Value:SEK 14684.7% undervalued
2 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28023.3% undervalued
345 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9115.1% overvalued
193 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0945.6% undervalued
221 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

HA
HarishPK
EVER logo
HarishPK on EverQuote ·

Feedback welcome!

3
|
0
MA
MRNA logo
Madave on Moderna ·

Aged like wine

2
|
0